- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
On the flip side, what could occur in a church and not be considered service? It seems the recurring theme countering my points is this is exclusively up to the. Church to decide. Their building. Their rules. Laws cannot apply to them.
quote:
Let's see if you make it 3x
It’s pathetic you keep posting this as though it’s some sort of gotcha. It’s a stupid hypothetical that has nothing to do with the discussion.
Instead of dealing with some stupid hypothetical, let’s deal with the actual event. And the actual event that took place was a Christian music event, held in a Christian Church, and attended by Christians for the purpose of worshipping Jesus Christ.
They were not there for entertainment.
They were there to worship. An act protected by both Canadian and American law.
It didn’t take place in a pubic space. Not a park, not a concert hall, not a gymnasium, not an amphitheater. It was a Church. And it was worship, not a “show.”
To argue otherwise requires a level of dishonesty, and willingness to make a complete arse of one’s self that is frankly breathtaking.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:keep holding that rope. they got a ticket
quote:
Yep the event took place anyway.
Not to completion, due to the legal issues involved.
I noticed you cut out the reasons for the leftist trash revoking the permits. Too embarrassing for you to be in lockstep with cultural Marxists? Embrace that garbage. They even said the dudes support of Trump was a reason to cancel his dates. That's right up your alley
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:and why would a hastily organized event be necessary?
In fact, this concert usurped regularly-scheduled events they DO have every week
quote:this is the only reason you give a shite. 36 pages of your pathological TDS. Now tell us about your life long committment to free speech and how much you abhor cancel culture Miss Bootlicker Libertarian
Feucht’s controversial views and his status as a rising star in the MAGA movement have led officials to cancel his concerts in several Canadian cities in recent days.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:20 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
It didn’t take place in a pubic space. Not a park, not a concert hall, not a gymnasium, not an amphitheater. It was a Church. And it was worship, not a “show.”
This is the hurdle SlowFlowOweO can't quite get over. Canadian law protects religious observance. Their own official interjected politics into the equation, not the church.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
You've been consistently posting in this thread for 12 hours.
Wow
Wow
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:24 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
this is the only reason you give a shite. 36 pages of your pathological TDS. Now tell us about your life long committment to free speech and how much you abhor cancel culture Miss Bootlicker Libertarian
Imagine being stupid enough to claim to be a libertarian and at the same time spend literally an entire Saturday on a message board arguing how it’s OK for the state to shut down a church service because they don’t have a fictional “permit” to hold a church service.
That’s SFP in a nutshell.
ETA: he also claims to be a lawyer, yet another lie.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:27 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:obviously he has a more expert knowledge of the nuances of what actually constitutes religious observance especially as to the musical components of such activities. Clearly a ticket was an appropriate response to criminals worshipping illegally.
This is the hurdle SlowFlowOweO can't quite get over. Canadian law protects religious observance
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If we find out it's the same sets playing the same songs as his other tour dates, with nothing else changed, would you concede then that this is a concert and not a legitimate worship service of the church?
What if he uses concert and worship service interchangeably?
(He does. Like every Christian artist that focuses on the genre of worship music.)
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:34 pm to Chancellor
quote:
This motherfricker, right here, though. Poor bastard has to be the worst, most incompetent fake, pretend-internet-attorney in the history of fake, pretend-internet-attorneys- and that’s a VERY high bar considering that dumb son of a bitch Boosie also posts, here.
He’s really a lawyer. He just has the biggest ego of probably any lawyer you’ve met. So he’s still on page 37 of this thread desperately trying to win an argument he lost somewhere around p. 8.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:34 pm to GRTiger
quote:pathological TDS. His singular unflagging raison d'etre
You've been consistently posting in this thread for 12 hours.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:37 pm to the808bass
quote:he lost it exactly 11 hours ago on page 1
argument he lost somewhere around p. 8.
quote:
posted by SlowFlowPro
7/26/25 at 11:37am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Why would a church need a permit for a singer?
You have to have permits for events universally
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're trying to spin it as just "singing", while a larger event (show, concert, etc.) would require a permit
You keep saying this.
It wasn’t a “larger event.” Their auditorium easily held the 100 people there. There was no ticketing for the event. There was no need for police to handle the concert/worship event traffic or crowd. The church already has an occupancy permit for the people attending.
There was no need for a permit. And I believe that this will be borne out by the legal events forthcoming.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
On the flip side, what could occur in a church and not be considered service? It seems the recurring theme countering my points is this is exclusively up to the. Church to decide. Their building. Their rules. Laws cannot apply to them.
I think it would have to be something commercial. Like renting out their community hall for something completely outside the remit of a church. Not Bingo by the Knights of Columbus or a kids fair by the local Christian school - but an event or exhibit that has nothing to do with the furtherance of Christianity.
If a church hosts anything within the remit of furthering Christianity (or whatever faith it espouses), it's considered "service" in the context you're asking about. A church service, a Christmas concert, a guest speaker (Christian message), a graduation (Christian school) - it's all the same. None of it would require a permit, and I bet there are thousands of churches and such events with zero permits that prove this position.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:43 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
You have to have permits for events universally
I stand corrected.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
At any point in your Saturday insanity did you make any actual distinction between a concert and a worship service?
Are you even aware of what a worship service is?
Are you even aware of what a worship service is?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:46 pm to pankReb
quote:
At any point in your Saturday insanity did you make any actual distinction between a concert and a worship service?
He did not.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
What if he uses concert and worship service interchangeably?
He clearly doesn't understand the contemporary Christian music scene.
Have had major Christian aritsts come through. Its a mix of concert, worship and charity.
Folks spend their time during intermissions signing up for various charaties and non profits instead of heading to the next window to double fist some alcohol.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
He did not.
It’s absolutely clear that he thinks the worship service is the same thing as the sermon.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:48 pm to the808bass
quote:
He’s really a lawyer. He just has the biggest ego
My take on SFP - yes, a lawyer and yes an ego, but there are a lot of professionals around here with egos (I'm probably one of them and so are you). What sets SFP apart is how much what he posts in these threads means to him. He derives something from participating in these threads that none of the rest of us could fathom.
Page 36 of 43
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News