Started By
Message

re: If Roy Moore wins, the GOP Senate needs to be on record voting to expel him

Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:36 pm to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:36 pm to
Making decisions of consequence before finding out as much as you can is the idiocracy

You’re advocating this because “guys they’ll make fun of us” but you’re not one of us. You don’t vote republican

Your hero Bill Maher is a notorious poon hound, wonder what you’ll say when he goes down.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 8:48 pm
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79697 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Because there’s substantial evidence.


There's no evidence.

There's a whole bunch of gossip and hearsay.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95744 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:41 pm to
“We have hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence...” Lionel Hutz
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:44 pm to
Someone said trump collided with Russia

Oh, that’s it. Resign

Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79177 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Do y'all really want to set this precedent? All it would take to unseat a senator is an accusation? Surely you can imagine how that kind of thing would be disastrous.


They wouldn’t have stepped aside if they weren’t guilty. Would you quit your job if someone accused you of something you didn’t do? No you wouldn’t.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:46 pm to
That kind of precedent is destroying democrats and republicans want to invite that on themselves

And really soon the panic will be over

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108534 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

You’re hero Bill Maher is a notorious poon hound, wonder what you’ll say when he goes down.


The poon hounds I don’t think are going down. Like I’ve heard some weird stories about Quentin Tarantino, but they’re just weird and not sexual assault or rape. The ones that play it close to the surface I don’t really suspect since they are loud and proud with nothing to hide. It’s the quiet ones that don’t want to call attention or may make some extremely subtle pun about it. Everyone knows that Maher has been hate fricking Ann Coulter for a good 20 years.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

If Roy Moore wins, the GOP Senate needs to be on record voting to expel him


Good luck.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 8:53 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123942 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

They wouldn’t have stepped aside if they weren’t guilty.
Not necessarily true at all.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81810 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 9:02 pm to
You cannot deny a fair and democratic election.

Talk about overreach - you can't have 48 Dem senators and 3 GOPe cucks (or 20 if you need 2/3) defy the majority of Alabama voters. You will have public sentiment boomerang right back to MAGA

A fair and democratic election is more powerful than any "evidence" that has been brought forward.

If Moore is as abhorrent as you all say then you should be able to defeat him at the ballot box. If you can't than BTFO.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 9:04 pm
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16164 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 10:25 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 6:11 pm
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79177 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Not necessarily true at all.


By what metric?

If I were innocent of something and could prove....better yet DISPROVE "her" allegations, I sure as hell wouldn't upset my whole life by stepping down. I don't get that logic. At all.
Posted by parrothead
big salty ham
Member since Mar 2010
4447 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Did Moore do something wrong? That’s been proven?


I’ll take it you haven’t kept up with his buffoonery over the last 15 years or so. These recent allegations have nothing to do with why he’s a shite stain and I won’t be voting for him.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 10:30 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123942 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

By what metric?
You are running a preschool. You and another family member are accused of horrible actions targeting kids under your care. The allegations including satanic rituals and sexual abuse, are 100% false. However, under suggestive questioning, 360 children claim to have been abused. Prosecutors give you a choice. Either shutter your business, or undergo criminal prosecution which will bankrupt you and your family. What would you do?
quote:

If I were innocent of something and could prove....better yet DISPROVE "her" allegations
That is an entirely different proposition. How does Franken disprove an unwitnessed he-said-she-said attempted kiss from over a decade ago? How does Moore disprove he-said-she-said allegations from 40yrs ago?

Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

and all the girls were willing participants


So you're saying it's perfectly fine for a 32 year old man to molest a 14 year old girl because she was "a willing participant"?

This "40 year silence" excuse is just a way to justify not believing the women.

I wonder is you said the same thing when middle aged men came forward detailing their sexual abuse from catholic priests when they were children?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

So you're saying it's perfectly fine for a 32 year old man to molest a 14 year old girl because she was "a willing participant"?


Allegations aren't facts Toddy.

If they are, then youre a pedophile for molesting a 4 yr old.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 12:13 am to
quote:

This "40 year silence" excuse is just a way to justify not believing the women


There are 2 accusers, based on what we know now one is likely lying. The other has no corroboration or evidence.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260630 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 12:27 am to
quote:

This "40 year silence" excuse is just a way to justify not believing the women.


Disagree and think Moore is awful, but these charges a a bit suspicious.

Don't bring up stuff from 50 years ago and expect sympathy. Or trust your own memory.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53472 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 12:27 am to
The difference here is that we have photos of Franken and has admitted it.

Vs

A guy who denies it and has offered proof of that. 2 women of real concern has had their stories shot to hell. One was living with her father in a different town. How did they talk when the girl says they did so at her moms. She didnt libe there. She lied abiit a phibe in her room. Mom confirmed that.

Then there is the year book.... geez.


Look, there is a list of GOP guilty parties that have been forced ti face the music because of proof. Its not that we have a case of defend due to party. It is a matter of law. Are we too the point that it only takes an accusation? If so this nation is dead.



Conyners deserved due process.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23721 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:12 am to
Good luck with that.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram