re: JFK Zapruder Film Analysis (2 shots only)

At this point who cares? It doesn’t change the fact that JFK was assassinated. Everyone who could possibly be connected is dead. It’s just like proving FDR allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor to get the USA in WWII.

quote:

---

The women's testimony was repressed by the Commission and they were both threatened.

---

Because it was made up in advance that the Commission would use the deductive approach for the investigation.

They started with the premise that Oswald was the lone shooter and participant and only considered the particulars that supported it. (A priori)

Instead of looking at all of the particulars and arriving at a conclusion. (a posteriori)

The former approach makes the investigation of shorter duration and wraps everything up so neatly to become the official narrative. While daring anyone to disprove it.

Which means that the Commission dealt very little with Oswald's curious associations.

From his membership in the Civil Air Patrol with David Ferry at our own Shushan Airport here (Lakefront airport), to having fallen into a nest of guys who like guys led by Clay Shaw that our own Perry Russo happened to be at a party with and saw them all together, to the connection with Jack Ruby and so many others.

But would prefer to once more address the alleged murder weapon.

Personally have the "improved" version of the Italian Carcano 7.35mm compared to Oswald's 6.5mm.

The weapon Oswald purchased by mail-order.

A weapon that was notorious for blowing up in the shooter's face occasionally.

The bolt action is not exactly a smooth "mauser" action.

It's hard and somewhat difficult to bolt in rapid succession; so the number of seconds between 2 or 3 shots to be quibbled over makes for another of the official narrative's weak arguments.

Will admit that the bullet is particularly lethal. It's longer than those of most other field pieces of the day.

And was one of the early ones that would "flip" as do the bullets for the later M-16s and ARs.

All of which could be the reason for it blowing up on the shooter - from flipping before leaving the barrel because the charge from the cartridge wasn't strong enough to propel it fast enough.

Overall, it's a wretch of a weapon.

Which begs the question why such an unreliable weapon would've been used for the crime of the century.

For the other question about who did Oswald target prior to the assassination, it was General Edwin Walker who was contemplating running for President.

But Walker was stationary sitting in his own home for that attempt and Oswald couldn't hit him.

Yet he later was able to make those shots with that ridiculous weapon on a moving target.

Have not ever, and will not ever buy it.

Everybody should watch "the men who killed Kennedy". As Ron Paul said a few weeks ago it was coup de tat orchestrated by the CIA. The country has been down hill ever since.

quote:

---

Bullets spin, hence the spiral rifling in the barrels.

---

When they hit, they "keyhole," that's what is meant by it.

Which was verified by a school associate who saw action in the Dominican Republic using the M-16.

Take it up with him or others who have actually used them and seen the damage they do.

quote:

---

That would mean the first shot caused the James Tague wound?

---

according to this OP, yeah

so Marine marksman LHO shot down the street on his first shot

unless you believe his first shot hit the traffic light arm and went down the street to hit Tague and the curb. which is even more unbelievable to me

Was this the same bullet they found laying next to Connolly on his stretcher?

Back and to the left, brain matter exits rear left out to the far rear of the vehicle, reports of gunfire coming from that particular line of fire from grassy knoll…..quite straightforward it seems.

The thing that I’ve always found weird is that the shots supposedly came from the back. I wasn’t born when Kennedy was assassinated and never really thought much about it until the last few years.

I’ve never understood how the poor man’s brains blew out of the back of his head if he was shot from the back. It seems like he would have been pushed forward. Back and to the left. . . Back and to the left.

Oswald was involved. But there’s no way he acted alone. Why else would a mobster shoot him?

quote:

---

Was this the same bullet they found laying next to Connolly on his stretcher?

---

Yeah, the bullet that was shot into a vat of water then placed on the gurney.

quote:

---

Two female employees working in the Texas School Book Depository told investigators that Oswald was in the stairwell and break room during the shooting. The three were getting something to eat.

The women's testimony was repressed by the Commission and they were both threatened.

---

this. absolutely true.

there were many people who testified that Oswald was never on the six floor.

many people were threatened and silenced by the FBI and CIA.

our Federal Government has been corrupt for over 70 years.
the swamp is much deeper than we think.