- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:12 pm to SaintTiger1
quote:
But of course y'all would believe the one quack
A 2022 Physics Nobel Prize Winner is a "quack" because he disagrees with your man-made global warming cult.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:21 pm to DavidTheGnome
So debunk his claims, rather than just generally criticizing him because you don't like his conclusions. I'm not saying he's correct but to act as if there is no overlap among different areas of science and that he would have no knowledge of light/heat refraction and retention etc. is funny. Maybe when all the climatologists are being funded to come up with one conclusion, it might take someone outside of that realm to get to the truth.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:21 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
If the dims, mainstream media, Bill Gates and the UN are pushing it, I already knew it was fake.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:32 pm to rnojoman
quote:
There is an overwhelming scientific consensus, maybe you should do some research?
There is not!
quote:
One cranky boomer scientist
One? What about Jennifer Marohasy? And Patrick Michaels? There are hundreds of skeptics. The reason there are not more is that the government holds the whip hand in the form of the grants that sustain those disciplines.
We saw this play out when hundreds of experts swore that a lab leak was virtually impossible. It was zoonotic, dammit! And then dozens of security experts swore that the Hunter laptop was a fake.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:46 pm to rnojoman
quote:
Looks like we found the idiot who doesn't know what peer reviewed means
Hint - it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.
Fauci's pets did a peer reviewed paper, at his request, to show that the virus was a zoonotic escape.
quote:
House Republicans convened a hearing last week on the conference call and the resulting paper, and one of the major sources of contention was the extent to which Fauci and Collins held financial sway over the scientists, who also had a grant application pending before the NIH. Democrats repeatedly characterized the argument in terms of a “bribe” being paid in exchange for a paper that exonerated a lab in Wuhan, China, that the NIH had been funding to do the kind of risky research that could spark a pandemic. Rather than a bribe, though, the question is one of leverage.
Peer Review is tantamount to politically influenced when government wields millions of dollars in grants.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:52 pm to rnojoman
quote:Instead of clucking and flying away, you should stick around and share your science with us.
so ignorant of science
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:04 pm to Penrod
quote:The bat soup thesis overtaking lab CV19 origin is a real time example. It took Fauci and a moneyspread about two weeks to turn fact into fiction and vice versa.
Peer Review is tantamount to politically influenced when government wields millions of dollars in grants
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:27 pm to Penrod
You are right but unfortunately many people including some on this board can’t focus for anything longer than 15 seconds. Read? Hell no. That’s too hard.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:06 pm to SaintTiger1
It’s long been my understanding the Earth’s climate has always changed over the eons. Hence, periods of extreme warmth, Ice Ages, severe drought, you name it.
So when was Earth’s climate supposed to become perpetually stable and no longer subject to such changes?
And what is Earth’s climate “supposed to be”?
So when was Earth’s climate supposed to become perpetually stable and no longer subject to such changes?
And what is Earth’s climate “supposed to be”?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:28 pm to GumboPot
May he RIP
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:39 pm to Kjnstkmn
No, 3rd biggest Scam after Covid (1) and the Ukraine (2) money laundering Scam.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:45 pm to GumboPot
I dont pretend like i know anything, but they scared us with the ice age, then acid rain, then the ozone, then global warming, now climate change because they have no idea what the frick they are talking about and just need more taxpayer money.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:49 pm to SaintTiger1
quote:
They also might need to write a paper about it and have it peer reviewed.
But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.
LINK /
125 Nobel laureates LINK
101 Nobel laureates LINK
76 Nobel laureates LINK
I guess all it would take is 1 climate scientist to tell you how eating horse deworming cream for Covid is stupid and you would finally believe them.
Lol, peer-reviewed.
Im going to get a big grant from the government, you are too. Why would we not say the shite we each are saying is right and not bogus? We need never ending funding.
Its our career.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:51 pm to rnojoman
quote:
Looks like we found the idiot who doesn't know what peer reviewed means
Hint - it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.
What is the end game for some of you who just blindly follow anything?
What do you get out of it? Do you feel safe?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:53 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Im going to get a big grant from the government, you are too. Why would we not say the shite we each are saying is right and not bogus? We need never ending funding.
This is a good point. Are we aware of any examples of any climate scientist(s) who spoke out against the “consensus” and continued to be well funded regardless for their continued research?
It would be interesting to know.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:54 pm to SaintTiger1
quote:
It's not cute, it's scary you will believe anything on the internet. Zero proof is what Maggots need to believe the twitter feed.
quote:
“We can kind of almost see the end,” Walensky told Maddow. “We’re vaccinating so very fast, our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don’t get sick, and that it’s not just in the clinical trials but it’s also in real world data.”
But they wouldnt lie, especially with billions of $ up for grabs.
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:56 pm to GumboPot
What about the 180 countries that agreed industrialized countries pay climate reparations to all the third world shitholes? 
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:57 pm to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
It’s long been my understanding the Earth’s climate has always changed over the eons. Hence, periods of extreme warmth, Ice Ages, severe drought, you name it.
So when was Earth’s climate supposed to become perpetually stable and no longer subject to such changes?
And what is Earth’s climate “supposed to be
Literally no one says it doesn't. The timeframes involved are the issue
Posted on 3/4/24 at 5:00 pm to Penrod
quote:
There is not!
There is though. Read the link I posted earlier. 97% of climatologist say that man-made climate change is a thing. 97% is pretty overwhelming.
And yes I'll take the word of people that study the climate over bubba the truck driver anytime
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News