Started By
Message

re: I was an FBI agent. Trump’s lack of concern about Russian hacking shocks me.

Posted on 6/11/17 at 9:56 am to
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59283 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 9:56 am to
Meanwhile Comey admitted Lynch tried to obstruct justice. Apparently concern for the law only extends to Republicans they thought may have broken it
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26727 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 9:58 am to
Let's look at what we KNOW are the facts. Hillary Clinton tried to interfere in Russia's elections.

Barack Obama actively worked to defeat Bibi Netanyahu in Israel, going so far as to send campaign operatives there to help in the effort.

He also went to the UK and actively spoke against Brexit.

Donna Brazile and the DNC worked behind the scenes to help Hillary win the Democrat nomination and directly worked against Bernie the Commie. Rigging elections.

Debbie Wasserman Sgtschultz lost her job at the DNC for the same reasons, trying to rig an election.

We also know that questions were given to Hillary's people in advance by Brazile to rig her debate with Donald Trump. Media and DNC collusion. Election rigging.

All facts. Now WHO was it again interfering in elections?
This post was edited on 6/11/17 at 10:01 am
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
66691 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 9:59 am to
quote:

It’s worth noting that there is unanimity among senior intelligence officials that the Russian interference in our election not only happened, but that it was extraordinary and unprecedented
Three questions:

1. Who are these unnamed "senior intelligence officials?" How many of them are there?

2 How does she know what all of them think? She spoke to everyone one of them?

3. They are all unanimously of the belief that this was "unprecedented?"

Frankly, the article reads like a hit piece by a Leftist who hates Trump.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 10:01 am to
If there is no evidence, why would he be concerned?
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26727 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 10:02 am to
Unnamed sources should be treated as liars unless they are willing to come forward and be identified. What are they worried about if they are telling the truth?

I think a kill shot concerning all this "election interference" talk is ask them to define what they mean when they say that.


What it REALLY means is outed all the Democrat behind the scenes dirty tricks. There was NO tampering with the actual vote.
This post was edited on 6/11/17 at 10:06 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139004 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Comey must have been playing 12D chess to be able to see that far into the future.
Comey was looking to undercut Trump from this time last year onward.

Comey chose the wrong team. He should never have been in the game of choosing one team over the other at all. Yet, Comey stubbornly held to that decision. In contrast to seeing "that far into the future," the man lost his job because he had no ability to anticipate and/or see the future at all.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19622 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 10:10 am to
quote:


I'm not saying it didn't happen. But not one single US agency nor US senior intelligence official was allowed to inspect the DNC servers. This "nearly unaninmous" opinion is based off of Crowdstrike's report.


I am sure the CIA has spies on the ground who corroborated it. NSA also probably picked Putin up on intercepts talking about it. I wouldn't be surprised if some of Putin's closest aides are CIA informants, and I wouldn't be surprised if NSA has hacked into some of Russia's classified networks. The IC has other sources besides Crowdstrike, trust me.

To believe the Russians didn't hack would be to believe in a huge bi-partisan conspiracy to promote fake intelligence. While I definitely would NOT put such a scheme past Obama and his minions, I just don't think ALL the Republicans would go along with it. Some Republican somewhere would have already said "wait a minute, this doesn't add up." Every Republican (including Gowdy and Nunes) who has seen the intel believe Russia hacked the DNC.

All that said, my contention is "so what?" The hacking of the DNC had nothing to do with the outcome of the election.
This post was edited on 6/11/17 at 10:11 am
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39710 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Comey was looking to undercut Trump from this time last year onward. Comey chose the wrong team. He should never have been in the game of choosing one team over the other at all. Yet, Comey stubbornly held to that decision. In contrast to seeing "that far into the future," the man lost his job because he had no ability to anticipate and/or see the future at all.


In the most generous of scenarios toward Comey, NC...he tried to remain neutral - in effect - re the Election...when that ran CONTRARY to both His Oath and the Rule of Law. After DOCUMENTING Hillary's CRIMES...he added that there was "no intent", and that as such...no crime.

Not so with Trump. Comey 'speculated' that Trump was indeed trying to obstruct justice by manipulation His (Comey's) Investigation. Gave Lynch a pass on and even more obvious attempt at manipulating an Investigation toward Political ends.

Bottom line. Comey is DONE. His hallowed "Book" will be a flop...just like Hillary's. But for the Lib Orgs that will buy in to make it look legit. All about 'looks'. Devil at the core; lies from the 'Father of the Lie'. Democracy my arse!
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117591 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 11:02 am to
Wapo = Dell Comics
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127399 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 11:56 am to
It is in reference to what we were discussing - future changes to our election process.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89076 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Comey was looking to undercut Trump from this time last year onward.

Comey chose the wrong team. He should never have been in the game of choosing one team over the other at all. Yet, Comey stubbornly held to that decision. In contrast to seeing "that far into the future," the man lost his job because he had no ability to anticipate and/or see the future at all.


The Clintons were using Comey to control the Marc Rich pardon investigation. He's been in the bag for them for at least 15 years.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
10217 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

a want 


Dam son go see a shrink...
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

All that said, my contention is "so what?"




Tell me you're not serious. It's ok with you if foreign powers can maliciously hack the DNC? How idiotic.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 12:16 pm to
The melt continues
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55328 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 12:24 pm to
This is a total bullshite piece of propaganda.

The IC has the Counter Intelligence mission, not Trump.

Now, in my view, the IC is so thoroughly politicized that it can't really do its originally intended mission BUT it's very good at undermining Trump with leaks and this new politicized IC will be instrumental in keeping the Globalists in power, so it will be serving its newly-intended purpose.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127399 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

I get it now.

Your mission in life is to singlehandedly bring Trump down yourself by starting 30 threads a day on this board. Brilliant.
It would have worked to if it had not been for your meddling
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127399 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

It's ok with you if foreign powers can maliciously hack the DNC?
Comey made it clear it was not just the DNC. And during the Obama administration we had similar operations against foreign powers. So stop with the pompous faux hand wringing. The DNC chose (through a rigged process) a lousy candidate who was thoroughly trounced by a reality star that did not even have the full backing of his party. What was revealed was their own words. They have no one to blame but themselves. The whole system stinks. Burn it to the ground.
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
22971 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Trump’s lack of concern about Russian hacking shocks me.



What shocks me daily is the FBI's complicitness in the abuse of power displayed by the Obama administration by using the IRS, FBI, and the NSA to spy on political opponents for eight years...

You need to step back from the scene and look at the big picture. The Trump Administration might be more concerned with the Russian influence in American political arena if they were defending themselves from constant attack from the US Govt itself as a result of much of the Obama Admin spying and leaking efforts.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

All facts. Now WHO was it again interfering in elections?


I'm not arguing any of that is fact

I'm not defending the democrats

I'm simply saying it wasn't a targeted attack against the DNC to help Trump. The media is spinning that to try to push the Trump/Russia bullshite.

The US government (Dem/Reb) has been interfering in world politics for half a century
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 6/11/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Comey made it clear it was not just the DNC. And during the Obama administration we had similar operations against foreign powers. So stop with the pompous faux hand wringing. The DNC chose (through a rigged process) a lousy candidate who was thoroughly trounced by a reality star that did not even have the full backing of his party. What was revealed was their own words. They have no one to blame but themselves. The whole system stinks. Burn it to the ground.


I think we found some common ground
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram