- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Drag Queens intentions are pure, why don't they simply wear their everyday clothes
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:55 pm to the808bass
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:55 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yeah. The red flags are all there.
He let something slip in one of his usual self-aggrandising responses to his BS: He mentioned an over-bearing Mother that "beat" certain conditioned behavior into him as a child.
Would probably guess at some point he was forced to wear girls' clothes and wet the bed a lot .
0
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:57 pm to moneyg
quote:
Hank. Your semantics games don’t save you from your disgusting point of view on sexual exploitation of children.
If you will recall, he once bragged about his lack of empathy (as lamented by family and friends) being a "feature" not a "bug".
Most people wouldn't brag about those closest to them remarking on such a clinical trait.
The more he posts and edits, the more he reveals.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:01 pm to moneyg
quote:
I probably didn’t get that usernam exactly right.
Totally understandable, Henry has TONS of alters.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:05 pm to moneyg
quote:According to established definitions, NO. A dog is not a cat, though both are mammals.
a person attempting to normalize sexual contact with children who is not actively trying to accomplish sexual contact is not grooming the child?
You are describing the broader notion of "desensitization."
And (of course) you are also attempting to imply that reading Choo Choo books to kids is "attempting to normalize sexual contact with children," with absolutely no evidence beyond your own delusions.
quote:You are such a dishonest POS.
Hank. Your semantics games don’t save you from your disgusting point of view on sexual exploitation of children
At no point have I ever advocated anything that any SANE person would consider "sexual exploitation of children." I have simply said that sitting in a LIBRARY and reading innocuous stories while wearing outrageous costumes is NOT "sexual exploitation of children."
Does it qualify as "desensitization?" A decent argument could be made that it IS desensitizing kids to variations from gender norms. And you can certainly argue that such desensitization is not a good thing.
But you do make that good faith argument. Instead, you insist upon intentionally misusing words and hurling baseless accusations. But you be you.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:06 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Once again ... Since 2017, the number of adults who identify as transgender has remained steady. The number of teens ages 13 to 17 nearly doubled! You think that doubled rate is happenstance?
And (of course) you are also attempting to imply that reading Choo Choo books to kids is "attempting to normalize sexual contact with children," with absolutely no evidence beyond your own delusions.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:10 pm to oogabooga68
Just like strippers these clowns do this crap to get a response. Strippers make old nasty men horny to spend more money. This asshats do it to create sexual thoughts in children. The real enemy’s are these nasty motherfrickers.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:11 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:I think that correlation is not causation and that the psychological literature confirms that drag and transgender and not closely-related to one another, at all.
Since 2017, the number of adults who identify as transgender has remained steady. The number of teens ages 13 to 17 nearly doubled! You think that doubled rate is happenstance?
But I thought that this thread as about drag performers wanting to diddle kids. Is it NOW about drag performers (who are generally not transgender) wanting to turn cisgender kids into transgender kids.
The moving goalposts are dizzying.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:12 pm to AggieHank86
You’ve argued all day about people being wrong about drag normalization attempts in public libraries and schools.
Why?
Why is this an important issue to you?
Don’t say it’s not. Your posting is the truth.
Why?
Why is this an important issue to you?
Don’t say it’s not. Your posting is the truth.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:13 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You think that doubled rate is happenstance?
The Groomers and Commies have tried to explain that away as "now they feel more comfortable identifying as trains".
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:16 pm to roadGator
I do not defend things I do not agree with. Do you?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:22 pm to Jjdoc
I do not.
There may be a drag queen in his life.
There may be a drag queen in his life.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
And (of course) you are also attempting to imply that reading Choo Choo books to kids is "attempting to normalize sexual contact with children,"
No, I’m implying that doing anything with children dressed in drag is an attempt to promote drag. It has nothing to do with reading a book. It is wildly inappropriate for children. And we know the intent is to promote that lifestyle.
You narrowly define grooming and then, on that basis, conclude that it’s ok. It’s not. It’s sexual in nature. And it’s disgusting. And you’ve aligned yourself with that lifestyle.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Perhaps you should stop spinning?
The moving goalposts are dizzying.
quote:Grooming doesn't entail "diddling". It entails preparation for diddling, and increasing likelihood of acceptance when it occurs.
But I thought that this thread as about drag performers wanting to diddle kids
quote:So doubling the number of transgender teens in just 5 yrs is happenstance?
I think that correlation is not causation
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:23 pm to roadGator
quote:No, I have argued that it is not "sexual grooming" by the drag performers, with ACTUAL "grooming" certainly being a "bad thing." I have also acknowledged that this sort of event probably DOES have a desensitizing effect regarding non-standard gender norms and behaviors (which I don't necessarily see as a "bad thing").
You’ve argued all day about people being wrong about drag normalization attempts in public libraries and schools.
Unlike some, you are quite bright enough to understand the difference.
quote:I would say "interesting" rather than "important."
Why is this an important issue to you?
When something interests me, I can be like a terrier with a bone, and I find it entertaining to debate issues that I find inherently interesting, especially when the issue is much more complex than the "other side" would like to believe. So there is definitely a "just for fun" element to this debate for me.
Also, I am probably an educator at heart. I know that I am not convincing any of the close-minded posters on this thread (several of whom are just trolling anyway, with Ooga leading that camp), but I suppose that I do hope that a reader or two might be learning something useful ... maybe shining a light on a different thought process or making a small crack in the occasional closed mind.
Does that answer your question?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:24 pm to roadGator
quote:Some of these people are just drooling imbeciles. YOU are better than this.
There may be a drag queen in his life.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:26 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
I do not defend things I do not agree with. Do you?
No rational person does.
However the left frequently defend things they won’t admit to agreeing with…and think that truth is defined in the admitting vs. the agreeing.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Excluding children from a strip club is more a matter of "morals" than physical protection, so it is a much closer call. I would probably exercise that coercive authority there, also.
Also you
quote:
Parental rights, Mikey. You respect them, or you do not. It is their call, not yours.
And also you
quote:
A libertarian &/or small-government advocate will almost NEVER seek to impose his moral views upon those who do not share them.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:27 pm to AggieHank86
Boy, Hank is really going to bat for the creepy guys in dresses who are obsessed with exposing themselves to children. What's the deal?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:29 pm to AggieHank86
Well, I didn’t mean it as an insult.
Don’t take everything so negatively.
If you had a drag queen in your life in some capacity spending much of the day in this thread would make more sense.
Agreed?
Don’t take everything so negatively.
If you had a drag queen in your life in some capacity spending much of the day in this thread would make more sense.
Agreed?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Does that answer your question?
Yes.
But much more succinct would have been, “Because I’m Hank”.
Page 7 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News