- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Joe Rogan now a cuck like Qucker Qatarlson?
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:08 am to Mutt Myers
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:08 am to Mutt Myers
quote:
He is the master
I'll take "Things I've never heard before" for $1000.
He seems like a good guy and he's clearly got a formula that works, and good for him. But he's not an intellectually curious person and I'm not sure he could be if he tried.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:17 am to Zgeo
quote:
Trump is avoiding a nuclear war a few years down the road, by taking out the radical idealoques that were making nuclear bombs and missles while chanting “ death to. America”.
Trump withdrew the US from the JCPOA in 2018. Iran has had 7-8 years to enrich uranium at the levels needed to create a weapon.
The US bombed their enrichment facility at Fordow in 2025.
Yet, the line from this administration and Bibi is that Iran “is weeks away” from creating a weapon.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:19 am to Mutt Myers
quote:
Short answer : yes. He knows how to get both sides worked up into a frenzy. He is the master at trying to stay neutral and not showing his true identity. At heart, he is all dem.
Just like Qucker.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:20 am to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
Trump withdrew the US from the JCPOA in 2018.
That deal wasn't serious at all. I think people that even use that as some kind of argument should be really ashamed of themselves. It also proves you don't even really know the framework of the deal.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:23 am to lsusteve1
quote:
There’s not a politician alive or dead that hasn’t
Even George Washington lied about cutting down the cherry tree.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:42 am to JellyRoll
quote:
That deal wasn't serious at all. I think people that even use that as some kind of argument should be really ashamed of themselves. It also proves you don't even really know the framework of the deal.
Never argued it was a “good” deal. If anything it never addressed their missile development and proxy networks. My understanding it was tu cap the amount of material that could be enriched to weapons grade.
Whether it would work long term was very questionable.
However, why didn’t they develop a weapon? If JCPOA was a “joke” and Trump’s preference for “maximum pressure” was the the most effective strategy why the need for Epic Fury.
And, guess you never answered, the strike on Fordow supposedly crippled their program. Which one is it?
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:55 am to BluegrassCardinal
The only effective way to stop Iran was always only going to be an epic fury.
The regime wouldn't have capitulated to any type of written deal. The JCPOA was an absolute joke. The strike on Fordow did not obviously cripple them. Then negotiations were had and I had no hope of anything coming from that. I think Trump knew as well which is why we were building up while negotiating.
This too will be a failure if there is no real regime change.
That's the thing with this Iranian regime. They thought they were untouchable and could take on the United States. This all should have happened 47 years ago when Reagan came into office. Just for the mere fact they took our people hostage.
Yet here we are, and Trump even said in 2015 he felt we would probably need to use military to take care of Iran. I would have been suspect of a Trump deal being struck. I never trust Iran. I wasn't convinced we "obliterated" their capabilities at Fordow..
The JCPOA was a horrible deal from the get go.
I will add that the only reason Obama did the deal was to give him cover to ease the sanctions. I would even say he wanted Iran to become a nuclear power and be able to really be a danger to israel. If you really break down the JCPOA it had nothing to it. It was hollow, toothless, and really unenforceable. Could be broken any time, it wasn't even a treaty. Just an executive document.
The regime wouldn't have capitulated to any type of written deal. The JCPOA was an absolute joke. The strike on Fordow did not obviously cripple them. Then negotiations were had and I had no hope of anything coming from that. I think Trump knew as well which is why we were building up while negotiating.
This too will be a failure if there is no real regime change.
That's the thing with this Iranian regime. They thought they were untouchable and could take on the United States. This all should have happened 47 years ago when Reagan came into office. Just for the mere fact they took our people hostage.
Yet here we are, and Trump even said in 2015 he felt we would probably need to use military to take care of Iran. I would have been suspect of a Trump deal being struck. I never trust Iran. I wasn't convinced we "obliterated" their capabilities at Fordow..
The JCPOA was a horrible deal from the get go.
I will add that the only reason Obama did the deal was to give him cover to ease the sanctions. I would even say he wanted Iran to become a nuclear power and be able to really be a danger to israel. If you really break down the JCPOA it had nothing to it. It was hollow, toothless, and really unenforceable. Could be broken any time, it wasn't even a treaty. Just an executive document.
