Started By
Message

James webb tele proving big bang theory probably is inaccurate

Posted on 9/8/22 at 6:49 pm
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24597 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 6:49 pm
LINK

You tube link, 12 min watch funny the telescope they built to prove it is actually refuting it with it's discoveries.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22772 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:06 pm to
Wrong. The jest has not proven or even suggested the Big Bang theory is wrong. What it did do was show that, gasp, things happened slightly different that predictions. This is the norm. Scientist go to work to fit models to observations.

Bunch of stupid articles on this subject misrepresenting the truth due to ignorance,
Posted by prattalumni
Member since Sep 2012
772 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

Wrong. The jest has not proven or even suggested the Big Bang theory is wrong.
yeah cuz without that precious big bang, we might have to give credit to a creator.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26056 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

yeah cuz without that precious big bang, we might have to give credit to a creator.

I’ll never understand why these two things are seemingly mutually exclusive to so many people.

If you believe in God, why the frick could he not have acted through the Big Bang/evolution, etc, [insert your scientific theory here]? The existence of one does not prevent the other from also being true.

Unless you’re one of the literal/textualist creationists that thinks everything was created in six days. Then you’re just an idiot.
This post was edited on 9/8/22 at 7:12 pm
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24726 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:11 pm to
Creator could have used a Big Bang, or not. Does it matter? Still fascinating.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115468 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:12 pm to
Yeah, no. That isn’t what it shows at all.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24597 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Wrong. The jest has not proven or even suggested the Big Bang theory is wrong. What it did do was show that, gasp, things happened slightly different that predictions. This is the norm. Scientist go to work to fit models to observations.



Nobody obviously knows what's wrong or right so I'm sure you don't either. Everything has a creator if you believe that space just happened you believe in magic also.
Posted by Tesla
the Laurentian Abyss
Member since Dec 2011
7954 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:15 pm to
I never, NEVER agree with you but we are on the exact same page here. I’ll never understand why some people of faith refuse to think about what the hand of God in action might look like. It’s similar to those who don’t believe in extra terrestrial life but do believe in the angels of the Bible.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56254 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:15 pm to
because it's fricking stupid.
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
32965 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:16 pm to
min watch funny the telescope they built to prove it is actually refuting it with it's discoveries.

How is that funny? The Big Bang is simply an attempt to explain what we do not fully understand.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71198 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:16 pm to
Can’t go to moon but can do this stuff.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24726 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:17 pm to

Narrator has an English accent, so he's got to be right.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11353 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

Unless you’re one of the literal/textualist creationists that thinks everything was created in six days


Relativity has proven how for God 6 days could epochs here. Both things can be true - even Peter says a day is like 1000 years to God. Time is relative and the farther away you are the bigger the time differential
This post was edited on 9/8/22 at 7:24 pm
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24597 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

How is that funny? The Big Bang is simply an attempt to explain what we do not fully understand.



It's funny because according to some people the big bang is irrefutable yet here we are seeing evidence of their theory being debunked. Maybe the big bang was just a huge star going supernova and really had no influence of the maturity of space. Maybe space was always just there. Maybe the way we measure travel in space is not like jumping into a time machine and it's just space that's always been there. One thing for sure is this brings a lot of new questions to the table
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12384 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Creator could have used a Big Bang, or not.
Banging is how most life is created.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67657 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:21 pm to

Simulation Theory crushes both Big Bang and Evolution.
Posted by subotic
Member since Dec 2012
2354 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Unless you’re one of the literal/textualist creationists that thinks everything was created in six days. Then you’re just an idiot.



There is no need to be a smug, smarmy a-hole about it.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11353 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:24 pm to
Simulation theory is basically atheists saying there is a God (intelligent design) without saying it.
Posted by Dkvet
Member since Sep 2020
90 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:26 pm to
Yep, I’m one of those who believe God created the everything in 6 literal days and a young earth.

There is no way to rationalize the scriptures with evolution. The biblical account shows the first man and woman lived between 6000-10,000 years ago counting back generations and ages given in the Bible.

Death didn’t occur until mankind sinned so the fossil records with many layers of dead animals couldn’t have occurred over millions of years. There is another explanation- a worldwide flood in Noah’s day.

There are many scientists who believe in a young earth and refute evolution. The difference is that they look at the same data, but through a worldview that assumes a creator. The evolutionist almost exclusively have an atheist worldview.
Posted by subotic
Member since Dec 2012
2354 posts
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Simulation theory is basically atheists saying there is a God (intelligent design) without saying it.



Exactly. And what boundaries would the Creator have? How could we possible know for sure what he is capable of?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram