- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:04 am to loogaroo
quote:
The suit was brought on behalf of a pregnant immigrant,
Illegal immigrant?
quote:
A federal judge in New Hampshire granted class-action status
Granting class action status is the loophole.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:06 am to loogaroo
quote:
The suit was brought on behalf of a pregnant immigrant,
Thousand of voters harmed by election fraud, no standing!
One illegal files suit, yes, they have standing!
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 11:07 am
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:10 am to back9Tiger
quote:
I thought the USSC sorted this shite out.
They did. Liberal activists judges just don't care, so they ignore the ruling.
The answer is to reciprocate the dismissal. Action = equal + opposite reaction and such. Ignore the block, carry on with business as usual.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:16 am to Harry Boutte
We don’t need to change the law yet, we need scotus to interpret the existing law. Most people don’t think the existing law grants birth right citizenship as it is being applied today because the law was intended to address freed slaves after the civil war, not mass illegal migration from other countries.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:18 am to loogaroo
Good. Now the USSC can make a ruling on birthright citizenship.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:21 am to loogaroo
I think what has really shook me to my bones over the past 10 years is how many people in the government, big business, the judiciary, legacy media and academia are partnering to destroy the US from within....truly they are the enemies from within.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:33 am to ifyoubuildit
quote:
we need scotus to interpret the existing law.
It's my impression that they already have some time ago. Why not just make the law more clear?
ETA:
quote:
not mass illegal migration from other countries.
There was no such thing as illegal migration when the 14th Amendment was passed. We had open borders for the first hundred years of our history, and only started restricting immigration when we wanted to exclude a bunch of Chinese from moving over here.
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 11:36 am
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:38 am to Harry Boutte
quote:
The solution is a constitutional amendment to change the law,
The constitution doesn't need to be amended. Retarded jurisprudence needs to be undone.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:02 pm to ifyoubuildit
they did that like way back in 1898. But our current sitting president decided to say nuh uh and issue an executive order because he doesn't agree with it.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:04 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Hognutz
SCOTUS must of known they left the door open so now what?
SC basically said bring it back to us when you have standing/class of people
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:12 pm to loogaroo
Imagine a Mexican going to Japan to have a kid and telling everyone their kid is Japanese.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:15 pm to HailToTheChiz
Why can’t a group of Americans file a class action suit against the government for the immediate harm that each anchor baby will cause the tax payer.
Every tax dollar spent on an illegal is a dollar not spent on an American in need. Every anchor baby is a direct harm to every working and middle class American as well as legal immigrants.
No other developed nation grants birthright citizenship
Every tax dollar spent on an illegal is a dollar not spent on an American in need. Every anchor baby is a direct harm to every working and middle class American as well as legal immigrants.
No other developed nation grants birthright citizenship
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:19 pm to loogaroo
quote:
The suit was brought on behalf of a pregnant immigrant,
Woah woah woah woah woah woah…. How does this individual have standing??
That isn’t a person according to the left. This person needs booted from the class action suit immediately and there should be absolutely zero argument against it.
Right libs??
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:20 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
so they ignore the ruling.
The ruling isn't being ignored
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:21 pm to SlayTime
If you reverse it, it would be accurate. You act like we are the only country in the world with citizenship by birth. Its actually the most common form of granting citizenship in the west.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:22 pm to Revelator
quote:
Thousand of voters harmed by election fraud
Link?
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:25 pm to Arkaea79
quote:
It's clearly an illegal immigrant ready to pop a baby out on US soil.
The Executive Order applies to a person born in the United States to a mother who was here legally but temporarily - basically anyone here on a visa.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:26 pm to BuzzdLightBeer
quote:
Every tax dollar spent on an illegal is a dollar not spent on an American in need
According to the current law they aren't illegals they are US citizens. I'm not a lawyer but how do you file a class action lawsuit saying money spent on born US citizens is harming other US citizens. You, me, whomever can not like it all we want. We have a process in place to change it. Trying to find a loophole to change it outside of our constitutional process is a hard line for me no matter who won the vote.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:28 pm to Harry Boutte
A constitutional amendment is one way to solve the problem, however simply legislatively defining the rules for birthright citizenship would be a big help.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News