re: Kash responds to Candace Owens claims about Charlie Kirk

quote:

---

Would Charlie agree with Candace or his wife/tpusa?

---

Is this some type of trick question? His wife of course. Deeply held philosophical ideals face their limits when in conflict with the universal maxim “If momma ain’t happy, ain’t NOBODY happy!”

quote:

---

Also - Nick basically declared war on Tucker last night. The right continues to be divided. I have no idea who to side with right now as there's not enough info.

---

There's plenty of info available. It just depends on which camp it's coming from and which narrative you believe.

Want my honest advice? Be on your own side and leave the shite-flinging to the attention whores that are busy flinging shite right now. Decouple from any and all narratives. They're lying to you, and me, and all of us. And not a single goddamn one of them is on "your side".

Pull the plug, brother. They're never going to let the truth out without sowing doubt by discrediting it from 50 different angles. Don't expect any key players to be named in whatever redacted version we get of the Epstein files, either.

Yeah... she loved Charlie so much she wants to destroy everything connected to him. Lol she has warped the minds of quite a few people. They look at what she's doing and actually attribute it to loving Charlie.


It's clear to everyone with even half a brain that she's exploiting his death. She's desperately trying to David Hogg him.

quote:

---

Nick basically declared war on Tucker last night

---

Neither of these guys are on the right. They are grifters. Tucker may be CIA, Nick is almost certainly another Matt Drudge

quote:

---

Nick basically declared war on Tucker last night. I have no idea who to side with right now.
How about neither. They are both grifters, along with most of the other podcasters.

---

I definitely think Tucker is a grifter, but I've always thought fuentes was sincere in his views and not grifting.

However, Coleman Hughes just did an analysis of Fuentes juxtaposing his "streamer" personality with how he's represented himself on his recent podcast tour.

Fuentes comes off significantly different depending on the platform and it's crystal clear at least one of (if not both) his personas are an act.

So yeah, he is a grifter. Further, based on the views he espoused on Crowders show, he's also a leftist.

quote:

---

The trump plan is working nicely, fake everything when it’s against him or his cult. Hoax, witch-hunt, trust nobody because he’s always right about everything.

---

a thread about Owens and Kirk and this TDS infested moron has to bring up Trump. He is living rent free in your head. Enjoy your tax cut and your next 3 years.

quote:

---

And the "great friends" label was likely Kirk's way of maintaining public cordiality and loyalty to their shared conservative roots, even as their actual friendship had cooled into something more distant by that time. We have multiple post-death statements from TPUSA insiders noting that Kirk kept things cordial out of respect for their prior partnership but hadn't spoken to her in years.

---

I frankly dgaf about any of this drama. Never really followed/listened any of the people mentioned in this thread other than Tucker, and the occasional CK clips. Mainly glad Matt Walsh has kept his nose clean in all of this as I think he is solid, and Conservative men should give him more listens.

With that said, if CK and CO weren't close friends up to his death I don't understand why she would be in a text thread where he would throw out personal thoughts like where his relationship with Israel is going.

quote:

---

With that said, if CK and CO weren't close friends up to his death I don't understand why she would be in a text thread where he would throw out personal thoughts like where his relationship with Israel is going.

---

Well, for one, it wasn't a text thread. It was a WhatsApp group with dozens of TPUSA insiders, Jewish rabbis, and other allies who were trying to navigate the fallout of the loss of donor support in the wake of the war between Israel and Hamas. Candace Owens, as a former member of TPUSA, was looped in for strategic reasons. Kirk saw her as someone who could bridge the growing gap between TPUSA and the anti-interventionist wing of the MAGA movement.

Candace may be wrong about all of it but I’m surprised how many on this board just believe what the feds tell us happened. Tyler Robinson does not look like the guy they showed everyone prior to capture. The level of security for the event was a joke. That roof isn’t even above eye level where thousands of people were that day. The wound looks like an exit wound to many military people. That round of ammunition would have likely done more damage. The only video we’ve been provided in the year 2025 is grainy and almost worthless. He jumps off the roof with the rifle then decides to hide it in a place it could be easily found which is the most damning evidence. He then puts his actions in writing to his tranny boyfriend even though he doesn’t want to be caught.
Some of the people at TPUSA have clearly lied about Charlie Kirk’s beliefs toward Israel His wife is beyond strange and possibly the most fake person I’ve seen. Mikie McCoys actions that day were extremely suspicious to put it mildly. All of them have benefited more than anyone from Charlie’s death. There are also some strange things going on with their tax filing and financials. The event itself was scheduled very quickly in comparison to other events. It does es typically take more time to schedule something where thousands of people will be. One of the employees took the card from the camera. None of these things may have anything to do with his actual death but certainly raise suspicion.
Candace may be off her rocker but this blind following of the narrative we’ve been given is also insane