- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In today's world, how would the American public view the following...?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:16 pm
Gen. Allen
Gen MacArthur
Gen Patton
Gen Bradley
Gen Marshall
Adm. Halsey
Air Marshal Harris
Air Marshal Bottomley
Just based on the way they waged war and took control of things.
I have no real use for MacArthur, who abandoned his men to die.
I am sure Bottomley and Harris would be considered war criminals for their role in Dresden.
Gen MacArthur
Gen Patton
Gen Bradley
Gen Marshall
Adm. Halsey
Air Marshal Harris
Air Marshal Bottomley
Just based on the way they waged war and took control of things.
I have no real use for MacArthur, who abandoned his men to die.
I am sure Bottomley and Harris would be considered war criminals for their role in Dresden.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:24 pm to sms151t
Knowing how things turned out in 2026 America and the West…
…would you have gotten on a boat for D-Day?
…would you have gotten on a boat for D-Day?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:34 pm to sms151t
"Moronica Progtard reporting from Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. There are unconfirmed reports of armed white gangs attacking Japanese air crews. Fears mount that this may lead to further attacks on undocumented migrants of color. Back to you in the studio"
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:43 pm to sms151t
“WAR CRIMINALS! REEEEEEEEEE!!!”
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:46 pm to sms151t
quote:
Gen MacArthur
Define “today’s” world, because there’s been dozens of threads in the past decade and the consensus around here has always leaned POS.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:47 pm to sms151t
It depends on who is looking through the lens.
Most normal God fearing folks would continue to look at these men as heroes.
The limp wristed twats on the left would have a different. But I don’t really care what pussies think.
Most normal God fearing folks would continue to look at these men as heroes.
The limp wristed twats on the left would have a different. But I don’t really care what pussies think.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:39 pm to sms151t
Has anyone said “They’d matriculate perfectly, present day, and just as it is now they were mere puppets to globalist puppet masters”?? ……the only difference being every person in the room was chain smoking then.
Any said that yet? Or anything along the lines of puppets, puppet masters, globalists, cabals etc? Surely I’m not the first.
Any said that yet? Or anything along the lines of puppets, puppet masters, globalists, cabals etc? Surely I’m not the first.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:25 pm to sms151t
quote:
In today's world, how would the American public view the following...?
Just read the posts here about Israel and the US military interventions in Iran and Gaza.
It's not a mystery.
Look up Operation Meetinghouse from WWII. Over 100,000 civilian casualties in one night. Left a million Japanese civilians homeless.
And it was deliberate.
Not saying that was a good thing, but people used to understand that people—including innocent civilians—died when a nation went to war. That's one of the big reasons you would try to avoid going to war.
Now a stray bomb accidentally hits a school in an isolated incident and 120 children die and people run around screaming "War Crimes."
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:22 am to sms151t
They would view your list as lacking diversity!
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:38 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Not saying that was a good thing, but people used to understand that people—including innocent civilians—died when a nation went to war. That's one of the big reasons you would try to avoid going to war.
THIS is the universal repulsion to actual war - it means that innocent civilians are merely another resource to be managed - war means eliminate the enemy as the only goal.
That is why it is to be avoided at all costs = up until that cost cannot be borne anymore
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:13 am to sms151t
I'll never have a rosy view of targeting and mass murdering civilians. I also find those who hold themselves as moral while championing such things to be either confused or liars.
Apply that as you like.
Apply that as you like.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:17 am to sms151t
Considering that most of those generals were killing white men they’d be criticized for not being brutal enough
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:30 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Not saying that was a good thing, but people used to understand that people—including innocent civilians—died when a nation went to war. That's one of the big reasons you would try to avoid going to war
Not many nations have ever cared about the common populace during war. The people did not go to war. The country and its leaders did. The people were just forced to fight and suffer.
Basically people here are comparing a time when there were no guided weapons to today. Today we can surgically strike anywhere at any time. There is less war today than at any other time in history because world leaders now know that they can easily become targets while the people are left alone.
There is less war today than any other time in history because of the endgame weapons. So yeah, ask for total war today. You won't like what it will cost you. The endgame costs everything.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:00 am to sms151t
Give me Bradley, Patton, and Halsey any day.
Bradley would go over fine, the other two no so much, lol.
Bradley would go over fine, the other two no so much, lol.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:08 am to UtahCajun
quote:
The endgame costs everything.
Which is exactly why I don't have the slightest problem bombing Iran in an attempt to keep them from attaining nuclear weapons.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:26 am to sms151t
For some reason General Patton was not "allowed" to come back home to America. I wonder why?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:45 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Which is exactly why I don't have the slightest problem bombing Iran in an attempt to keep them from attaining nuclear weapons.
So if our corrupt intelligence agencies told you Turdukenstan sought a nuclear weapon, you're all in on unprevoked war? What about North Korea? China? Russia? Should we start world war three because they MIGHT use a nuke on us?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:58 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Which is exactly why I don't have the slightest problem bombing Iran in an attempt to keep them from attaining nuclear weapons.
I do not believe anyone wants them to have nukes.
As to the topic of the OP, all were great men doing a hard job. I have respect for all and would have loved to serve under Patton. MacArthur, not so much. Nothing against him, but everything against his theater. Never did have an urge to go to the S. Pacific, much less fight there.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:13 am to AUCom96
quote:
So if our corrupt intelligence agencies told you Turdukenstan sought a nuclear weapon, you're all in on unprevoked war? What about North Korea? China? Russia? Should we start world war three because they MIGHT use a nuke on us?
I will answer every one of your very bad faith, intentionally mischaracterized questions if you will answer one for me first:
What is your understanding of the global effect of a nuclear exchange between Israel and Iran and the impact it would have on the US?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:14 am to UtahCajun
quote:
I do not believe anyone wants them to have nukes.
Awesome, but that's not what I said.
I said I have no problem attempting to do something about it. Not just "not wanting" it.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 9:15 am
Popular
Back to top

12










