- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I wonder if the upside down cross gave her away?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 7:03 am to RobertFootball
Posted on 10/6/25 at 7:03 am to RobertFootball
quote:
How did these leftists take over churches?
its episcopal churches. they didnt take over, they created their own.
0
Posted on 10/6/25 at 7:03 am to RobertFootball
The Petrine Cross is a symbol of Saint Peter and symbolizes humility and martyrdom.
It is recognized by the many Churches and Christian religions.Saint Peter demanded to be crucified upside down because he thought he was not as worthy as Christ.
It is recognized by the many Churches and Christian religions.Saint Peter demanded to be crucified upside down because he thought he was not as worthy as Christ.
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 7:06 am
Posted on 10/6/25 at 7:06 am to RobertFootball
She's giving trigger warnings for the Bible. 
Posted on 10/6/25 at 7:08 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Saint Peter demanded to be crucified upside down because he thought he was not as worthy as Chris
That’s a tradition
Posted on 10/6/25 at 7:31 am to OWLFAN86
quote:
Women cannot teach the word of God,, doesnt matter whats shes wearing
Let’s check if that holds waters.
quote:
Greet Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen and my fellow prisoners. They are highly regarded among the apostles, and they were in Christ before me.
So Paul here in Romans 16:7 establishes that a woman, named Junia, was noteworthy among the apostles, meaning she herself was an apostle who was very accomplished. Seeing as how the purpose of an apostle was to teach and spread the word of God, I’d say the evidence is clear that at least during Paul’s time, women were teaching the word of God.
This is further evidenced by the fact that in some later manuscripts some scribes were changing “Junia” to “Junius” (a male sounding name) but there are no records to indicate that “Junius” was ever an actual name. So hundreds of years later, some a-hole scribe is thinking how women shouldn’t hold any authority so he tried to overwrite Paul’s own words.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 7:43 am to AlwysATgr
quote:quote:1 Tim. 2:11-13
11 A woman must learn in quietness, in all submission. 12 But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. 13 For it was Adam who was first formed, and then Eve. 14 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into trespass.
Phoebe - Deacon and Patron, Romans 16:1-2
Junia - highly regarded Apostle, Romans 16:7
Priscilla - co-worker in Christ, helped Apollos, Romans 16:3, Acts 18, 1 Corinthians 16:19
Mary - worker in Christ, Romans 16:6
Tryphena, Tryphosa, and Persis - women who work hard in the Lord, Romans 16:12
Euodia and Syntyche - labored side by side with Paul in spreading the gospel, Philippians 4:2-3
Certainly these women must’ve opened their mouths, said something, and taught something, no?
I bet you don’t even realize 1 Timothy was a forgery - it was not written by the same person who wrote Romans. This is the scholarly consensus. Look it up.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:20 am to dickkellog
quote:
the good news here is that the protestant reformation is on it's last legs! this was always it's logical conclusion soon it will be a distant memory!
That woman is a clear apostate who has nothing to do with the true visible ancient church or even the vast majority of Protestant churches of any sort, for that matter.
This man is universally recognized as the uncontested head of the Roman Catholic Church.
Downvoters: please refute the above. TIA.
And if I HAD to guess, you know very little about true Church history of any sort.
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:23 am to tide06
quote:
My church is packed, expanding and voted 98%-2% to leave the leftists behind.
What does that mean exactly?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:25 am to RobertFootball
Anyone who is fooled by this nonsense is truly lost. I always chuckle at the “nondenominational light of truth “ type churches that seem to be more and more popular. However as the host said they push the “don’t be scared “ narrative of the Bible and then attempt to deconstruct the actual meaning to fit their twisted ideology.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:27 am to dickkellog
quote:
the good news here is that the protestant reformation is on it's last legs! this was always it's logical conclusion soon it will be a distant memory!
You don't know that for sure, you're just writing that to cause a fight. That's what Satan would do.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:36 am to RobertFootball
This is "thieves in the temple" all over again, except this time the devil is there himself.
Time for Jesus to come back and clean house....
Time for Jesus to come back and clean house....
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:41 am to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
Hey bro <>
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:48 am to canyon
I honestly always thought it would be much harder to spot the false prophets but it’s very easy. I can’t imagine how easy it’ll be to spot the antichrist.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 8:50 am to idlewatcher
Every Methodist church had to decide whether to stay with the progressive wing or break off to maintain traditional conservative views related to how things would be handled moving forward.
While each congregation got to choose how that would be decided mine voted and the vote was 98%-2% to leave (conservative doctrine).
Many more churches would’ve left but couldn’t afford to.
Point being the poster was blasting the Protestants while they were doing exactly what the Roman Catholic Church should’ve done long ago: clear out the pedos, crooks and infiltrators.
While each congregation got to choose how that would be decided mine voted and the vote was 98%-2% to leave (conservative doctrine).
Many more churches would’ve left but couldn’t afford to.
Point being the poster was blasting the Protestants while they were doing exactly what the Roman Catholic Church should’ve done long ago: clear out the pedos, crooks and infiltrators.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:25 am to RobertFootball
quote:
I can’t imagine how easy it’ll be to spot the antichrist.
Why are you writing as if this is a future event? Have you read 1 John and 2 John, the only epistles of the New Testament where the word “antichrist” is used? The writer of those two epistles “John” says that the antichrists (plural) are Christians who do not believe Jesus came to earth in the flesh. Some early Christians, like Paul, didn’t believe Jesus was ever on earth, and thought the later gospels were “cleverly devised myths” (2 Peter 1:16). Some other early Christians like the sect of Valentinus - some might call Gnostic or Docetic - believed Jesus came to earth but didn’t have a flesh and blood body (in outward appearance only). Still other Christians didn’t believe Jesus came to earth at all - that he was a regular Jew born on earth to Jewish mom and dad who through his righteousness became the son of God when he was baptized by John the Dipper. “John” may even be referring to Jews who do not believe Jesus is the anointed one (the Christos aka the Messiah).
At any rate, John is clear that may antichrists have come and that there are many antichrists already existing in the world at the time he wrote his epistles. The “coming of the antichrist” is not some future event.
FYI - the “antichrist” is not mentioned in Revelation. A lot of people that never read Revelation think that it is mentioned in there.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:08 pm to Squirrelmeister
Did you mean to say that Paul didn’t think Jesus was ever on earth? You know that’s incorrect, right?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:15 pm to RobertFootball
That's absolutely horrific, and a great example of what happens when you abandon the authority of the Scriptures as the sole infallible rule for the faith.
The contempt for God's word is evident in that woman's speech. It's sickening.
God will judge these "shepherds" who lead sheep astray.
The contempt for God's word is evident in that woman's speech. It's sickening.
God will judge these "shepherds" who lead sheep astray.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:17 pm to W2NOMO
quote:
How did these leftists take over churches?
on purpose
This....
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:21 pm to RobertFootball
United Methodist?
Lesbian with a mullet... My guess is yes.
Lesbian with a mullet... My guess is yes.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:24 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Women cannot teach the word of God,, doesnt matter whats shes wearing
While I personally would not want a women preacher, I'll ask you a couple of questions:
- Why can women not "teach the word of God"?
- Is it wrong for women to cut their hair?
- Were Martha and her sister Mary teachers, disciples, etc. and did we learn anything from their lives in the Bible?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News