- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House Judiciary Committee Open Hearing 10AM EST
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:05 am to Colonel Flagg
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:05 am to Colonel Flagg
Just show the Biden video of him bragging about bribing Ukraine
2
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:05 am to cajunangelle
Muh Opinions!
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:05 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
"Obstruction of Congress"? This is really absurd
You have to give it to these lawyers. Very creative and pretty good method acting.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:05 am to rumproast
I'm curious, have any of these expert witnesses ever been qualified to testify before? Let's see the cv's.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:05 am to OchoDedos
quote:
Just show the Biden video of him bragging about bribing Ukraine
I hope someone is smart enough to do this to them!
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:06 am to OchoDedos
quote:
Just show the Biden video of him bragging about bribing Ukraine
yes.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:06 am to DavidTheGnome
One does not get immunity from investigations by running for President. Just ask Trump.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:06 am to arseinclarse
They are horrified that Trump Obstructed Congress...
Withholding that Obama did so and then some with executive privilege and immunity.
Withholding that Obama did so and then some with executive privilege and immunity.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:06 am to IT_Dawg
So according to these "scholars" next time you're in court and have been directed to testify against your spouse and decline, i.e. invoke spousal privilege, you should be arrested and charged with obstruction of justice. Or if your doctor has been subpoenaed to testify about your medical affairs, your doctor invokes doctor-patient privilege and declines to testify about private medical information....obstruction of justice. Or if you invoke your 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination and choose to remain silent....obstruction.
Absolute dishonest fools.
Absolute dishonest fools.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 11:07 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:06 am to arseinclarse
Turley has in the Nixon impeachment, he said at his opening
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:07 am to Colonel Flagg
quote:
So is it not allowable to seek out corruption in general?
I don’t believe anyone ever said that. Should the president be the one seeking that out against his political rivals or leaving it to his justice department?
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:08 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
So Trump didn’t pressure Ukraine to check into Biden and there wasn’t any leveraging of military aid to Ukraine?
No he didn't.
That said, how did you arrive at the conclusion that he did??
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:08 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Should the president be the one seeking that out against his political rivals or leaving it to his justice department?
Which President are you talking about who did this?
Because it wasn't Trump.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:08 am to DavidTheGnome
Ukraine isn't and wasn't a political rival
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:08 am to cajunangelle
Isn't obstructing obstructionists like the totality of the House right now the definition of progressive?
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:08 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Should the president be the one seeking that out against his political rivals or leaving it to his justice department?
Trump specifically said get with Barr. frick!
It's in the damn transcript.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:09 am to JayDeerTay84
Biden’s comments are irrelevant to this inquiry. In fact, whatever Hunter or Joe may
or may not have done has nothing to do with whether Trump committed an impeachable offense and you know it( or at least you should)
or may not have done has nothing to do with whether Trump committed an impeachable offense and you know it( or at least you should)
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:09 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Should the president be the one seeking that out against his political rivals or leaving it to his justice department?
Absolutely not, and that's exactly where the Durham indictments will focus. The complicating factor for you is that everybody on the posters on your bedroom wall will be the ones being indicted.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:09 am to GumboPot
This guy has a punch-able face.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 11:09 am to VoxDawg
Now they are on muh Russia again.
This flaming guy speaking now is a joke.
This flaming guy speaking now is a joke.
Page 19 of 50
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News