- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

How worried should we be they're going to block all of Trump's initial appointees?
Posted on 11/24/24 at 1:08 am
Posted on 11/24/24 at 1:08 am
One like hegseth, Kennedy, and Gabbard, what will happen
Posted on 11/24/24 at 1:52 am to Tunasntigers92
You shouldn't be worried. If the government can't play nice when the people have spoken, then the people have an obligation to let them know, peacefully or otherwise.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 1:55 am to Tunasntigers92
Any red state rinos who vote against Trump appointees are risking serious primary challengers so everyone except Hegseth should get through easily.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 1:57 am to Brosef Stalin
What do you think the issue with hegseth will be?
Posted on 11/24/24 at 2:12 am to Tunasntigers92
In order to appoint anyone worthwhile, they have to face the Senate and get approved. The Senate is the source of the deep state. They only approve "our guys".
The trick for Trump is to nominate heads that will be easily approved, with MAGA juniors in those departments. A senate approval is needed for the heads AND their juniors.
Once a person has been approved by the Senate, they can hold any position without additional confirmation.
Then, Trump just has to fire the boss to install MAGA people.
The trick for Trump is to nominate heads that will be easily approved, with MAGA juniors in those departments. A senate approval is needed for the heads AND their juniors.
Once a person has been approved by the Senate, they can hold any position without additional confirmation.
Then, Trump just has to fire the boss to install MAGA people.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 4:55 am to Tunasntigers92
I don’t know about who will wind up getting confirmed or blocked, but I am worried that Trump is gonna have to needlessly spent limited political capital (yes, he has a mandate, but even the most popular 2nd termers are lame ducks basically no later than the mid-terms 2 years later) fixing unforced errors of insufficient vetting, when he’s known he was gonna be the Republican candidate since the minute he announced.
I mean, you’re gonna appoint the hot 44-year-old dude off of Fox’s morning weekend show to be fricking Secretary of Defense, and you had a couple of years and didn’t know that he was a drunken poon hound who knocked up his 3rd wife while cheating on his 2nd? It would be one thing if he’s known it all along, but still thought he was the best man for the job, so just said “frick it,” and appointed him anyway. But apparently some of this shite caught Trump’s team off guard, which is just unacceptable. It’s not the 30s or 60s or most any other time in American history when there were no real records of these things, and the media was willing to sweep them under the rug for the good of the nation. But it’s not even about the morality of it to me. It’s more about the incompetence, quite frankly, of the people he has vetting these picks that, in 2024, didn’t know everything he’s ever fricking done. Especially because of his being such an unorthodox pick for one of the most important gigs in the world, and he’s probably the most recognizable guy ever tapped due to Fox. I don’t know. Again, it’s just hard for me to comprehend they wouldn’t have talked to every person he’s met, found out everywhere he’s ever been, every hand he’s ever shaken, etc…
Oh well, I’m interested to see how it shakes out.
I mean, you’re gonna appoint the hot 44-year-old dude off of Fox’s morning weekend show to be fricking Secretary of Defense, and you had a couple of years and didn’t know that he was a drunken poon hound who knocked up his 3rd wife while cheating on his 2nd? It would be one thing if he’s known it all along, but still thought he was the best man for the job, so just said “frick it,” and appointed him anyway. But apparently some of this shite caught Trump’s team off guard, which is just unacceptable. It’s not the 30s or 60s or most any other time in American history when there were no real records of these things, and the media was willing to sweep them under the rug for the good of the nation. But it’s not even about the morality of it to me. It’s more about the incompetence, quite frankly, of the people he has vetting these picks that, in 2024, didn’t know everything he’s ever fricking done. Especially because of his being such an unorthodox pick for one of the most important gigs in the world, and he’s probably the most recognizable guy ever tapped due to Fox. I don’t know. Again, it’s just hard for me to comprehend they wouldn’t have talked to every person he’s met, found out everywhere he’s ever been, every hand he’s ever shaken, etc…
Oh well, I’m interested to see how it shakes out.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 5:55 am to POTUS2024
quote:
Play dirty
I wish. Doubt it will happen after seeing Bondi inserted into AG pick. She will not go after anyone and it will just be more of the same. It's sickening that the deep state continues to have the reigns in DC.
This post was edited on 11/24/24 at 5:59 am
Posted on 11/24/24 at 6:01 am to HillabeeBaw
quote:
that the deep state continues to have the reigns in DC.
We can only hope that their "rein" is coming to an end.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 6:17 am to Homesick Tiger
Well they are screaming about experience, perhaps Hegseth is not approved and we submit.......Flynn, yeah that is the ticket, nothing like a bunch of rhinos with their hair on fire 
Posted on 11/24/24 at 6:32 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Thats a quality melt
Since when does anyone in Washington give a flying rat’s arse about infidelity, or sexual misconduct of any kind? The guy is a veteran. A lot of vets struggle with relationships and addictions upon return from combat.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 6:33 am to Tunasntigers92
snap their necked and piss down their throats
Posted on 11/24/24 at 6:33 am to Tunasntigers92
You shouldn’t be worried that the current administration won’t let NAZIS be in a NAZIS cabinet. Yall are psycho, incel mf’s
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:22 am to Tunasntigers92
Don't worry. We voted for Trump, now let him do his thing. He has some brilliant folks around him helping.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:27 am to Brosef Stalin
....and if that does not work......which it really has not ....except in Wyoming, then what's the play?
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:30 am to Tunasntigers92
I say Trump just force them to deny as many as it takes. The more the better. Those in the senate that oppose him will start to feel the pressure. There is a mandate whether they believe it or not
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:48 am to Tunasntigers92
Some will have more problems than others. Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer as Labor Secretary will likely have little to no problems, for example.
Hegseth will likely get blocked due the "omg FOX NEWS" rantings and the rhetoric about how his inability to keep his pants on makes him too vulnerable (see: Eric Swallwell & Fang Fang). That latter excuse will be used as (weak) cover by the RINOs too scared to stand against Trump (and their voters) on their own.
With all that, DC often operates on a momentum philosophy. If Trump first puts up those most likely to fail the process, it's going to make it easier for RINOs in the Senate to vote against others. If he pushes them from most-likely to least-likely then that momentum works for him.
Hegseth will likely get blocked due the "omg FOX NEWS" rantings and the rhetoric about how his inability to keep his pants on makes him too vulnerable (see: Eric Swallwell & Fang Fang). That latter excuse will be used as (weak) cover by the RINOs too scared to stand against Trump (and their voters) on their own.
With all that, DC often operates on a momentum philosophy. If Trump first puts up those most likely to fail the process, it's going to make it easier for RINOs in the Senate to vote against others. If he pushes them from most-likely to least-likely then that momentum works for him.
This post was edited on 11/24/24 at 8:50 am
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:57 am to Bard
The problem in the Senate is the Republicans with six years remaining on their terms so they can block and not worry about what six years later will be like
Back to top


14







