re: Judge Beryl Howell goes all in blocks another Trump EO - Perkins Coie

quote:

---

As I said earlier in this thread, "Common sense" is " the crutch of dumb people and people who are losing arguments." When people can't rely on the facts, evidence, logic, etc., they devolve to hiding behind "common sense".

---

And that is why you cannot be taken seriously. Sometimes facts are provided by common sense. It is a trait that trumps legalities. When facts are scarce you must use common sense to find the facts. You, as a lawyer, use “well, where are the finger prints”. We say look at the item they touched.

quote:

---

So we're just making shite up, at that point. I think this proves my point above.

---

Not making up shite up at all. You are arguing a point and I am arguing a point. A judge ruled the way she did and you are backing her. I am arguing the opposite and will be ruled by another judge and probably end up in the scotus. Common sense will be applied to constitutional law. I know now that common sense is ignorance of the law as you just posted. We will see if common sense interpretations of the law fits with scotus. For you to use common sense as an interpretation or example of ignorance is typical. You sir, are a joke.

Nothing better than the process of a pretender coming out of the closet for all to see.

quote:

---

You seem confused.

---

You are a bot.

quote:

---

Nothing better than the process of a pretender coming out of the closet f

---

A pretender? What was I pretending?

quote:

---

They paid for the dossier it was billed to the campaign as legal advice

---

They facilitated the money transfer. And their role ended there, correct.

Don’t be retarded? Seems that you do this on a regular basis on here. Are you on the Soros payroll? Because you are 100 percent of the time on the opposing team.

I read this entire thread and it made me laugh. Several of the usual suspects have hijacked this thread based on their same old tired BS.

To simplify the subject, what is a security clearance?

quote:

---

A security clearance is a determination that an individual is deemed trustworthy enough to be granted access to classified information. This process involves a background investigation to assess an individual's character, loyalty, and trustworthiness, ensuring they can be trusted to handle sensitive national security information.

Here's a more detailed explanation: Purpose: To authorize individuals to access classified information based on their need-to-know and the level of security clearance they hold.

To protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure, which could potentially harm national security.

Process: 1. Application: . Individuals apply for a security clearance when they are offered a position requiring access to classified information.

2. Background Investigation: . The government conducts a thorough background investigation to assess the applicant's suitability.

3. Adjudication: . A security clearance is granted or denied based on the findings of the background investigation and adherence to specific adjudicative guidelines, says the American Public University.

4. Interim Clearance: . In some cases, an interim clearance may be granted to allow an individual to begin working in a position while the full background investigation is pending, says Go Government.

Levels of Security Clearances (US Government): Confidential: . Access to information that could cause damage to national security if disclosed.

Secret: . Access to information that could cause serious damage to national security if disclosed.

Top Secret: . Access to information that could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security if disclosed.

Factors Considered During the Security Clearance Process:
Loyalty to the United States.
Character and trustworthiness.
Honesty, reliability, and discretion.

Any potential security risks, such as criminal history or financial instability. In essence, a security clearance is a crucial step in ensuring the protection of national security information and is a prerequisite for many government and contractor positions involving sensitive information.

---

who grants security clearances? the Executive Branch.

so this status is vetted and approved solely by the Executive Branch. If the Executive branch says no, then no security clearance. No one has a right to a clearance, it is a courtesy. One that can be be denied or revoked for whatever reason the Executive Branch wants. Who decides if a person or an entity is trustworthy of classified info? The keepers of the info, which is the Executive Branch.

this case is another grand standing loser, beryl howell knows this. This is just another version of Lawfare meant to bog down the Trump Admin.

So the Trump Admin says the FedGov will no longer do business with PC. Therefore PC does not need or deserve a security clearance.That is the Constitutional granted power given to the Executive branch.

The End.

the irony is, when this goes forward we could learn in discovery in clear detail why the Trump Admin revoked the security clearance. That probably wont look very good for PC. The timing of this action in the wake of The Pentagon leaking like a sieve is probably not a coincidence.

Is that you, Sweeney?

Do you even ABA Formal Opinion 491 bro?