- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Institute for the study of war - MOU is essentially a US surrender
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:54 pm
We traded (temporarily) lower gas prices and a higher stock market for the complete rebuild of the Iranian military, unlimited ballistic missiles/drones, control of the SOH, and a pathway to a nuclear bomb.
The JCPOA was bad. This is in a different stratosphere of awful. We surrendered and got nothing while they got stronger. This is a sad time in US history.
The JCPOA was bad. This is in a different stratosphere of awful. We surrendered and got nothing while they got stronger. This is a sad time in US history.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 5:56 pm
16
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:55 pm to Stidham8
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:56 pm to Stidham8
Patience. This movie isn’t over, patriot.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:56 pm to Stidham8
They’re not wrong. When the United States had Iran on the ropes in April, who would ever look at this deal and think it represents a negotiated outcome in any way beneficial to the supposed victor?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:57 pm to Stidham8
Iran will violate this within a week so dont know why it matters
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:57 pm to Stidham8
I’m definitely on the right, but this deal makes me think whoever was involved with it (JD Vance?) is a complete idiot and judging by these threads and the up/down votes in them some good portion of the right agrees with me. Give me Rubio in 2028.
This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:57 pm to Stidham8
What the frick???. Lol
Print that shite out on paper and wipe ur arse with it!!! Lol
Print that shite out on paper and wipe ur arse with it!!! Lol
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:59 pm to Stidham8
All that may be true.
But what do you do when the people paying the bills for total war don’t want one and would vote in November to shut it down no matter what.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:01 pm to Stidham8
But the bombs man. Remember all the bombs? That’s how we know we won.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:01 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
But what do you do when the people paying the bills for total war don’t want one and would vote in November to shut it down no matter what.
You have to admit starting the war was a huge mistake, for starters.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:01 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
All that may be true. But what do you do when the people paying the bills for total war don’t want one and would vote in November to shut it down no matter what.
We became a cuck around April. They would have capitulated by now had we not been a b and agreeing to a ceasefire. Instead we finally signed the 39th, but “beautiful”, deal.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:02 pm to bigblake
quote:
I’m definitely on the right, but this deal makes me think whoever was involved with it (JD Vance?) is a complete idiot and judging by these threads and the up/down votes in them some good portion of the right agrees with me. Give me Rubio in 2028.
Vance is more worried about the economy and gas prices heading into 2028 than he is about finishing a major US geopolitical objective that should’ve been dealt with YEARS ago. We friggin surrendered.
Rubio wouldn’t have done this.
This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:02 pm to Stidham8
quote:
We surrendered and got nothing while they got stronger.
There has to be a point where people can't be stupider than they were yesterday.
But we're not there yet.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:03 pm to Stidham8
Institute for the study of war is a neo communist globalist think tank. frick em
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:03 pm to Stidham8
quote:
Institute for the study of war -
Cut thr crap with all the I don't like it
threàds. No one càres...Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:04 pm to Stidham8
Yeah we surrendered after destroying billions in military infrastructure and much more. So stupid
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:07 pm to bigblake
quote:
but this deal makes me think whoever was involved with it (JD Vance?) is a complete idiot
JD hasn't been in negotiations since the 1st meeting. This is Jared Kushner (who is literally employed by ME countries and Bessent (?)
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:13 pm to Stidham8
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:14 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:Yeah. Bill Kristol and David Patreus are famous Comminists.
Institute for the study of war is a neo communist globalist think tank. frick em
They are a warhawk group who don't think we go to war enough and are disappointed that we didn't bomb Iran even more.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News