- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Trump enacts the same tariffs via proper statutes, that won't violate this USSC ruling
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Obviously. But substitute Congress for Trump in the title.
1
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:51 am to MilwaukeeKosherDills
quote:
Obviously. But substitute Congress for Trump in the title.
No need. The statutes already exist.
Trump just needs to pick the right one this time.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
The problem is what happens with the refunds
That's going to be a mess.
I doubt the affected countries will seek recourse. Otherwise, Trump can simply arrange the tariffs (done in the legal manner) in such a way that will cover any cost of restitution.
Lol... Trump is well suited to deal woth these issues. He's made billions doing this exact thing, business deals.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:53 am to Lsut81
quote:If it comes to that, they should have to demonstrate commensurate business loses. If they simply passed costs on, they shouldn't be entitled to 1¢
Saw some group of 800 small businesses already sent letters to congress and the WH demanding refunds for what they paid in tariffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:When you have bailouts, civil asset forfeiture, monetary easing, and California passing laws to steal crypto currency "abandoned" for 3 years...among the many other avenues being used against the citizenry
So explain the irony around this
Why so obtuse?
eta: Dont forget to include USAID as well.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 11:56 am
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:56 am to NotChexMix
quote:
When you have bailouts, civil asset forfeiture, monetary easing, and California passing laws to steal crypto currency "abandoned" for 3 years...among the many other avenues being used against the citizenry
I already covered that. As messed up as those are, they are all legal.
This was completely illegal.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:congrats on defending legalized theft.
As messed up as those are, they are all legal.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
LINK
Definitely new mascot for the dem socialist party. First thing you’ve ever been right about. Good job little buddy.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 11:59 am
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:58 am to NotChexMix
quote:
congrats on defending legalized theft.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:59 am to NotChexMix
quote:
NotChexMix
You are being ridiculous.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
Saying "as messed up as they are" is an admission that it is indeed theft, but "completely legal" ignores the complete and total corruption of the American legal system of which you pretend to be apart of
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Government seized that money illegally.
From whom is the question?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:01 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Unenforceable
In the very least it becomes a credit for the new tariffs that are about to be imposed.
Consumers and businesses need to address the sellers who passed on those "illegal tariff" costs. My lawyers has already fired off the demand to Amazon.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:08 pm to NC_Tigah
If cost were passed on then they would have to identify any losses in tariffs as opposed to those others which were zeroed out. It could spark a huge wave of lawsuits against companies as well as for companies.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:05 pm to Timeoday
quote:
In the very least it becomes a credit for the new tariffs that are about to be imposed.
That's not a guarantee.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
Congress will tackle this right after they write a budget and take up the Save Act.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The statutes already exist. Trump just needs to pick the right one this time.
Bingo.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:09 pm to the808bass
quote:
Congress will tackle this right after they write a budget and take up the Save Act.
Not necessary. Multiple avenues already exist that don't require Congress to do anything.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
If it comes to that, they should have to demonstrate commensurate business loses. If they simply passed costs on, they shouldn't be entitled to 1¢
OK. But you know who has even less of an entitlement to 1 cent of the collected tariffs - the US government.
When you illegally take property you don’t get to keep it because someone else mitigated their loses.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:24 pm to ned nederlander
Tell the government that. Ever met anyone who had their stuff taken from asset forfeiture wrongly? Takes years if not decades to get it back.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News