Started By
Message

Israel: 25% increase in cardiac arrests & heart attacks (16-29). 83.6% in women (20-29)

Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:53 am
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:53 am
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61124 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:54 am to
It's easy to get an increase like that when so few have those issues to begin with.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24950 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:55 am to
The truth will come out. This untested vaccine will do more harm than good in the long run.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89483 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:57 am to
quote:

It's easy to get an increase like that when so few have those issues to begin with.




Even easier when you mandate a therapy that is known to increase the risk for blood clots.
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
17773 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:00 am to
Could it be as simple as a huge increase in inactivity due to lockdowns in quarantine
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:01 am to
So heart attacks went down 20% in 2020 and back up 25% in 2021?

Alright.
Posted by CatholicLSUDude
Member since Aug 2018
755 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Could it be as simple as a huge increase in inactivity due to lockdowns in quarantine


In that age group? No way.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50311 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:01 am to
quote:

It's easy to get an increase like that when so few have those issues to begin with.


Did you think this was a good point?
Posted by Chef Curry
Member since Mar 2019
2055 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:01 am to
quote:

The truth will come out. This untested vaccine will do more harm than good in the long run.


They’ll never admit it. At best they will give some watered down version if it ends up being bad.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 9:11 am
Posted by iron banks
Destrehan
Member since Jul 2014
3739 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:01 am to
Friends SIL took the vaccine last week and is currently in the hospital fighting for her life with blood clots. No prior health concerns. Latest media fear got her to go take it. I will take my chances with the 99.6% survival rate.
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
24788 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:02 am to
quote:

tiggerthetooth
you need to accept that the jab is poison
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94908 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:06 am to
This is the same shite liberals did with covid. Use either percentages or gross numbers depending on how scary you want your argument to be

from 35 to 54 is an inconsequential increase

Same with all the number in that age range. Over that population its a completely immaterial increase that doesnt even register when you compare to the total population
Posted by Northwestern tiger
Long Island NY
Member since Oct 2005
23483 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:07 am to
Please provide a link to the study and not some random Twitter pic
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57257 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:08 am to
Where’s the raw data?
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
7558 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:10 am to
quote:

from 35 to 54 is an inconsequential increase


Just so we know, what number would be "consequential"?
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Please provide a link to the study and not some random Twitter pic


Learn how to use the info given to do your own research instead of asking other people to do it for you.

If the info is not legit and you want to disprove it, it wouldn’t be difficult.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 8:13 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57257 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Learn how to use the info given to do your own research instead of asking other people to do it for you.


Ok - give me the link to the raw data and I will research the hell out of it for you
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94908 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:12 am to
Lets say it a different way

in 2020, roughly .00095% of the 16-29 age population had cardiac events in the same time range

In 2021, roughly .0014% of the 16-29 age population had cardiac events in the same time range


These gross numbers are so small, the percentage swings will be massive


Think about this, if you go from 1 death, to 3 deaths, you have A 200% INCREASE IN DEATHS!!!!!!!
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94908 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:13 am to
quote:

Just so we know, what number would be "consequential"?
Something a wee bit more that a 19 person increase over a multiple million population size in that age range
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94908 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 8:14 am to
Also for refernce

2019- 52 deaths
2020-35 deaths
2021-54 deaths

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram