re: Is the only criminal allegation against Moore that he felt up a 14 year old?

quote:

---

sicboy

---

So according to their story now.........

Roy more signed her book when she was 16. She altered that signature in order to remind herself when and where he signed it because she admired him at that time. Now 40 years later, she does not admire him. She now remembers that he "touched her bra" when she was 14.

I'm sorry, but a memory, without corroboration from 25 years ago from a woman with several other accusations to her credit is not sufficient for me to convict a man, period. Add in the Gloria Allred appearance and the fact that they did misrepresent the signature at first makes them even less credible. I don't know who is telling the truth, but I'm no where near convicting Moore on this evidence.

ETA: I see I have the facts of two accusers confused. I'll leave it and face my shame.

quote:

---

I tried to engage you for clarification. You passed, with your default approach of sarcasm. Run along now. You will not derail this thread. Engage or beat it.

---

The 16yo is the one with the yearbook issue--Beverly Nelson. She added some details to what he originally wrote (in a different color, apparently.) She's the one who alleged he shoved her face into his crotch in the car and told her no one would believe her because she was "just a child" and and he's a DA.

quote:

---

and she waited almost 40 years to make the allegations

---

Which ironically fell 30 days before a major election. Some of these dimwit Democrats simply can't put 2 and 2 together.

quote:

---

She admitted that her original statement was a lie.

---

This is the salient point

quote:

---

Yes, thank you. Someone clarified that for me and I responded to their post just a few posts back.

---

No worries. Hard to keep up with earlier posts sometimes.

quote:

---

I just looked at a BBC.com story on the 14year old. Moore denies the allegation, according to the article, but it does seem disturbing. And I mean disturbing all around: on his part, on the girl's part, and on the mother's part. Just weird.

---

Two parts of the 14 year old's story have been the most picked at.

She said she talked to Moore in "her" phone in her bedroom. Her mother said she didn't have a phone in her bedroom at that time, but then in the next sentence, her mother said that the family phone reached into the girl's bedroom.

Secondly, she said that Moore picked her up at an intersection that was right around the corner from her house. The intersection is not just around the corner (some have said it might be as much as a mile away), but I haven't seen it reported that she made a direct comment on that.

For me (and I admit this is a pure judgment call), I think her description of what she says happened at Moore's house is what is her best point. If you read what she says, it doesn't seem to me that she was trying to puff it up to be more than it was. She doesn't appear to be coached to say what she did about that.

Not that this is a big factor, but everyone asks this. She seems to be generally of the Republican persuasion. (She says she voted for Trump, but that is not independently confirmed, however that might be done).

ETA: The allegation that the intersection where the girl said Moore picked her up being a mile from her house came from the Moore campaign.

It turns out that was based on the address where the girl lived in 1981, not in 1979, when the incident happened. In 1979, the location where the girl lived supports her contention that the intersection was just around the corner from her house.

quote:

---

She admitted to writing in it, not forging the signature and the above inscription.

---

But the "/DA" written in a different hand following the signature is pretty strong proof that it was copied from the lying c-unt's court papers.

Nope, the allegation is: she felt him up.