- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3009 |
| Registered on: | 8/19/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
0
re: Who are y’all using for home internet?
Posted by Pezzo on 5/20/26 at 3:10 pm to King of New Orleans
cox has my whole neighborhood by the balls
$110 a month for just 500 mbps internet
$110 a month for just 500 mbps internet
did his vaccine work?
i voted for him, will vote for him in the run off too
Lafayette parish finally shot down a tax hike too, I’m very surprised
this is already happening in America with the flock cameras. coming to every city near you within the next couple years
quote:
those vehicles will ultimately get new engines if they are in the build range exhibiting failures.
i have a friend who had one with a catastrophic MB failure, but his vin number didnt fall in the range of the recall so they didnt do the full engine replacement that the recall calls for. Toyota only replaced the short block. they wont replace the whole engine, they'll most likely replace only what part they deem is failing. which means you'll get an engine thats been in a million pieces and put back together.
quote:
Rumor is a newer design of the 3.5 is coming with the 2027 line.
for toyota's sake i hope thats true, but ultimately that makes the 2022-2026 model years completely worthless. i imagine every one who still owes on one will be under water the second they announce a redesign.
re: Second Toyota engine recall delayed because company doesn’t have a fix for problem
Posted by Pezzo on 5/11/26 at 8:23 pm to TheRealTigerHorn
My explanation is from an idiots point of view. I didn’t make the claim but only repeated what I’ve seen from these guys. And what you said lines up with what they said. And what they said is their “theory” as to what “should” remedy the issue. The point of my post is to call BS on the “machining debris” lie. Because that’s what it is. Toyota is trying to cover their asses. They claim the engines that were failing from “machine debris” were all coming from the same shop when that was a lie. It’s a design flaw. They also claim that the tolerances were too tight and that’s also a lie because the tolerances of the 5.7 V8 were much tighter than the 3.5, again im regurgitating what I’ve seen from truck guys who know more than me. And they showed the spec sheets with the tolerances of both engines.
For what it’s worth I have only driven Toyota in my lifetime and it’s extremely disappointing to me that they are still trying to pass the “machining debris” lie off.
For what it’s worth I have only driven Toyota in my lifetime and it’s extremely disappointing to me that they are still trying to pass the “machining debris” lie off.
re: Second Toyota engine recall delayed because company doesn’t have a fix for problem
Posted by Pezzo on 5/11/26 at 6:43 pm to weagle1999
quote:
The problem stems from a faulty production process that leaves machining debris inside the engine. This debris may prevent the vehicle’s crankshaft from rotating while running
From what I’ve read and saw on the internet, the gear heads are calling BS on this. It’s not machining debris, it’s a faulty design and use of the wrong oil. A thicker oil can remedy the problem.
wasnt this predicted a couple weeks ago by some twitter guy? he said they would do this and they would blame the US.
i'm sure the democrats/climate change believers will want to punish them for this...right?
i'm sure the democrats/climate change believers will want to punish them for this...right?
quote:
Good Lord.
what, you never had to dismember someone and then puree their insides in a blender afterwards in self dense before?
what stocks should i put my future havid-26 stimulus in?
can we start calling it havid-26 yet?
can we start calling it havid-26 yet?
How many votes does bill gates and Oprah get? Enough to cancel out normal citizens?
quote:
or get EC votes somewhere else.
does it make sense now why we see the democrats pushing the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact pacts in all their blue states to make it so the popular vote gets the EC? with sanctuary cities in major cities across America they can assure the popular vote always gets EC from these states. Voter ID will be the final nail in the democrat coffin in my opinion.
they saw the writing on the wall and are in panic mode. these are their last ditch efforts to undermine and subvert the electoral process.
re: New SCOTUS ruling shifts 12 house seats to Republicans across the South
Posted by Pezzo on 4/29/26 at 10:56 am to mwade91383
quote:
Expect all gerrymandering to keep getting worse before we get a real longterm fix.
explain your thought process on this. i dont see how it could get worse after this decision. this is one step to getting better long term. the long term fix isnt from fixing racial gerrymandering alone. its fixing the issue of allowing states like cali to draw districts with inflated populations that are counting non-citizens in their voting population. the long term fix is a voter ID and illegal immigration problem.
My hope is that this opens the door for discussion on these states that include non-citizens in the census and therefore including them in their population to draw districts. this whole mess needs to be cleaned up and i hope this was the first stepping stone to that cleaning.
quote:
The problem is that sticking with the "race = district" mindset leads us to Callias
It leads to far worse problems down the road....a slippery slope if you will. if it can be done for racial minorities then it can be done for any type of minority. where does the slippery slope stop?
re: SCOTUS rules on Callais
Posted by Pezzo on 4/29/26 at 9:22 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Depends on their reasoning. If they stated they were redistricting for race based reasons, yes.
that was the whole reason for the case. they gerrymandered the frick out of Louisiana to catch pockets of black communities and give them their own district because "voter rights act".
will this apply to the rest of the unconstitutional redistricting happening in cali and the rest of the shite states?
if you like that type of content then you may like Godlogic, who tries to go to their mosque to debate their leaders. he goes into their communities all around the US and exposes what its like.
this one is time stamped to show what it looks like in a muslim run city of america (dearborn michigan). very sobering. godlogic is the darker black dude in the middle of the thumbnail.
can only embed one per post it looks like so here are more links.
the rest of these link are just Godlogic
Youtube Link
Youtube Link
also more on the topic of proving islam wrong:
https://www.answering-islam.org/
this one is time stamped to show what it looks like in a muslim run city of america (dearborn michigan). very sobering. godlogic is the darker black dude in the middle of the thumbnail.
can only embed one per post it looks like so here are more links.
the rest of these link are just Godlogic
Youtube Link
Youtube Link
also more on the topic of proving islam wrong:
https://www.answering-islam.org/
Popular
45
