Started By
Message

In today's world, how would the American public view the following...?

Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:16 pm
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
141037 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:16 pm
Gen. Allen
Gen MacArthur
Gen Patton
Gen Bradley
Gen Marshall
Adm. Halsey
Air Marshal Harris
Air Marshal Bottomley

Just based on the way they waged war and took control of things.

I have no real use for MacArthur, who abandoned his men to die.
I am sure Bottomley and Harris would be considered war criminals for their role in Dresden.

Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
3901 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:24 pm to
Knowing how things turned out in 2026 America and the West…

…would you have gotten on a boat for D-Day?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159330 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:34 pm to
"Moronica Progtard reporting from Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. There are unconfirmed reports of armed white gangs attacking Japanese air crews. Fears mount that this may lead to further attacks on undocumented migrants of color. Back to you in the studio"
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
23595 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:43 pm to
“WAR CRIMINALS! REEEEEEEEEE!!!”
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5638 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Gen MacArthur


Define “today’s” world, because there’s been dozens of threads in the past decade and the consensus around here has always leaned POS.
Posted by Django Unchained
Member since Sep 2025
1176 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:47 pm to
It depends on who is looking through the lens.

Most normal God fearing folks would continue to look at these men as heroes.

The limp wristed twats on the left would have a different. But I don’t really care what pussies think.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
37586 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:39 pm to
Has anyone said “They’d matriculate perfectly, present day, and just as it is now they were mere puppets to globalist puppet masters”?? ……the only difference being every person in the room was chain smoking then.


Any said that yet? Or anything along the lines of puppets, puppet masters, globalists, cabals etc? Surely I’m not the first.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 10:44 pm
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
15018 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

In today's world, how would the American public view the following...?


Just read the posts here about Israel and the US military interventions in Iran and Gaza.

It's not a mystery.

Look up Operation Meetinghouse from WWII. Over 100,000 civilian casualties in one night. Left a million Japanese civilians homeless.

And it was deliberate.

Not saying that was a good thing, but people used to understand that people—including innocent civilians—died when a nation went to war. That's one of the big reasons you would try to avoid going to war.

Now a stray bomb accidentally hits a school in an isolated incident and 120 children die and people run around screaming "War Crimes."

Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
118127 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:22 am to
They would view your list as lacking diversity!
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49911 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:38 am to
quote:

Not saying that was a good thing, but people used to understand that people—including innocent civilians—died when a nation went to war. That's one of the big reasons you would try to avoid going to war.

THIS is the universal repulsion to actual war - it means that innocent civilians are merely another resource to be managed - war means eliminate the enemy as the only goal.

That is why it is to be avoided at all costs = up until that cost cannot be borne anymore
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
7272 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:13 am to
I'll never have a rosy view of targeting and mass murdering civilians. I also find those who hold themselves as moral while championing such things to be either confused or liars.

Apply that as you like.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60410 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:17 am to
Considering that most of those generals were killing white men they’d be criticized for not being brutal enough
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
7661 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Not saying that was a good thing, but people used to understand that people—including innocent civilians—died when a nation went to war. That's one of the big reasons you would try to avoid going to war

Not many nations have ever cared about the common populace during war. The people did not go to war. The country and its leaders did. The people were just forced to fight and suffer.

Basically people here are comparing a time when there were no guided weapons to today. Today we can surgically strike anywhere at any time. There is less war today than at any other time in history because world leaders now know that they can easily become targets while the people are left alone.

There is less war today than any other time in history because of the endgame weapons. So yeah, ask for total war today. You won't like what it will cost you. The endgame costs everything.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
26878 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:00 am to
Give me Bradley, Patton, and Halsey any day.

Bradley would go over fine, the other two no so much, lol.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
15018 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:08 am to
quote:

The endgame costs everything.


Which is exactly why I don't have the slightest problem bombing Iran in an attempt to keep them from attaining nuclear weapons.

Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
26179 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:26 am to
For some reason General Patton was not "allowed" to come back home to America. I wonder why?
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
7272 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Which is exactly why I don't have the slightest problem bombing Iran in an attempt to keep them from attaining nuclear weapons.



So if our corrupt intelligence agencies told you Turdukenstan sought a nuclear weapon, you're all in on unprevoked war? What about North Korea? China? Russia? Should we start world war three because they MIGHT use a nuke on us?
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
7661 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Which is exactly why I don't have the slightest problem bombing Iran in an attempt to keep them from attaining nuclear weapons.

I do not believe anyone wants them to have nukes.

As to the topic of the OP, all were great men doing a hard job. I have respect for all and would have loved to serve under Patton. MacArthur, not so much. Nothing against him, but everything against his theater. Never did have an urge to go to the S. Pacific, much less fight there.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
15018 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:13 am to
quote:

So if our corrupt intelligence agencies told you Turdukenstan sought a nuclear weapon, you're all in on unprevoked war? What about North Korea? China? Russia? Should we start world war three because they MIGHT use a nuke on us?


I will answer every one of your very bad faith, intentionally mischaracterized questions if you will answer one for me first:

What is your understanding of the global effect of a nuclear exchange between Israel and Iran and the impact it would have on the US?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
15018 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

I do not believe anyone wants them to have nukes.


Awesome, but that's not what I said.

I said I have no problem attempting to do something about it. Not just "not wanting" it.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 9:15 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram