- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How close do we think Iran really was to nukes?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:04 am to GeauxBurrow312
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:04 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
America First is not letting other nations have weapons that can end civilization
What a massive contradiction.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What a massive contradiction.
Seems as the current nuclear powers have been pretty reserved in their uses of them, outside threats from N. Korea.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:06 am to RogerTheShrubber
Not a contradiction at all. If another country has nukes and their software glitches and/or is hacked by terrorists, whose to say they dont pull the trigger? Creating more points of failure is foolish
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:07 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
Not a contradiction at all.
Absolutely. You simply support the status quo of the US being the worlds bully to maintain total power.
Its expensive and deadly, and creates enemies. Its America last and globalist.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:10 am to Yaboylsu63
Could a Cartel purchase a ‘Suitcase’ nuke or Dirty Bomb? This whole thing is about Jihadist Islam holding respect and perceived power in the ME and being regarded on the world stage as legitimate powerbrokers. The Mullahs want the right to enrich uranium just like other sovereign Nations, if they choose. They can have all the ingredients for nuclear weapons at hand without assembly and then claim to not be building nukes. That is like Biden saying that the Border was secure and the Jews won’t fall for that mind game crap. Of course their sworn religious duty to destroy or subjugate the Jews coupled with the martyrdom principle really pushes Israel to act preemptively. Which they are and will continue doing very efficiently.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:28 am to RogerTheShrubber
Did the ukrainian government ever actually own those nukes though? They were left on their land by the soviets but I doubt the ukrainians had the ability to use and maintain them. They definitely wouldn't have had the money to keep them maintained for 30+ years.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:50 am to Yaboylsu63
Trump gave them 60 days, so apparently very close
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:15 am to Thundercles
quote:
They just bring this up anew whenever they need to stir up shite in the middle east.
The "diversionary theory of war" posits that presidents might use foreign conflicts to deflect attention from domestic political or economic problems, potentially boosting their approval ratings or influencing elections.
Clinton used it to distract from his sex scandal
Trump in the Epstein files - next week WW3 starts?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:18 am to Yaboylsu63
They weren’t even developing a nuclear weapon according to our intelligence community as of March 26th.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:46 am to Yaboylsu63
Regardless if it was a week, a month, a year, a decade, it doesn't matter.
Why let them get any closer than they were?
Isreal has done the world a favor.
Why let them get any closer than they were?
Isreal has done the world a favor.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:50 am to Yaboylsu63
If the IAEA us saying a month or 2, i believe them.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:00 pm to theballguy
The problem with that assertion historically is that we have been told this for at least the last 15 years but they have not produced or obtained one.
They could have purchased one from the Russias, their next door neighbors in Pakistan could have supplied them with the tech...but thus far they've never unveiled it. The Israelis have been threatening to do something for at least that long as well.
I'm not discounting , certainly if they showed off for the world you have a bigger problem. Just seems a bit suspect. I think though the actions last year probably changed the equation because they proved they had some competent delivery system to get a a missile that far.
This may be pre emptive because of improvements made on the missiles more than a concrete knowledge of a real nuclear device.
They could have purchased one from the Russias, their next door neighbors in Pakistan could have supplied them with the tech...but thus far they've never unveiled it. The Israelis have been threatening to do something for at least that long as well.
I'm not discounting , certainly if they showed off for the world you have a bigger problem. Just seems a bit suspect. I think though the actions last year probably changed the equation because they proved they had some competent delivery system to get a a missile that far.
This may be pre emptive because of improvements made on the missiles more than a concrete knowledge of a real nuclear device.
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:03 pm to GeauxBurrow312
quote:That enriched uranium needs to be secured.
Bibi claimed in his live address that they had enriched enough uranium to make 9 nuclear warheads
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:03 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:Any day now!
This was in 2012.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:04 pm to Yaboylsu63
Even the IAEA had to admit they were in violation.
They’ve refused to do that for years.
They’ve refused to do that for years.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:07 pm to blueboy
That's my problem. The list above goes back 30 years. Yet, thus far no nuclear weapons.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:08 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
Even the IAEA had to admit they were in violation
That's pretty much the only thing lending any credibility here
Posted on 6/13/25 at 12:09 pm to Yaboylsu63
They've been weeks away from having nukes for over 30 years now.
Popular
Back to top


2











