re: James webb tele proving big bang theory probably is inaccurate

quote:

---

Wrong. The jest has not proven or even suggested the Big Bang theory is wrong.
yeah cuz without that precious big bang, we might have to give credit to a creator.

---

Big Bang doesn't disprove anything.

Time is meaningless to an all-powerful deity. Him creating everything in 6 days and resting on the 7th is just something they either put in the bible to make the story more understandable for the audience at the time, or he created all this in one of his "days" which can be any length of time to us.

Jesus was a carpenter and by all accounts actually built things, he didn't just snap his fingers and put together a house or table. Who says there wasn't a physical process to creation that we know as the Big Bang, an event that supposedly everything came from in an instant?

quote:

---

quote: in actuality they approach it with an assumption that there is no God/Creator/Designer. They also approach it with the assumption that this isn't all one gigantic computer program or that they're not just a brain in a vat. Until there's reason to consider something, why consider it?

---

Key differences:
(1) There exists reasons for God/Creator/Designer
(2) conscious decision to reject God/Creator/Designer as an option is the pretext that does not allow further investigation

Example: I see fresh 18" humanoid looking footprints. I don't believe in giants, Yetis or Bigfoot. Therefore we will not investigate those possibilities. But we will hypothesize an upright walking bear with deformed feet and no toe nails (apology to Bigfoot fans)

Without even reading the article one should be able to understand it’s fallacies


Theories are constantly being proved “inaccurate” as newer/better data is acquired

It doesn’t mean there wasn’t a Big Bang, but instead just changed our previous understanding