- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/13/24 at 9:03 am to GhostOfFreedom
Additional condo in Florida I would guess
Posted on 2/13/24 at 9:09 am to GhostOfFreedom
Kennedy talks a good talk (he loves his sound clips), but when it comes to walking the walk, he falls in line with the swamp every time.
Louisiana’s senators have got to be the most disgusting 1, 2 punch of any red state.
Louisiana’s senators have got to be the most disgusting 1, 2 punch of any red state.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 9:12 am to GhostOfFreedom
Not sure why people are surprised. Anyone who looks at voting records instead of listening to sound bites knows that Kennedy always vote for the establishment.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 9:17 am to SPT
I am tired of his “holier than thou” “cutesy wootsy” BS.
Actions (and votes) speak much louder than smart arse sound bytes. It’s all a smoke screen.
Actions (and votes) speak much louder than smart arse sound bytes. It’s all a smoke screen.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 9:26 am to GhostOfFreedom
I sent an email to him this morning and told him that he was not any better than Cassidy. He has finally transformed himself into a uniparty member and I’ll vote for a dumbacrat over him if he runs again. I won’t (can’t) ever vote for a democrat again but he doesn’t know that.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 9:35 am to GhostOfFreedom
Only out is he knows it’ll die in the House.
Best I got.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 10:06 am to GhostOfFreedom
Broh. This was the most important vote of his lifetime, and he rose to meet the moment.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 10:22 am to GhostOfFreedom
Did you think that Kennedy was some close the borders, don't get involved in foreign affairs guy?
What in the world would have given you that impression?
What in the world would have given you that impression?
Posted on 2/13/24 at 10:23 am to TBoy
quote:
How dare they oppose Putin’s plan to change the borders in Europe.
We are experiencing an invasion at our own southern border and doing nothing about it. Why should we give a crap about a border thousands of miles away?
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:00 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
All these SOBs and the Democrats are treasonous, crooked, selfish children who would bankrupt an ice cream stand on popular Florida beach with no competition.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:22 am to GhostOfFreedom
They passed a Senate Amendment SA 1388 to a House Veterans bill called the RELIEVE Act. HB 815
This Wall of Text explains the process:
Consideration of Senate Amendments by the House
When the Senate passes a House bill with one or more amendments, it is messaged back to the
House, where it is normally held at the Speaker’s table. The bill may be referred to a committee at
the Speaker’s discretion, but this would be likely only if the Senate has included substantial
nongermane matters in its amendment that would fall in the jurisdiction of a committee different
from the one that considered the original matter in the bill.
One limitation on the use of amendments between the houses is that, before reaching the stage of
disagreement, Senate amendments generally are not privileged in the House. This means a
Member cannot interrupt the regular order of business to move that the House consider a measure
with a Senate amendment if the subject of the amendment would normally need to be considered
in Committee of the Whole (generally matters related to appropriations, or authorizations,
appropriations, or revenues). The only motion that can be made on the House floor at this stage is
a motion to go to conference with the Senate if made at the direction of the committee(s) with
jurisdiction over the subject of the measure.
The House, however, may choose to consider Senate amendments by one of several methods that
overcome this limitation. The House floor manager may ask unanimous consent to concur in the
Senate amendments or concur with an amendment. Either case would normally only occur when
the provisions in question are noncontroversial since objection by any Member would cause the
request to fail. (This procedure does not allow for any debate, although another Member will
often reserve the right to object, allowing the floor manager to clarify the purpose and content of
the request.) As an alternative, or if an objection is made to a unanimous consent request, the
House may also consider Senate amendments either by a motion to suspend the rules (when such
a motion is in order) or under the terms of a special rule.
My thought is, it's all BS and nothing will become of it.
Still Kennedy should have voted Nay.
This Wall of Text explains the process:
Consideration of Senate Amendments by the House
When the Senate passes a House bill with one or more amendments, it is messaged back to the
House, where it is normally held at the Speaker’s table. The bill may be referred to a committee at
the Speaker’s discretion, but this would be likely only if the Senate has included substantial
nongermane matters in its amendment that would fall in the jurisdiction of a committee different
from the one that considered the original matter in the bill.
One limitation on the use of amendments between the houses is that, before reaching the stage of
disagreement, Senate amendments generally are not privileged in the House. This means a
Member cannot interrupt the regular order of business to move that the House consider a measure
with a Senate amendment if the subject of the amendment would normally need to be considered
in Committee of the Whole (generally matters related to appropriations, or authorizations,
appropriations, or revenues). The only motion that can be made on the House floor at this stage is
a motion to go to conference with the Senate if made at the direction of the committee(s) with
jurisdiction over the subject of the measure.
The House, however, may choose to consider Senate amendments by one of several methods that
overcome this limitation. The House floor manager may ask unanimous consent to concur in the
Senate amendments or concur with an amendment. Either case would normally only occur when
the provisions in question are noncontroversial since objection by any Member would cause the
request to fail. (This procedure does not allow for any debate, although another Member will
often reserve the right to object, allowing the floor manager to clarify the purpose and content of
the request.) As an alternative, or if an objection is made to a unanimous consent request, the
House may also consider Senate amendments either by a motion to suspend the rules (when such
a motion is in order) or under the terms of a special rule.
My thought is, it's all BS and nothing will become of it.
Still Kennedy should have voted Nay.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:39 am to GhostOfFreedom
The Senate as a whole is completely disengaged from the people.
Need to vote him out at all costs.
Need to vote him out at all costs.
This post was edited on 2/13/24 at 11:39 am
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:53 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
WTH would he [Kennedy] vote to piss away more money like this?
Fiat Money costs nothing but the price of ink & paper.
If we have learned anything since Debacle c.2020, this entire system, its dogmas, its financial / corp institutions are absolute shams (Senators are just obvious sock-puppets.)
The real Decision-Maker string-pullers are who you expect (Markers: see 1913 Feral Reserve Banksters, Act of 1871, Internet Archive.
The US Dollar has long been booby-trapped to collapse the US Fiat Dollar under its own weight. Once Nixon tied the USD to an infinite supply of Oil(Huh??!) and OFF the Gold Standard, it was Game Over. The Dollar Collapse, US Wealth, Middle Class Wealth theft (transferred to the Bankster-Ruling Class) was inevitable.
Kennedy and other sock-puppet Senators' are guilty of following the voting-orders of their Puppetmeisters sponsors. BIG PICTURE: You see, our "Bank" and Credit MUST be broken -- THEN BBB! You-Kraine and "Foreign Aid merely provide that cover.
The systematic sabotage of USA, INC, Scorched Earth / DePop agenda, and Luciferian-BBB continue on scheduled, unabated.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:01 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Notice how Graham voted NO but he's one of the main cheerleaders for all this. This is just part of the game they play so they can later say, "I voted no on this".
Savvy observation.
Lady Lindsey's puppetmeister must have sensed that the Senate's #1 War Monger(R) needed a Mulligan on his Senate scorecard. His single vote was not needed as you noted, giving him plausible deniability.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:10 pm to Sput
quote:
Froghorn doesn’t give a frick about you or this country.
NONE of the US Senate do.
This is all theater. They are props. "Representative gummint" is a sham.
NEWSFLASH: Senators keep on voting to steal wealth from US citizens AND continue their scorched earth of Late Great USA
US citizenry:
Meh.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:14 pm to GhostOfFreedom
It’s time to call for both of their resignations
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:16 pm to GhostOfFreedom
Putin is going to be BIG mad at them!
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:22 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
conservatives
You think Romney, Murkowski, McConnell, Thune, Cornyn, Tillis, etc., are conservatives?
They're about as conservative as you.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News