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 10:06 am
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:57 am to theballguy
Yes, Joe is still a Bernie cuck on some issues. He is buddies with Dave Smith and thinks the Israel and the Js are the most evil people on the planet and controlling Trump and the U.S...
IDS and Jtardism is rampant out there right now.
IDS and Jtardism is rampant out there right now.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:57 am to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
You should go ask Rogan about it in person.
I would if I could.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:58 am to theballguy
At this point i dont care what Rogan says
This has long ago stopped being cool edgy influencer stuff influencing.
Just like the other military conflicts of WW3 OMG OH NOES.
This has long ago stopped being cool edgy influencer stuff influencing.
Just like the other military conflicts of WW3 OMG OH NOES.
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 9:59 am
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:58 am to MichaelScottsMug
quote:
So it makes someone a cuck to not agree with everything Trump does?
If they're being cucks about it, yes.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:01 am to BamaCoaster
quote:
2. If Trump is doing this to frick China, but can’t say it aloud, then I’m good with it, as the country should be.
That is 100% a key component of all this. Same with Venezuela... Greenland etc. As well as taking out a psycho islamist regime that has murdered hundreds of thousands of people, including Americans over the years, and has vowed "Death to America" and to wipe the U.S.A. off the map, along with Israel.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:24 am to JellyRoll
quote:
That's the thing with this Iranian regime. They thought they were untouchable and could take on the United States. This all should have happened 47 years ago when Reagan came into office. Just for the mere fact they took our people hostages.
Trump's maximum pressure campaign would have been more effective than a regime change. How do we accomplish that without a major ground offensive? Air strikes have not taken the regime out (yet). Intel release yesterday mentioned that the regime is still intact and has control of the population.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:32 am to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
Trump's maximum pressure campaign would have been more effective than a regime change
Nope, sorry, nothing on paper was going to stop the regime from their goals.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:36 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
bullshite
Compelling evidence you’ve provided here, wow. You’ve flipped my entire perception of this saga on its head.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:37 pm to theballguy
Based on the snippet OP posted, I dont see a problem with what he said.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:39 pm to theballguy
Joe Rogan is unmoored from ideology. This is a sign of a shallow thinker. He’s a smart guy, though. Just don’t expect a consistent philosophy based on certitudes developed over a lifetime of thoughtful contemplation.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:07 pm to Old Character
quote:
it was an irrational promise and it’s childish to think that a world superpower could just say “no more wars” and all of a sudden the rest of the world is rainbows and unicorns.
Honestly, this is probably one of the more legitimate and fair criticisms of President Trump. He often uses hyperbole and inflated statements that come back to bite him in the butt, even if things are going well. I was in a thread earlier today where people were mad at him because they "haven't seen the promised mass deportations." Well, the numbers show that Trump is on pace to out-deport Obama by 70% and Biden by 92% but terminolgy like the ones he used leaves a ton of room for interpretation and allows for disappointment where it maybe doesn't need to be.
As far as the no new wars, that's another example of not being clear in his wording. He said on the campaign trail many times that he would be willing to use military force against Iran if diplomacy failed. He also said no new wars though so what are we to make of that? I think it leans towards the specific portion where he mentioned no new forever wars and endless wars in the ME. If this Iran things spins into a multi-year issue, absolutely he deserves criticism. If Iran was being an arse in negotiations and we bomb them for a month or so to show we mean business, he did say that would be on the table during the campaign.
I suppose I'm willing to let this play out with Iran before going all in on an opinion and if it turns out to be a war that drags on for years, I'd be more than willing to criticize Trump for it.
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 3/12/26 at 3:08 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Compelling evidence you’ve provided here, wow. You’ve flipped my entire perception of this saga on its head.
Read 2 replies up:
quote:
What precisely did they violate?
quote:
2015 JCPOA: Iran agreed to implement the Additional Protocol, providing the IAEA with "unfettered" access to nuclear facilities and, under special procedures, access to suspicious, non-nuclear sites.
Limitations: Despite agreements, Iran consistently claimed military sites were off-limits and often restricted IAEA access to cameras and monitoring equipment.
Sure...you can come inspect our nuclear enrichment...BUT...not there. Why would we keep our enriched materials on a military base??
Popular
Back to top



0







