- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith says US Presidents HAVE NO 1st Amendment rights to allege election fraud!!
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:09 am to lsuguy84
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:09 am to lsuguy84
quote:You are mistaken, in large part.
Neither side has properly presented evidence and it has not been litigated to prove either side. It’s not “knowingly false”.
Did you read the indictment?
0
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:09 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
Bless your heart. You truly believe that this piece of shite garbage is innocent.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What's your issue with correcting a lie?
I correct you all the time. For one thing, if you really came within a million miles of being a true conservative, you wouldn't be defending this douchebag 24/7.
Remember when it was announced that Jack Smith was being investigated by the DOJ? Your knee-jerk reaction was to post "Political Theatre."
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:13 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Did you ever bother to read the indictment that he presented against Trump?
Nope - I am only responding to stuff presented in this thread and comparing it to what I have reason to be truth.
Methinks there is a lot of wordsmanship going on here to try covering up the Jack Smith bullshite.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:and it is only fraud if it harms Democrats right?
That is literally not what he said
He said, "We wanted to make clear that this was not about, um, trying to interfere with anyone's first amendment rights" and "fraud is not protected by the first amendment"
It wasn't fraud for Stacey Abrahams to get massive grants after on multiple public stages declare Trump an illegitimate President and filing a lawsuit against the state of GA for election integrity (and being fined $300k for violations). That's not fraud.
To say GA was stolen by Democrats is fraud according to Jack "shite" Smith.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:32 am to Timeoday
That is an incredibly stupid claim to make.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Like clockwork
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:40 am to Stealth Matrix
quote:
Like clockwork
Like a fly to shite, you mean.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:42 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Smith: "A statement made with know falsity is not protected by the First Amendment."
Please share your relentless analysis of the entirety of "Muh Russia" and the ridiculous amount of false statements used to entrap an elected president.
Since you and Jack Smith seem to agree on the importance of the truth.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:43 am to I20goon
quote:Has anyone on this forum asserted that Stacey Abrams (I have no idea who Stacey Abrahams might be) is not a fraudster?
It wasn't fraud for Stacey Abrahams to get massive grants after on multiple public stages declare Trump an illegitimate President and filing a lawsuit against the state of GA for election integrity (and being fined $300k for violations).
What conceivable relevance do you see in this point, other than meaningless whataboutism?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:45 am to tigerfan 64
quote:I have always seen as utter nonsense the claims that Trump is some sort of Russian intelligence asset.
Please share your relentless analysis of the entirety of "Muh Russia"
If someone made such claims with actual knowledge of their falsity (as opposed to opinion), yes, that person would likely be committing fraud.
How is that relevant to this thread?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:48 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
My recollection is that Smith developed facts
Facts are not "developed".
They are discovered and revealed.
Narratives are developed.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:54 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
If someone made such claims with actual knowledge of their falsity (as opposed to opinion), yes, that person would likely be committing fraud.
So basically the entirety of the democrat party and most of the news media?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:54 am to tigerfan 64
quote:You are mistaken, though your post WAS a pithy way of saying that you do not know what your are talking about and will likely garner upvotes from the equally-uninformed. "Developing facts" is common nomenclature in any sort of investigative field.quote:Facts are not "developed".
My recollection is that Smith developed facts
quote:You are welcome.
To "develop facts" means to systematically investigate, gather, organize, and build upon initial information to uncover deeper truths, details, and a comprehensive understanding, often moving from assumptions or simple observations to concrete evidence for planning, legal cases, or scientific inquiry. It's about transforming "messy" real-world information into solid, actionable data through questioning, analysis, and verification.
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 10:58 am
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:55 am to tigerfan 64
quote:
Facts are not "developed".
They are discovered and revealed.
Narratives are developed.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:57 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
My recollection is that Smith developed facts to confirm that Trump had "actual knowledge" that his claims of "election fraud" were utterly baseless.
You’d have to be a special kind of f*cking retard to not fully understand that the 2020 election was filled with MASSIVE F*CKING VOTER FRAUD in every swing state of the country.
How f*cking stupid would someone need to be to think that a dementia-riddled, lying, beyond-f*cking-corrupt, groping rapist got 81 million votes – many of which was in the middle of the night when every swing state just happened to stop counting and kicked out Republican poll watchers so that they could bring in millions of fraudulent ballots.
This only happened in states run by Democrats in the most heavy and corrupt democrat districts and precincts.
Seriously, you’d have to be SFP-level f*cking stupid and retarded to think that the 2020 election was anything but a complete f*cking fraud and sham.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:58 am to MMauler
You seem to have strong opinions on this point.
Biden was elected in 2020 for exactly the reason that Trump was elected in 2016 and 2024. Faced with two shitty options, the US electorate thought that the OTHER option was more shitty still.
Biden was elected in 2020 for exactly the reason that Trump was elected in 2016 and 2024. Faced with two shitty options, the US electorate thought that the OTHER option was more shitty still.
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 11:03 am
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:01 am to Timeoday
What does he think this is, the NCAA?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News