re: Judicial Jurisprudence killing Trump EO’s.

quote:

---

I used the AEA as an example. He simply did not use the correct wording.

---

What a stupid way to run a country. "You can't do what the people elected you to do unless you use the magic words!"

quote:

---

but the method and use of words is very important

---

And here's the problem. You care more about the process than the results. You'll never save your country like that. The democrats broke every rule to bring in 20 million leeches, gangbangers, rapists, and murderers but you demand the Republicans not only follow every single minute law, rule, or norm, but also, now, they must say the exact right words while doing so.

It's insanity. You might as well just break out the lube for the democrats, because getting fricked is the only thing that will happen with the way you want things done. Losing your country because you demand your side adhere to rules to overturn the evil perpetrated against us by those who flagrantly violate the law is simply retarded.

Common sense is struggling to survive on the right.

quote:

---

Or dissolve SCOTUS as Jesse Kelly explains here:

---

Some people have lost their damn minds.

That’s not a Patek…

quote:

---

What are the rest of us supposed to think when you say shite like this?

---

Is there a limit on what SCOTUS could declare in your eyes and maintain legitimacy? You would just accept any opinion they ever issued as something that must be respected and adhered to regardless of the facts?

quote:

---

You care more about the process than the results.

---

Lets put it another way. Are you ok with the next democrat president having the same power that Trump is using now. Being able to decide on spending through EO without having to go through congress?

The Biden crew ran wild refusing to enforce laws, indeed aiding and abetting the act of breaking probably every immigration law on the books in plain sight for everyone to see. WHERE was the judiciary then? Cheering them on.

Now that Trump actually tries to enforce the law, which is...duh..HIS JOB...oh no we can't have that because it impedes the Left's agenda.

Most of what he is doing is either undoing an action an earlier President took. or exercising his Article 2 powers. The Judiciary has no jurisdiction .

quote:

---

Whoever is advising the President on legal matters.

---

So when the president, as Commander in Chief, directs a policy that says "no more trannies in the military", is the person advising him in the wrong? A judge slapped an injunction on it, so they must be wrong if the metric is "a judge disagreed with it."

quote:

---

I don't have any inside information

---

Nor do I, nor do I have a law degree. But when I see a judge issue an injunction about military personnel decisions it doesn't do much for the judges who may be issuing legally correct (to the extent such things exist) opinions.

quote:

---

What a stupid way to run a country.

---

TenWheels, you make some good points, but laws ARE made up of words. On what basis do you suggest we run the country?

As for deportation, laws aren't the problem. Resources are. I think there are less than 700 immigration judges. THAT is a national crisis, because it's that bottleneck that leads to illegal aliens being in the country FOR YEARS until their cases are resolved.

Hire 7,000 immigration judges for three years. THAT would go a long way toward solving the problem.

quote:

---

I used the AEA as an example. He simply did not use the correct wording.

---

Lengthy thread from Prof. Margot Cleveland explaining why the judge in the AEA syntax case did Trump a favor:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.