- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In Montreal, you can’t have a Christian singer have a worship service in a Church
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Thanks man!
Posted on 7/27/25 at 12:09 am to Rebel
Starting to understand the numbers.
quote:
456453 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 12:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Thought a lot about a new Civ4 strategy I'm going to try tomorrow
That is so on brand.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 12:39 am to SlowFlowPro
The Canadian Supreme Court is a brazen affront to the Western spirit of the law at this point. It’s very obvious to rational people (apparently no longer including yourself?) that having a guest speaker in a church swept up by the law is a ridiculous action when compared to the abomination of excused rape in the same region. Rape cases of minors in Montreal increased by over 100% between 2016 and 2022. But sure, those permits are iron clad for guest preachers. You have no idea of the despotism you support, even in indifferent online contrarianism.
This post was edited on 7/27/25 at 12:42 am
Posted on 7/27/25 at 2:21 am to Rebel
quote:
my bad. someone must've told me a yarn.
Proud Christian and American standing by..
This post was edited on 7/27/25 at 2:41 am
Posted on 7/27/25 at 6:20 am to GatorOnAnIsland
Good Morning, so what I see now,In Canada, you gotta have a permit to sing songs to or about God in a church which preaches the Gospel ( Jesus Christ and Him crucified) on a Saturday. But if a church wants to have a service with drag queens performing, no permit required.
LINK to no permit required
LINK to no permit required
Posted on 7/27/25 at 6:24 am to the808bass
quote:
That would explain some of his posts. I don’t think it would explain all.
Well him being fricked in the head explains the rest.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 6:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
An "event" or "concert"
So, singing?
Posted on 7/27/25 at 6:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which law? I'm willing to look it over once you post it. What you posted didn't apply.
Why don’t you post the law that was broken?
Posted on 7/27/25 at 6:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:of course anything uncomfortable to your position is just hand-waved away. Your TDS is the reason this thread is almost 40 pages. You try and ignore it but there's literally nothing you aren't willing to sacrifice (including honesty as you've been caught lying multiple times) if even cheetoh-adjacent is involved.
I noticed you cut out the reasons for the leftist trash revoking the permits.
Because that's irrelevant to the discussion of this event.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
It was denied for purely political reasons.
Even if I agreed fully, my point stands.
A discussion about those permits is separate from this incident.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:03 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
so even if the state acted in bad faith you still support it.
No. That's not what I said.
I said even if the state acted in bad faith in an unrelated incident, it remains unrelated and not applicable to this discussion. No comment about support.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:05 am to UsingUpAllTheLetters
quote:TDS will literally sacrifice anything
But sure, those permits are iron clad for guest preachers. You have no idea of the despotism you support, even in indifferent online contrarianism.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:06 am to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
But if a church wants to have a service with drag queens performing, no permit required.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:09 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
TDS will literally sacrifice anything
No my personal policy preferences have already been discussed in here, a few times. As I said, I don't think churches get special treatment, otherwise you permit things like the Satanic Temple from being able to perform abortions in states like Louisiana (citation already provided a page or 2 back. It's a real argument they're making based on the "we're a church so the rules don't apply to use" ruse).
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:09 am to UncleFestersLegs
Nothing in that link discussed the permit status. The petition was to the religious authority involved.
This post was edited on 7/27/25 at 7:10 am
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:so the permit that you've yammered on about fire 40 pages is unrelated. Got it
quote:
so even if the state acted in bad faith you still support it.
No. That's not what I said.
I said even if the state acted in bad faith in an unrelated incident
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:14 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
so the permit that you've yammered on about fire 40 pages is unrelated
Unrelated to an incident that was in a different location, at at a different time, which did get a permit (that was revoked)
Yes. That is completely unrelated to the incident at the church where a permit wasn't applied for/granted.
What's the factual overlap other than the singer and his concert tour?
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:14 am to SlowFlowPro
After seeing this at the top of the 1st page with you being the most recent post, I realized that you woke up on a Sunday morning and immediately ran back to this thread.
Like I said, I find your combination of arrogance and autism to be most fascinating.
Like I said, I find your combination of arrogance and autism to be most fascinating.
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:so a permit isn't universally required?
Nothing in that link discussed the permit status
Popular
Back to top


0







