
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ICE uses Flock camera data to locate illegals for removal
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:34 am to ShrimperDan
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:34 am to ShrimperDan
quote:
What is the specific gripe with FLOCK cameras? What about them specifically does a seemingly overwhelming majority of the board (and society more broadly) find a problem with?
Answer:
And...
Youtube Link
This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 9:38 am
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:34 am to Trevaylin
Get rid of all Flock cameras and other cameras put up by municipalities. I don’t give a frick about the “implied consent” bullshite.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:54 am to finchmeister08
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
If the answer is the Joos, we should also look deeper. That probably correlates with other variables relevant to the issue.
Crime rates? The Upper West side had zero murders and zero rapes so far this year. LINK Among all precincts, it’s among the safest from violent crime and property damage.
Translation: for a business making capital investments, it makes sense to prioritize return on investment.
This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 9:55 am
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:02 am to Trevaylin
quote:
ICE uses Flock camera data to locate illegals for removal
This is why this story is being pushed and we have gullible people on the right eating it up.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:25 am to Trevaylin
That's a positive but I still don't want flock camera helping big brother watch me
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:31 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
I hate having the left on the side here that hates flock but it is what it is
Why? The Left isn’t wrong 100% of the time.
The more people against these cameras the better.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:38 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Most of the left is already against flock, some of the right is. I don’t think this moves anyone else over against it.
I hate having the left on the side here that hates flock but it is what it is
Think of it like chess. Pawns are very useful, disposable pieces on the board.
A player can use them for all kinds of purposes.
The opposing player, can also use the players pawns against them. If they maneuver the player properly. Or the player accidentally puts them somewhere that blocks an important move.
If you think about it under a perspective like that. The left has maneuvered their own pieces into a place that is beneficial to our side of the playing board.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:00 pm to sta4ever
quote:
I don’t understand why anyone would be against this. We are a nation of law and order. If you’re not breaking the law then you have nothing to worry about.
Not too long ago, it was illegal to walk on the beach alone. It was illegal to open your restaurant. It was illegal to not wear a mask. It was illegal to go to church.
Just do what the state tells you, regardless of how anti-American the law is, and you'll be fine, comrade.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:02 pm to kingbob
You sure do trust the federal government now though…
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:07 pm to Yaboylsu63
It serves anyone in power. That’s a major problem.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:16 pm to Yaboylsu63
quote:
Still don’t want Flock even if it serves good purposes at times.
The cameras are the best thing in a long time for when Grandpa forgets what's going on and jumps in the car and drives until he runs out of gas. Not a big fan of Flock cameras, but they've helped out in a bunch of dementia cases.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:22 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:
It's been used for everything you can imagine so far. By both administrations. Even if the good guys are using it, I don't want it used by anyone. Should be 1 hundo illegal.
quote:
What is the specific gripe with FLOCK cameras? What about them specifically does a seemingly overwhelming majority of the board (and society more broadly) find a problem with?
Not trying to be a smartass, but have you read 1984? This is how something like "Big Brother" would get a foothold.
“Always eyes watching you and the voice enveloping you. Asleep or awake, indoors or out of doors, in the bath or bed- no escape. Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimeters in your skull.” ~ George Orwell 1984
quote:
I'm not pro-Flock necessarily, it just seems like people are worried about something that is already happening anyway. Just this week somewhere pretty local to me an attempted rapist was caught within like an hour and I believe it was largely thanks to Flock. If its being used to remove illegals, that's awesome. But like anything what is used for good today can be used for evil tomorrow.
"Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." ~ George Orwell 1984
"Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious." ~ George Orwell 1984
"We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it." ~ George Orwell 1984
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:39 pm to madmaxvol
1984 is a great book and there are absolutely lessons to be learned from it, but I'm more worried about how many people revere works of fiction in an almost biblical manner than I am a FLOCK camera being used by President AOC to hunt me down for driving a car with an internal combustion engine. Every single example you gave was from a work of fiction
I could get imagery from satellites that could see a pack of gum sitting on the dash of your car 2 decades ago. One thing that is going to happen with the cost of sending satellites up is that there will be live feeds via satellite of pretty much everywhere that our government will be the first to have access to sooner than you think. I'm sure they can already do it sporadically ad hoc, its probably just too expensive to have available all the time right now.
Point being, I do share a lot of the same concerns you do but the goose has already been cooked in a lot of ways. I would like to see some uniquely troubling case against FLOCK that outweighs the benefits without having to result in fictional scenarios. My position isn't "Flock = Good", its "This stuff is already happening, so maybe the benefits of Flock are worth it".
Now if there were any chance of dismantling the security state at its core I would be 100% opposed regardless, but if Trump didn't do it then it won't ever happen.
quote:
“Always eyes watching you and the voice enveloping you. Asleep or awake, indoors or out of doors, in the bath or bed- no escape. Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimeters in your skull.”
I could get imagery from satellites that could see a pack of gum sitting on the dash of your car 2 decades ago. One thing that is going to happen with the cost of sending satellites up is that there will be live feeds via satellite of pretty much everywhere that our government will be the first to have access to sooner than you think. I'm sure they can already do it sporadically ad hoc, its probably just too expensive to have available all the time right now.
Point being, I do share a lot of the same concerns you do but the goose has already been cooked in a lot of ways. I would like to see some uniquely troubling case against FLOCK that outweighs the benefits without having to result in fictional scenarios. My position isn't "Flock = Good", its "This stuff is already happening, so maybe the benefits of Flock are worth it".
Now if there were any chance of dismantling the security state at its core I would be 100% opposed regardless, but if Trump didn't do it then it won't ever happen.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:58 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:
1984 is a great book and there are absolutely lessons to be learned from it, but I'm more worried about how many people revere works of fiction in an almost biblical manner than I am a FLOCK camera being used by President AOC to hunt me down for driving a car with an internal combustion engine. Every single example you gave was from a work of fiction
Ok...here's some non-fiction. A guy who was complaining about the local police department at town council meetings getting his license plate searched by the same police officer 63 times, not because he was suspected of committing a crime...but because he was annoyed by him speaking up against them.
Man discovers how many times cops scanned his license plate
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:44 pm to sta4ever
quote:
You sure do trust the federal government now though…
I sure the f$&k do not! You must have me confused with someone else.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 2:31 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
A guy who was complaining about the local police department at town council meetings getting his license plate searched by the same police officer 63 times, not because he was suspected of committing a crime...but because he was annoyed by him speaking up against them.
Do you have any examples of it being used in a systemic way? Not just one idiot cop abusing it?
Posted on 8/12/26 at 2:54 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:
Do you have any examples of it being used in a systemic way? Not just one idiot cop abusing it?
According to this, there are currently over 70 recorded cases across the country where officers have been put on leave, fired, arrested and some convicted for misuse of Flock camera (including stalking and harassment).
Posted on 8/12/26 at 3:47 pm to ShrimperDan
It's the constitutionality of surveilling everything all the time. We have the 4th amendment that protects us from unreasonable search and seizure. Collecting the public data and combining it with private data becomes unreasonable by my (and many others) interpretation of the 4th amendment. Especially when you pay attention to the fact that no warrant is required to use these services. Add in the egregious error rate where people are being accused of crimes they didn't commit and are forced to defend themselves because some AI somewhere couldn't tell the difference between a 0 and a O.

Popular
Back to top

0











