Started By
Message

re: Leaked Pfizer study shows that vaccine particles are hugely sequestered into the ovaries

Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:28 am to
Posted by Pezzo
Member since Aug 2020
1974 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:28 am to
quote:

So S-protein distribution may well be less systemic in larger mammals/humans than in mice.


well, thats good. i guess we should just test humans and find out huh? there is millions of candidates who'd love a free donut or oooo some chicken tendies would be nice too.

Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68425 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:34 am to
quote:


so why spend all this time and money studying the effects on mice, if it holds no significance,
What is the significance?
quote:

to give blood from different parts of their body
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124183 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:35 am to
quote:

i guess we should just ...
Well, not everyone.
Some are more prone to side effects.

In your case, I'd be concerned about a postvaccination secondary injury due to the sky falling.
Posted by Pezzo
Member since Aug 2020
1974 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:48 am to
quote:

to give blood from different parts of their body



sorry excuse my ignorance...tissue samples.

its only a few staples to stitch it back up right?

cant wait to get some donuts with my coupons
Posted by Pezzo
Member since Aug 2020
1974 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:49 am to
quote:

injury due to the sky falling.


pfft everyone knows the sky cant fall. nice try though
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12974 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Gates wanted to win a peace prize, so he aligned with Epstein (well documented)

So Gates wanted a trophy.

quote:

Epstein wanted to build a eugenics utopia based off his own DNA

I can relate, especially after events over this past year.
quote:

Read between the lines
These folks are psychotic...

Those lines are far apart with an infinite amount of speculation in between. So why feign wisdom/insight over this?
Posted by DeepBlueSea
Member since Jan 2018
773 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:58 am to
quote:

"hugely sequestered into the ovaries"???
Really???


I mean, I don’t disagree at all. I would never choose that phrasing because I think it suggests that a relatively large percentage of the total injected dose ended up in the ovaries. I guess they went for the click-bait route and would defend it on the basis of total lipid concentration, though, which imo was an extremely poor choice in terms of establishing credibility.

Still, the findings themselves are interesting. The ovaries, adrenals, spleen, and liver do seem to be disproportionately affected, but in the case of the ovaries the causal mechanism seems as though it might be a bit more complex and/or tougher to unravel. Also of note, at least in my mind, was that the testes didn’t seem to experience a remotely similar level of uptake. Maybe the epididymal structure served as an efficient filter, or the testicular tissue didn’t have the same affinity for particulate concentration, or something else entirely. I’d be curious to know the possible mechanism, as well as if this is a commonly observed finding in these types of studies or if it’s unique to the C19 vaccine.

I wouldn’t even begin to make a medical decision for myself or my children based on this one study (or this one article, especially), but at the very least I think it calls for accessible followup research.
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25552 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 11:03 am to
Similar to the death rate. So is this a large number or not?
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18002 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 11:12 am to
quote:

People are full fricking retard about this vaccine.

Just go on and refuse it and quit trying to convince the rest of us you’re being rational.

Dude, your second sentence is as full f'n retarded as what you're (perhaps legitimately) calling others full f'n retarded about.

It is completely rational for people that perceive negligible to no risk from the virus to not bother taking a vaccine to appease others.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68425 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 11:25 am to
quote:


sorry excuse my ignorance...tissue samples.

its only a few staples to stitch it back up right?

cant wait to get some donuts with my coupons
Your ignorance on the matter impairs your ability to "think for yourself." You haven't the knowledge to come to any accurate conclusions. You don't even realize that.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124183 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I’d be curious to know the possible mechanism, as well as if this is a commonly observed finding in these types of studies or if it’s unique to the C19 vaccine.
It's liposome related, and dose related. The more vaccine sequestered intramuscularly, the less that reaches any organ. These mice received 500X the human dose, so there was exceedingly high intravascular and systemic spillover.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15050 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 11:48 am to
You DO know that this was first discovered in 1895 by a nab who won the Nobel prize in Chemistry research and is used in things like Tetanus shots, yes? Look on the side to see what is being tested - it's called ALC-0315 and ALC-0159. It's feature is low human and overall environmental toxicity.

LINK

And...

LINK

This post was edited on 5/31/21 at 11:52 am
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17904 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Gates has been known to sterilize people in Africa with his "vaccines". Are the elite at it again?



Related:

The Cover-Up Continues: Bill Gates, Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein

Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41714 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 11:58 am to
Thank God I don’t have ovaries.

Anymore.
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
18106 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:31 pm to
You couldn’t pay me to take the vaccines for covid.
Posted by tigafan4life
Member since Dec 2006
48940 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:39 pm to
I don’t remember where I saw the article but it was in so many words about young women who are now skipping periods or having serious cramps with periods after receiving the vaccine. My 18 year is scared that she will be forced to get it and not be able to bear children and I don’t blame her one bit.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:27 pm to
Since way more libs are getting it this wouldn’t be the worst thing to ever happen
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68917 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

JesusHChrist people!!!

"hugely sequestered into the ovaries"???
Really???

<0.1% for 8-48 hrs is "hugely sequestered"???


No, but let's look the other way.

Does that look like no risk involved? Truth is in the middle.


And again, I'd side with the anti people on this because they actually don't care if you get one. They just don't want to be forced to get it.

Big diff in how people view this and personal choices.
This post was edited on 5/31/21 at 2:02 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124183 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Does that look like no risk involved?
Yeah, if you take 500X the normal dose, which is literally what was measured, I'd suppose there could be risks involved. Wouldn't surprise me a bit.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11404 posts
Posted on 5/31/21 at 3:32 pm to
A good friend - completely healthy - died from a blood clot two days after the vaccine - no way in hell I would ever take a rushed vaccine that Permanently changes your immune system
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram