re: JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER: "...there is No Climate Emergency"

Obviously, he’s a cis gendered, angry, old, white, male, who’s a woman and colored people hating Nazi!

And his views must be suppressed up to death for the sake of democracy!

quote:

---

It is cute you thinks this means anything in this day and time...

---

Looks like we found the idiot who doesn't know what peer reviewed means

Hint - it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.

Seems he needs to stick to quantum entanglement

LINK

quote:

---

Before we get into the details of what is going here, let’s look at some of the stranger claims about climate science he has made:

The “IPCC and others” use a “cloud-free” Earth. [Odd claim, but simply not true].
“fluctuation[s] in the cloud cover of the earth that causes a sunlight reflectivity thermostat that controls the climate, control the temperature of the earth, and stabilize it very powerfully and very dramatically, a mechanism heretofore totally unnoticed.” [Clouds as a damping mechanism on climate change have been discussed in detail since the 1960s at least].
“The power in this thermostat in terms of what you can refer to as radiative forcing, this is how many watts per square meter of surface area are involved, and it is 200 times more powerful than the effect of CO2, and methane.” [This is at least a quantitative claim, see below for it’s lack of veracity].
“Interviewer: Are you suggesting that in none of these models the cloud cover is actually included? Dr. Clauser: Indeed” [Again, just not true].
“They really didn’t mention anything like this in the early IPCC reports.” [Simply false e.g. IPCC First Assessment Report (Chapter 3) from 1990].
“The two most recent IPCC reports did not discuss clouds” [Totally untrue].
“It’s [the albedo is] kept the same” [False – for instance here is a paper (Loeb et al, 2020) comparing the changes in albedo in models to the CERES observations].
“I haven’t talked to any of the modelers” [This is obvious!]
“The 40 models of the IPCC – most of which came from the Goddard Institute of Space Studies” [Where does this come from?]

..
So where does this leave us? Effectively, we have an overconfident Nobel Prize winner, who hasn’t done their homework in an area outside their field, who makes very obvious errors, and whose fame is being capitalized on by the forces of denial.

---

It's not cute, it's scary you will believe anything on the internet. Zero proof is what Maggots need to believe the twitter feed.

quote:

---

One of the stories that’s not being told by MSM is how close America is to a national emergency on the electric power grid because of the forced shut downs of reliable power that has been mandated because of these bogus climate emergencies.

---

US dependable base load power capacity is calculated primarily on sources with on demand capability such as coal/oil/natural gas fired plants, hydropower/dams and nuclear plants, the power production from these sources are not affected by weather conditions.

Over the past 20 years many of these base load plants have been reduced and replaced with windmills and solar farms, both of these green/renewable sources are incapable of meeting variable base load power generation requirements in severe weather condition such as extreme cold and heat.

quote:

---

Muh 99% of scientists!

---

What's hilarious is that the whole "consensus of Scientists " that was being pushed was such a horse shite lie.

Many of those "$cientists were Veterinarians, Gynecologists, so and and so forth......

quote:

---

dp

---

Thanks. Gives us 2 chances to dv you.

quote:

---

If the dims are pushing it, I already knew it was fake.

---

100% here. If the MSM and dims are pushing something, you can accurately assume the opposite is true!

quote:

---

But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.

---

The field was created for the scam and filled with only cult followers of the scam.