- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge rules school district must return books with graphic sex themes to school libraries
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:36 am to Night Vision
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:36 am to Night Vision
Yeah Trump is totally creating the constitutional crisis not the judges who have become dictators overnight
0
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:37 am to John Barron
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:37 am to Night Vision
At this point, I guess the best thing to do would be to just dismantle all other layers of government and bureaucratic framework and run everything via judicial edict. If nothing else, it would cut out the need for a lot of unnecessary bloat.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:37 am to Night Vision
What constitutional right do minors have to pornographic material in an education setting? I’ll hang up and listen.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:38 am to Night Vision
Who died and made her God? The buck stops with us. Can these judges be sued? It is high time to make them pay. If they lose their case they should be required to pay court costs and the total sum of the suite.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 11:40 am
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:40 am to Night Vision
You pretty much know which threads SFP won't go in.
This will be one of them.
Just like with covid. He was all up in the ones arguing about the vaccine effectiveness but completely absent for the mandate threads.
This will be one of them.
Just like with covid. He was all up in the ones arguing about the vaccine effectiveness but completely absent for the mandate threads.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:46 am to Night Vision
Interesting case. Understanding the procedural status may be important.
This is NOT an ex parte TRO ruling, to be in place only a week or so until a hearing on a preliminary injunction. This is a preliminary injunction ruling, which will be in place until full litigation of the case in a year or so.
Apparently, the ACLU skipped requesting a TRO, probably because they knew they would lose on a TRO ... no permanent and irreparable injury, if the books get stuck in a closet for a week.
On one hand, there is the traditional deference given to local school districts on matter of education. On the other hand, the school board is clearly abridging speech. This sort of case involves a balancing of those two, competing interests.
I haven't read the briefing, but my initial inclination is that the Judge got the balancing wrong on this one and that she should not have issued the injunction.
This is NOT an ex parte TRO ruling, to be in place only a week or so until a hearing on a preliminary injunction. This is a preliminary injunction ruling, which will be in place until full litigation of the case in a year or so.
Apparently, the ACLU skipped requesting a TRO, probably because they knew they would lose on a TRO ... no permanent and irreparable injury, if the books get stuck in a closet for a week.
On one hand, there is the traditional deference given to local school districts on matter of education. On the other hand, the school board is clearly abridging speech. This sort of case involves a balancing of those two, competing interests.
I haven't read the briefing, but my initial inclination is that the Judge got the balancing wrong on this one and that she should not have issued the injunction.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:48 am to Jbird
quote:The thread is barely 30 minutes old, my friend.
So selective in which legal thread they jump into.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:48 am to Night Vision
I didn't see the judges ruling or her comments.
I'd like to know how she rationalizes this horrible decision. Surely faggiehank could shed some light, this is his kinda thing.
I'd like to know how she rationalizes this horrible decision. Surely faggiehank could shed some light, this is his kinda thing.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:49 am to Night Vision
this is precisely the time that you provoke them to go further
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:51 am to jamiegla1
quote:
this is precisely the time that you provoke them to go further
I think Miller is doing just that. Trump's team had to know what these judges were going to do.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:52 am to Night Vision
We have federal laws about obscene material in the presence of minors. Could not be a clearer case to go arrest the judge. If Bondi doesn't produce an arrest in 24hrs here, she should be fired. Same with Kash.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:52 am to rickyh
quote:If the litigant (here the ACLU) is found to have filed a frivolous lawsuit, they can certainly be hit with various sanctions.
Can these judges be sued? It is high time to make them pay. If they lose their case they should be required to pay court costs and the total sum of the suite (sic, suit?).
OTOH, the judge does not have much discretion as to which cases get filed in (or assigned to) her court. It isn't "her case."
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:54 am to Night Vision
glue the pages together and put them back
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:54 am to lake chuck fan
quote:I suspect that she prioritized the obvious First Amendment concerns over the traditional deference to local decisions on matters of education.
I'd like to know how she rationalizes this horrible decision. Surely ... hank could shed some light ....
Again, I disagree with her balancing based upon what little of the detail we have seen to date.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 11:55 am
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:54 am to AggieHank86
quote:
the school board is clearly abridging speech.
No school board provides copies of every book in print, so I guess they're all "abridging speech."
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:55 am to AggieHank86
quote:
OTOH, the judge does not have much discretion as to which cases get filed in (or assigned to) her court. It isn't "her case."
Well, it sure wasn't going to be given to a judge like Chamberlain Haller.
I'm pretty sure she was picked for this particular case. Don't know how but it does happen.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:58 am to Flats
quote:To some extent that is true in a layman's sense, but the First Amendment addresses "abridgement" based upon political/ideological views.quote:No school board provides copies of every book in print, so I guess they're all "abridging speech."
the school board is clearly abridging speech.
When a given book is rejected purely based upon a political view concerning its content (as is admitted here), you have a different kettle of fishies.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:00 pm to Night Vision
The US Judicial Branch was the very first Branch of the Federal Govt to be completely conquered by the Radical American Left.
This is an all-out effort to stop all American resistance to the Globo Homo Queer Planet agenda destiny that the Left have intended for the USA.
The plan is to make the USA the world power that spreads Globo Homo world wide in order to make a Queer Planet.
We're seen a lot of resistance from the Judiciary, because they have been Leftist the longest.
This is an all-out effort to stop all American resistance to the Globo Homo Queer Planet agenda destiny that the Left have intended for the USA.
The plan is to make the USA the world power that spreads Globo Homo world wide in order to make a Queer Planet.
We're seen a lot of resistance from the Judiciary, because they have been Leftist the longest.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:01 pm to Night Vision
Was going to state 'The Bee' is on a role with these judicial parodies....
Ooopsie.
It's like these absurd leftists read the Bee for inspiration in their work.
Ooopsie.
It's like these absurd leftists read the Bee for inspiration in their work.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News