Started By
Message

re: Is the Climate Scam almost over?

Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47890 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:00 pm to
Hope you're sitting down, but no. You're very wrong.

Point is, climate crisis has been a fraud since before day 1. Altering the data, omitting unfavorable data, all to push an agenda.

We not agreeing that there's a 'crisis' doesn't equate to me being anti science, anti knowledge, per your ridiculous but predictable stance.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
174418 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:07 pm to
Why would we want to remove good data though? That's the issue at hand here and it is happening.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93734 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

100%
Another way to put it is that the right encourages and promotes prosperity. ONLY Prosperous people can have the foresight to care about their environment since poor people are only concerned with survival. You can make the argument that the right are the only true “environmentalists” since they are the only ones promoting an economic environment where the the natural world can thrive.
forgot to mention that self-interest dictates when you sell the timber from your land, you plant new ones so you'll have another crop in 15-20 years which also...dum dum dum...keeps brush and older/dead trees cleared.

frick the left and everything they stand for
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47890 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:33 pm to
You know I'm speaking of the Uni of E. Anglia case where data was cherry picked and the scientists were caught red handed. As well as a host of other issues.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95832 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

What was the objective of the scam?


Extra taxation on energy production and usage.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95832 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Why would we want to remove good data though? That's the issue at hand here and it is happening.


It stopped being science and became dogmatic beliefs that could not be questioned (at least the useful idiots on the front line of this scam).

Surely you don't think that Al Gore really believed that while flying around the globe in a private jet to talk about it (or maintain several, well air-conditioned, high carbon demand homes) right? Or that Obama believed it, yet literally spent millions on a mansion right on the beach, do you?

FFS, how dumb are some of y'all?
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 4:52 pm
Posted by Jauquismos
Member since Jul 2023
930 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Everyone with a brain knew it was a scam from the beginning.


FIFY
Posted by theagent39
Member since May 2020
229 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:54 pm to
The Climate scam will NEVER be over with a large group of leftist loons! The weather cult is to invested to ever admit the entire thing was a liberal scam, regardless of how many (52) of their ridiculous doom and gloom predictions turnout to be 100% false.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139655 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

They cut them because the dramatic, civilization-ending predictions they spent years platforming never actually showed up on schedule.
They were NEVER going to show up ... EVER.

Because the anthropogenic climate premise is, and always was, complete redistributional leftist political bullshite!
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
174418 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:58 pm to
The doomsayers are morons. That doesn't mean we should just blatantly ignore all data. There are legit climate issues we should probably keep an eye on. Sticking your head in the sand and pretending everything is fake because the doomers were wrong is an equally silly dogma
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
3035 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

They’ll just move on to the next “existential crisis” of the day.


Read an article earlier today talking about a 1100 year old pyramid in Mexico that partially collapsed in 2024.

It’s being blamed on “climate change”, extended hot weather they believed cracked the seal around the rocks followed by heavy rain.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22810 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

There are legit climate issues we should probably keep an eye on.

What are they?
Posted by lsugorilla
PNW
Member since Sep 2009
6718 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:07 pm to
Why is current administration spending millions gutting the Ocean Observatory Initiative?

Because the data collected supports climate change science.

Why else spend millions gutting a program that is already in place?



Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95832 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

There are legit environmental issues we should probably keep an eye on


FTFY

Overfishing, deoxygenation of the ocean, heavy metals, etc. are serious concerns that the AGW carbon scam draws far too much attention away from.


Carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant. It is a trace atmospheric gas that is REQUIRED for life as we know it to exist on this planet. If anything, a little too little CO2 would be a much bigger problem than a little too much.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478319 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

What are they?


The kelp situation is pretty scary
Posted by MKP2004
Member since Mar 2026
445 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

So many Americans, in particular, deny the reality of manmade global warming, and that the climate continues to change-- for the worse.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139655 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Sticking your head in the sand
Powerman, my head is never "in the sand." Ever. I do not operate that way.

That does not mean I'm right or wrong. But it means I'm respondent to all arguments.

For example, there is no excuse for this BS.
None!

\

Yet it was/is promoted as """science"""
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 5:17 pm
Posted by MKP2004
Member since Mar 2026
445 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Last century the temp raised about 1.5 degrees during which time humanity experienced the greatest increase in standard of living in history…by a large margin.

The next century models predict another 1.5 temp increase, if accurate.

Couple that with the fact that we are still coming out of the Mini Ice Age that lasted for roughly 350 years and didn't end until the late 80's
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18156 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:31 pm to
Yeh. The left ain’t said shite about that or how bad all the data centers

I’m just glad I haven’t run into one of though’s assholes
Posted by Sid E Walker
BackdoorU ©
Member since Nov 2013
25708 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Why is current administration spending millions gutting the Ocean Observatory Initiative?

Because hanging on to it to keep the climate scam going probably costs a lot more than gutting it. And any program with “initiative” in it sounds like it might be a USAID-esque money laundering operation.

quote:

Because the data collected supports climate change science.

The same science that many scientists are now running away from?

quote:

Why else spend millions gutting a program that is already in place?

See above.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram