- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:21 pm to VOR
How exactly do you think real time data is transmitted to media outlets on election day/night??
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:20 pm to davyjones
Until someone shows evidence that an election machine is hacked I am one republican believing it is the most secure method of voting. They are not connected to the internet. Remember that you have to sign your name to a book and that book can be reviewed to verify the number of votes on the machine. You have also shown your id with a picture to verify who you are. This is important.
Paper ballots on the other hand are what democrats like Kamala have wanted for years. The mail out covid ballots are the most insecure way of voting. They arrive at a voters home and can be voted by anyone willing to sign the voters name. Ie a ballot mailed to someone who has moved may be voted by anyone willing to perpetuate fraud and mailed back.
Most people don’t realize that the machines are tested in most places before the actual election and voted to see if there are irregularities. No pre vote test has ever indicated a breach. Remember when Dominion whose reputation was ruined by the bs claims. Won a multi million dollar lawsuit for defamation. I love Trump but his insistence that the machines are hacked are bs. I’ll wait for any evidence otherwise. Paper ballots however are bs and scanners can’t always pick up a x or check. (Yes you are suppose to darken the oval) Paper ballots are not an answer. if you don’t want scanners to count a paper ballot you will be weeks before receiving election ballots in a large city. Not having a vote timely leads to election irregularities.
Paper ballots on the other hand are what democrats like Kamala have wanted for years. The mail out covid ballots are the most insecure way of voting. They arrive at a voters home and can be voted by anyone willing to sign the voters name. Ie a ballot mailed to someone who has moved may be voted by anyone willing to perpetuate fraud and mailed back.
Most people don’t realize that the machines are tested in most places before the actual election and voted to see if there are irregularities. No pre vote test has ever indicated a breach. Remember when Dominion whose reputation was ruined by the bs claims. Won a multi million dollar lawsuit for defamation. I love Trump but his insistence that the machines are hacked are bs. I’ll wait for any evidence otherwise. Paper ballots however are bs and scanners can’t always pick up a x or check. (Yes you are suppose to darken the oval) Paper ballots are not an answer. if you don’t want scanners to count a paper ballot you will be weeks before receiving election ballots in a large city. Not having a vote timely leads to election irregularities.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:08 pm to anc
quote:
Everything Democrats are against they were for a few years ago.
quote:
I agree with Kamala Harris
With an intellect like this, she could be a sure-fire front-runner as a Presidential candidate, garnering support from celebrities such as Beyonce, Springsteen and Oprah. May even raise a record setting $2 Billion for a presidential run.
I hope they run her.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:14 pm to ulmtiger
I don’t think hacking election machines influenced the outcome of that election, not at all. Could it have possibly contributed to it when combined with other significant flaws both there and elsewhere around the country (ie manipulation and abuse of local/state election laws? Sure, that’s not an unreasonable notion. So you and I are probably more on the same page about this particular topic than we may have initially known.
Now, as to my comment about connecting to the internet, all that was was a broad, general observation, based primarily on the premise that I’ve “overheard” that, basically, they have to intermittently connect to the internet to transmit current data to either or both media outlets (that might even be prescribed in election regulations, providing current info openly and conveniently to news sources, as well as I assume a need to share data immediately and in real time with state election agency “headquarters.” Those suggested explanations make easy sense to me.
Now, as to my comment about connecting to the internet, all that was was a broad, general observation, based primarily on the premise that I’ve “overheard” that, basically, they have to intermittently connect to the internet to transmit current data to either or both media outlets (that might even be prescribed in election regulations, providing current info openly and conveniently to news sources, as well as I assume a need to share data immediately and in real time with state election agency “headquarters.” Those suggested explanations make easy sense to me.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 3:19 pm to VOR
WRONG
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:30 pm to anc
quote:.
Everything Democrats are against they were for a few years ago.
Like this board with war?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:39 pm to anc
No one actually believes our elections are secure except maybe SFP.
Democrats believe Trump cheated and Republicans believe Biden cheated.
Democrats believe Trump cheated and Republicans believe Biden cheated.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:41 pm to LSUbacchus81
quote:
Like this board with war?
I think some people who weren't against bombing terrorists before are now because Trump.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:43 pm to ulmtiger
quote:
Until someone shows evidence that an election machine is hacked I am one republican believing it is the most secure method of voting. They are not connected to the internet.
The first time I heard the machines could be hacked was before 2020 when Louisiana wanted to replace their machines. Because the old ones are vulnerable.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:18 pm to davyjones
quote:
I don’t think hacking election machines influenced the outcome of that election
I don’t think they hacked the election machines for one simple reason - they didn’t need to. They had an unlimited license to harvest mail-in votes. Why would they risk something else?
However, I don’t like computer voting because it’s bound to get hacked eventually.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:54 pm to anc
We taking bets on how quickly she deletes this one?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:00 pm to CDawson
quote:
The filth votes against it because they know they cannot win a fair, secure election.
Trump pick wins: Fair Election
Trump pick loses: Rigged
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:02 pm to CrystalPreserves
CrystalPreserves : Democrat
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:19 pm to Penrod
I’m far more of the opinion that it was the abuse of temporary revisions or temporary suspensions of state election laws, using covid to justify of course, and whatever other similar avenues and methods manipulated by coincidentally almost always leftist or Democrat officials. It would be a patchwork of “weapons” seized upon and used by said parties. Some instances and acts of which were obviously contemptible and worthy of a running crow hop to the bridge of the nose, however, difficult to successfully prosecute for a litany of potential reasons. Others of which could surely produce some level(s) of conviction.
I typically stay away from overly and sometimes unreasonably eager demands for prosecutorial action that folks not experienced in the area of criminal prosecution usually can’t even come up with the crime or crimes they demand be charged or upon whom (lol), much less the many procedural factors that could derail the entire thing (stat of limitations, etc). So I’m thankfully not of that description, however my thoughts above in the opening paragraph are IMO quite reasonable and restrained ones.
That’s “all” I got.
I typically stay away from overly and sometimes unreasonably eager demands for prosecutorial action that folks not experienced in the area of criminal prosecution usually can’t even come up with the crime or crimes they demand be charged or upon whom (lol), much less the many procedural factors that could derail the entire thing (stat of limitations, etc). So I’m thankfully not of that description, however my thoughts above in the opening paragraph are IMO quite reasonable and restrained ones.
That’s “all” I got.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:26 pm to anc
California loves paper ballots via mail
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:27 pm to DeBoar
quote:
CrystalPreserves : Democrat
That’s an interesting guess. It’s also wrong. More importantly, it still wouldn’t answer the argument.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:32 pm to anc
Most black people and married women don't know how to operate a paper ballot.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 11:09 pm to FireawayLSU
quote:
ballot harvesting
Ballot harvesting is fully legal in California, and both parties have taken full advantage of it. How do you think Trump got over 6,000,000 votes there in 2024?
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 7/19/26 at 11:25 pm to anc
It doesn't matter if the votes are paper or digital. If things don't go the way Trump wants them he will claim that things were rigged.
We have evidence of him making this claim with both scenarios
We have evidence of him making this claim with both scenarios
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News