- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In Montreal, you can’t have a Christian singer have a worship service in a Church
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:01 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:01 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
it was a free event.
0
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Except the references to multiple permits you will have to apply for
Yes. If you’re having events outdoors or depending upon the number of people attending.
Super specific and applicable.
Embarrassing, counselor. Get it together.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He had already applied for permits elsewhere. If he "sincerely didn't see it as a concert", it would make no sense for that prior behavior to have occurred.
He was denied.
He chose to go to church.
You hate Christians, so evidently he is “sincerely insincere,” or whatever other illogical terminology you choose to deflect with.
This is evidenced by the following:
quote:
Many people who sincerely believe they're Christians lie all the time.
quote:
like any contemporary Sunday service.
quote:
Was this on a Sunday?
It does have to be.
He implied that the service was like a Sunday service.
It doesn’t have to be exact.
Similar is what is implied.
Again, you are supporting Canadian authoritarianism.
You do you.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yes. If you’re having events outdoors
Read again
quote:
If holding an event outside, add on a few more permits
"Add a few more" means that there already were permits
quote:
Embarrassing, counselor. Get it together.
As opposed to "they're lying", as your position.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:05 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
You hate Christians, so evidently he is “sincerely insincere,” or whatever other illogical terminology you choose to deflect with.
Holy fricking shite
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:06 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
Are you saying that, in Montreal, they can't have a Christian singer have worship service in a church?
I say they can, but it depends on the person.
If it depends on the person then they have no rights.
It's not a right if you are only allowed to do something the government likes.
quote:
Not if it's going to result in general civil unrest. The government has an obligation to keep the peace.
Um... so you are saying if Republicans create civil unrest for every drag event then the federal government should ban any place that invites Ru Paul from having an event?
Thats backwards, a free society allows people to do what they want to within their rights, and keeps violent protesters away from them.
Else the KKK could have shut down the Civil Rights movement.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:08 pm to Narax
quote:
If it depends on the person then they have no rights.
This is not true.
You're mis-stating the law.
quote:
It's not a right if you are only allowed to do something the government likes.
Religions and religious people don't get to break the laws everyone else must obey b/c of their religion.
Like in that Supreme Court (CA) case. If you want a driver's license, then you have to take a photo. If you don't, then you don't get to break the law and get one anyway.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Do you ever read the shite you write, and think to yourself how insane you sound? Or is just everyone else?
They need a permit to have a Christian band play worship music at a church now?
That justifies a dozen cops, smoke bombs and antifa protests outside?
What world are you living in?
They need a permit to have a Christian band play worship music at a church now?
That justifies a dozen cops, smoke bombs and antifa protests outside?
What world are you living in?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Does this make you horny or something... is that why you do it everyday?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:10 pm to GRTiger
quote:
You made an offer and I accepted.
I didn't make you an offer, I asked you a question. You claimed that you need some sort of proof that a Christian singer can actually have a worship service in a church in Montreal by answering in the affirmative. That's enough for me to know that you're being disingenuous.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:11 pm to RUFshreve
quote:
They need a permit to have a Christian band play worship music at a church now?
That's certainly a way to frame it, and what they tried.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
"Add a few more" means that there already were permits
Sure. Do I need a permit to play instruments in my basement with friends? Sounds like I might based on your argument here.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:12 pm to jimmy the leg
Localities typically require permits for events on public property for many reasons, including liability; access for police, fire, etc.; for ensuring proper facilities like bathrooms; for maintaining capacity limits; ensuring other events aren’t planned for the same time; upholding noise and other nuisance ordinances; and other logistical and financial reasons.
These reasons don’t really apply in private venues like churches, which are responsible for controlling access, for liability, and capacity issues. They are already required to uphold local regulations, regardless of how they use their facilities.
There shouldn’t be a need for a permit for a church to host an event on its premises as long as all other regulations are upheld.
These reasons don’t really apply in private venues like churches, which are responsible for controlling access, for liability, and capacity issues. They are already required to uphold local regulations, regardless of how they use their facilities.
There shouldn’t be a need for a permit for a church to host an event on its premises as long as all other regulations are upheld.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Religions and religious people don't get to break the laws everyone else must obey b/c of their religion.
Agreed. Which law did they break?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If the event meets the zoning requirements, yes, which this event clearly did.
My initial reaction is this is one of your worst takes, but since you reference. information that clearly CLEARLY shows this requires zoning - please share. I’m surprised you didn’t include it since it was so clear.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:13 pm to Nevada_Tiger
quote:
I’m surprised you didn’t include it since it was so clear.
We’re all very surprised.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:16 pm to Narax
quote:
Um... so you are saying if Republicans create civil unrest for every drag event then the federal government should ban any place that invites Ru Paul from having an event?
Personally, I wouldn't have a problem with that - especially if general civil unrest could be reasonably anticipated.
If a mosque was going to invite some famous radical ayatolla to speak, and it was anticipated that the topic at hand would incite the attendees to violent action, I would hope the civil authorities would not allow that to happen.
But then, I have an awfully low tolerance of Islam.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:17 pm to the808bass
What was the stated reason from the mayor for cancelling the original venue? The Canadian news sites I’ve seen all require registration on the maw stories.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's clearly not what was going on
Does this mean one would need a permit from the city to have their marriage ceremony in the Church?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 4:21 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
SFP got straight up bodied in this thread by no less than 20 different posters.
What a massacre
What a massacre
Page 21 of 43
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News