- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In other news... 7th. Circuit (Illinois) enjoins Florida state court RICO action
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:52 pm
against American Academy of Pediatrics over "gender affirming" care.
ANTITRUST—7th Cir.: Seventh Circuit... | VitalLaw.com LINK
ANTITRUST—7th Cir.: Seventh Circuit... | VitalLaw.com LINK
5
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:03 pm to udtiger
K. Ima need one of the lawyer baws to explain how 7th circuit enjoind a fl state court. The 11th i would buy but illinois?
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:12 pm to DeplorableTerrorizer
quote:
The Academy, the largest professional association of pediatricians in the United States that maintains its headquarters in Illinois, then filed suit in the federal district court in Illinois against the Florida Attorney General.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:18 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:Illinois?
The Academy, the largest professional association of pediatricians in the United States that maintains its headquarters in Illinois, then filed suit in the federal district court in Illinois against the Florida Attorney General.
I get that they are hq there. What i dont understand in how that allows the 7th circuit to impede on fl state laws being violated. If I broke a law in fl I dont get to fight it in a different state
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:03 pm to udtiger
Honestly, cannot believe it made it through the fed circuit court up to the 7th and they agreed regarding the frivilous and bad faith nature of the claims in Florida state court.
In reading the RICO and FDUPTA allegations, it just seems that a law in Florida making it a crime to recommend any gender affirming care would have nipped it in the bud as any pediatrician making the recommendation would be charged.
The 7th Circuit is considered slightly liberal. I might argue otherwise as more liberal.
Now it appears there will be a hearing on the injunction and a trial up there. Not sure Florida wants that.
In reading the RICO and FDUPTA allegations, it just seems that a law in Florida making it a crime to recommend any gender affirming care would have nipped it in the bud as any pediatrician making the recommendation would be charged.
The 7th Circuit is considered slightly liberal. I might argue otherwise as more liberal.
Now it appears there will be a hearing on the injunction and a trial up there. Not sure Florida wants that.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:05 pm to dafif
quote:
Not sure Florida wants that
It's going to SCOTUS, it's a guaranteed win.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:09 pm to udtiger
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:38 pm to dafif
quote:
Now it appears there will be a hearing on the injunction and a trial up there. Not sure Florida wants that.
Presuming SCOTUS affirms the exercise of jurisdiction.
Pro tip, federal courts tend to be very conservative when it comes to the exercise of jurisdiction, especially where there is a colorable basis for state jurisdicrion.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:48 pm to udtiger
All Florida has to do to stop this is have the legislature establish a civil cause of action making this medical malpractice and the plaintiff’s bar will do the rest.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 5:48 am to udtiger
quote:The 7th Circuit ruling will be overturned.
7th. Circuit (Illinois) enjoins Florida state court RICO action
But frankly, that is not enough. Justices responsible for the idiotic ruling should get an absolute stomping from SCOTUS
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:01 am to DeplorableTerrorizer
quote:
K. Ima need one of the lawyer baws to explain how 7th circuit enjoind a fl state court. The 11th i would buy but illinois?
I am leaving for work in 5 minutes, but extremely briefly, I imagine they used Younger v Harris, which has a bad-faith carve out. This basically says a federal ct can enjoin a state court in a criminal or quasi-criminal action that appears to be brought for the purpose of harrassment/no clear chance of success or a pattern of abuse. In these cases, it allows the fed ct an exception to provide equitable relief.
I will try to swing back during the day or this evening if questions come up.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:09 am to Narax
From your lips to God's ears.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:13 am to Narax
quote:
t's going to SCOTUS, it's a guaranteed win.
Going to SCOTUS on a temporary injunction when they are going on vacation until October ....
The full hearing on the temporary injunction can take place next month and then up to the 7th if granted and probably make it to SCOTUS by December
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:15 am to Obtuse1
quote:\
I am leaving for work in 5 minutes, but extremely briefly, I imagine they used Younger v Harris,
exactly what was done here
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:28 am to Obtuse1
Ok. I can grasp that but shouldn't it have to he the fed circuit court the state is covered by
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:33 am to cadillacattack
We have world renouned doctors on the PT that I am sure would reject her as a quack.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:01 am to DeplorableTerrorizer
quote:
Ok. I can grasp that but shouldn't it have to he the fed circuit court the state is covered by
A Fed Ct can enjoin any state court if it has in personam jurisdiction over the parties. The 7th Cir would have ruled that the Federal District Ct has in personam jurisdiction over the Florida State AG under either the Federal or Illinois long arm statute.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News