- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kash Patel counters Tucker Carlson - It's on!!
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:52 pm to dgnx6
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:52 pm to dgnx6
quote:
So if you believed Tucker then you believe the fbi since that’s where his info came from.
Not true for me at least. Not every single person in the FBI is on the same playing field, with the same biases or same knowledge. There will be good, honest whistleblowers and there will be the corrupted and compromised higher ups (not even saying Kash or Dan) with no moral compass and then everyone else in between those 2 groups.
0
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:53 pm to Timeoday
Why'd they shoot him then?
That dude could have been one of the elitist operators in the history of operators if channeled properly.
That dude could have been one of the elitist operators in the history of operators if channeled properly.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:55 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Kash Patel counters Tucker Carlson
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:56 pm to KTrain915
quote:
Am I crazy or does this not actually say anything? Giving stats about how many people worked on the case makes it even weirder that there seems to be a good bit of missing info.
What stands out to me is... out of 25 social media/forum accounts, 13 devices and 10 financial accounts... "Crooks had limited online and in person interactions".
Which is, in essence, EXACTLY what Tucker accuses the FBI of saying- I'm left wondering, where did Tucker Carlson lie?
You can split hairs on "no footprint" vs "limited interactions"... but the fact remains we learned more from 34min of a Tucker Carlson Presentation than we have in SIXTEEN MONTHS of FBI information releases.
If anything, Kash's pushback just frikkin proved it.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:01 pm to GeauxBurrow312
Stephen Miller is the top dog. The media will always spin and Massie is certainly doing his part to divide the GOP.
However, I am certainly happy the files will be released soon.
However, I am certainly happy the files will be released soon.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:03 pm to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
Yes. That does not mean every “conservative” (they are grifters) should spend what is going on half a year derailing everything that actually impacts our daily life - illegals, trade, investment, social policy
Totally agree with this.
I don’t care either way about the files but let’s not act like the ppl that were passionate about this shouldn’t be upset.
It’s insulting for the admin to now tell everyone to forget about it and move on. They’d probably fair better by not mentioning it anymore
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:15 pm to dgnx6
quote:
if you believed Tucker then you believe the fbi since that’s where his info came from
I don’t believe that’s true. The fbi scrubbed crooks online presence. What they did not scrub was replies to crooks and instances of where he was quoted. These are the basis of a lot of what Tucker says.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:21 pm to The_Duke
Agree other than on how to handle it
How can you not mention it when every social media grifter and a handful of loser congressmen bring it up daily? Trump wants to move on, there is a segment who refuse to do so
It is disappointing they hyped up the Epstein files for years only to face plant like they did. That is not a valid reason to concede 4 years of government control and not get anything else done
quote:
They’d probably fair better by not mentioning it anymore
How can you not mention it when every social media grifter and a handful of loser congressmen bring it up daily? Trump wants to move on, there is a segment who refuse to do so
It is disappointing they hyped up the Epstein files for years only to face plant like they did. That is not a valid reason to concede 4 years of government control and not get anything else done
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:22 pm to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
It’s not infighting when it’s one side acting like children. The libertardian wing. They will derail the whole administration, and the same people will then blame the GOP for not removing more illegals, not getting more fair trade, didn’t cut enough foreign aid, didn’t do enough on DEI, ANTIFA and so on. All because they cared so much about Epstein.
Well past time to move the frick on.
There is very little in this version of the administration worth fighting for.
The current GOP is still riddled with a terminal cancer of Deep State and Neoconservatism. Trump loves Lindsey Graham, is bending over backwards to please his donors and Bibi, and he is selling us out on H1B's and Chinese students.
The "Woke Right" / Zoomer conservatives make no distinction between the radical left and this remaining husk of the GOPe (Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, EyePatch McCain, Kinzinger, etc), nor should they.
As an honourary member of the Zoomer conservative angry white male movement, I am telling you that I have zero preference between a Gavin Newsom / AOC ticket and a JD Vance / Marco Rubio ticket. I will no longer blindly pull the lever for JDV/Marco. There are millions like me.
If JD Vance continues to be red pilled and chooses someone like Thomas Massie or Tucker Carlson as his running mate, I will go all in to support them.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:24 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I am telling you that I have zero preference between a Gavin Newsom / AOC ticket and a JD Vance / Marco Rubio ticket
The single most retarded thing I have ever read
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:25 pm to Timeoday
And no one believes that. He just kept to himself and tried to kill Trump. Yea ok.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:25 pm to GeauxBurrow312
Read the next line.
JD Vance is malleable. I'm not rejecting him. I'm rejecting neoconservatism. I only reject him if he picks Marco Rubio or Glen Younkin. I will not reject him if he picks a true noninterventionist / populist.
For what it's worth, I actually very much like the way that JD Vance has been trending this past 18 months and especially the last 3 weeks.
quote:
If JD Vance continues to be red pilled and chooses someone like Thomas Massie or Tucker Carlson as his running mate, I will go all in to support them.
JD Vance is malleable. I'm not rejecting him. I'm rejecting neoconservatism. I only reject him if he picks Marco Rubio or Glen Younkin. I will not reject him if he picks a true noninterventionist / populist.
For what it's worth, I actually very much like the way that JD Vance has been trending this past 18 months and especially the last 3 weeks.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Except Kash is specifically saying here that it's a closed case.
And he’s said if more information comes out it can be opened back up. I don’t think the information y’all want to be there is actually there
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:29 pm to Timeoday
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:30 pm to SirWinston
I think that’s generally fair, but a little generous to Vance and a little too harsh on Rubio. Rubio has been most improved. While Vance has shown he is unwilling to ditch his silicon bros, his H1B stance is terrible
I would rather have gridlock and at least try to fix a problem at a time than say frick it and give it to the godless socialists though. We won’t have a country left to fix if AOC or her ilk make higher office.
People don’t seem to realize how many tens of millions the democrats plan on naturalizing and bringing to this country.
I would rather have gridlock and at least try to fix a problem at a time than say frick it and give it to the godless socialists though. We won’t have a country left to fix if AOC or her ilk make higher office.
People don’t seem to realize how many tens of millions the democrats plan on naturalizing and bringing to this country.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:34 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Exactly, glad that barking dog behind the fence, Kash, explained how much info they have. How about 1.5 years after the incident you let the public know what the frick was going on.
They talk about transparency but they hide shite and spin shite all day.
They talk about transparency but they hide shite and spin shite all day.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:34 pm to Timeoday
Let me gets this straight:
Tucker releases never before seen video of Crooks holding a gun and pretending to shoot, making various death threats to multiple politicians on YouTube comments, and being in contact with a third party.
And Kash’s response is “we did over 1,000 interviews!”………..
…….
…….. AND??!?!?!?
Tucker releases never before seen video of Crooks holding a gun and pretending to shoot, making various death threats to multiple politicians on YouTube comments, and being in contact with a third party.
And Kash’s response is “we did over 1,000 interviews!”………..
…….
…….. AND??!?!?!?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:37 pm to Timeoday
The FBI is a domestic spying and political enforcement unit. The NSA/CIA is the foreign equivalent. All should be terminated.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:38 pm to BugAC
quote:
He's said some very bizarre and off the wall stuff lately.
The clicks must flow.
Someone asked if folks trust the FBI...me...not fully.
Should I also trust someone who makes his money by getting people to his site/page/podcast/tv show?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:49 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
I don’t think the information y’all want to be there is actually there
Come again?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News