Started By
Message

re: It's a Smart Move to Not Try to Use US Navy to Open the Strait

Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:51 am to
Posted by Sharlo
Van down by the river.
Member since Oct 2021
1616 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Europeans have shirked their defensesive duties at the expense of the US taxpayer since the end of WW2. It is time they re-engage, it will be better for everyone in the long run.


This right here. Why is it incumbent upon us to factor in the EU's needs when they do absolutely nothing for us? Why is it our job to make sure they have cheaper fuel?

They overplayed their hand and should have showed less arse early on. Like this war or not, they have more direct dependencies on ME oil than we do. But it's in vogue for their chirpy little leaders to talk shite and puff their chests out.

Ok, then. You badasses can take care of this and Ukraine, too, while you're at it.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10612 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:53 am to
quote:

The question then becomes...why would they put their own naval assets at risk when they had nothing to do with this war?


because they use the fricking oil

If nobody cares why even reopen it?
Posted by Techdave
Laffy
Member since Apr 2014
794 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:57 am to
quote:

I thought Trump said they were decimated though


He never says we destroyed every drone and missile they have.

And they likely have 100s or 1000s of artillery guns that we haven’t targeted at all.
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 11:59 am
Posted by countrytiger60
Larose
Member since Sep 2018
4460 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:00 pm to
Trump is about to wipe Iran off the map. and it's long overdue!
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32243 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:02 pm to
Because producers in the US are going to sell where they can make the most money. Did you even take a high school level economics course?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138850 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I thought Trump said they were decimated though
The South was decimated, and then Lincoln was assassinated. Japan was decimated, and then sank the Indianapolis. The fact that Iran is decimated is not open for legitimate dispute. That doesn't mean we need to open ourselves up for a lucky shot.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
7132 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:08 pm to
Not disputing that. But considering we have B-52's running sorties on Tehran and A-10 all over the skies of the straits, I don't think the worst case scenario is a reasonable expectation anymore. We can sterilize that whole coast line if we want to. But that won't hold it forever and they'll be terrorizing again. We would have a very hard time stopping them 100% unless the government changed and became friendly.

That's an entirely possible scenario btw.
Posted by LongHornHandy
Member since Jul 2024
364 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

In addition you are now within range of conventional artillery. Which cannot be intercepted or shot down at all.


Looks like CIWS would indeed be able to intercept conventional artillery, so think you’re off base
Posted by justokatgolf
Louisiana
Member since May 2023
97 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:45 pm to
If we don’t need their oil and have our own supply. Couldn’t we pay a domestic price and not the global price?
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
37763 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Iran would like nothing more than to see massive US ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, within striking range..... They would launch 50 drones and missiles at the same time to sink a US ship.



Didn’t Donald and pete say weeks ago that the e decimated their military to complete ineffectiveness?
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30450 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

The US has oil and we need to uncouple from world markets to bring cost to us down


Setting aside the anti-capitalistic issues that idea presents, there is another big issue with energy independence. Where are we going to get the extra-heavy sour crude our refineries are set up for, or where are the incentives or other persuasion for refinery owners to make the switch?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138850 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

The one who miscalculated badly (or not at all) is trump
Trump does not miscalculate often, and NEVER badly
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77595 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

They would launch 50 drones and missiles at the same time

They're not guaranteed to have 50 drones and missiles at their disposal at this point.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173618 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

They're not guaranteed to have 50 drones and missiles at their disposal at this point.

They probably definitely have 50 drones at minimum. If Intel suggested they were out of ammo then they wouldn't be able to control passage through the strait to begin with. I would not be shocked if they still had drones in the thousands.
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
8368 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

I think Trumps point is we don’t rely on oil that comes through there. The only benefit to us patrolling it to keep it open is lower oil prices

Is that worth spending billions more in taxpayer dollars and risking naval assets? Not really. It’s why Trump wants allies to send assets to open it because they benefit more than we do



maybe trump should've thought of all of that before launching this stupid war.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16630 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Did you even take a high school level economics course?

Wait…you think I went to high school?

Posted by FireawayLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2023
1913 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 6:11 pm to
Just carpet bomb the damn island and be done with it.
Posted by Nome tiger
Member since Nov 2014
188 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 6:26 pm to
Thank god someone here has a working brain. I’m so fricking tired of the “we” have oil bullshite. Unless you own the controlling interest in a multinational oil company, then “we” don’t have oil. Last I checked, the US government owned zero drilling rigs and zero refineries. The only thing you should expect is to pay whatever someone else in the entire fricking world will pay minus the cost of transportation for fuel and petroleum products. Global business runs by maximizing revenue not patriotism.
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2963 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:15 pm to
A strike group has 7 to 11 CIWS not 1 or 2. Currently the Naval ships there have 18 CIWS total. I think they would be fine handling 10 rounds. Are they even sure they have enough to fire that many currently?
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2398 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

It’s already open to them, they are strategic allies of Iran


Right.
Which can very easily lead to other nations forging stronger diplomatic ties with Iran if we just leave. Countries who need oil that goes through Hormuz would best start cutting deals with Iran if we leave with the Iranian regime in place.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram