- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hillary: Senate GOP set a new precedent in election-year for Supreme Court vacancies!
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:09 am
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:09 am
LINK
quote:
Hillary Clinton
@HillaryClinton
53m
Senate Republicans set a new precedent in 2016 for election-year Supreme Court vacancies.
And that new precedent, which they all defended incredibly passionately, is to wait for the next president.
nbcnews.com
This post was edited on 9/21/20 at 10:10 am
25
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:10 am to Seldom Seen
Ha! Shut up, hag
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:10 am to Seldom Seen
There was nothing new about what they did. Hillary is ignorant or lying. My bet is on lying.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:11 am to Seldom Seen
quote:Why won't you die?!
Hillary Clinton
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:11 am to Seldom Seen
She's looking rough these days
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:13 am to Seldom Seen
She should've never run and we wouldn't be in this situation.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:13 am to Seldom Seen
I still can't fathom being a white male and voting for that hag in 2016
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:13 am to Seldom Seen
And since the next president was a Republican, there is no need to wait now. It’s simple, elections have consequences. We all know that.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:13 am to Seldom Seen
Oh, so now instead of doing what has always been done, they're setting a "new precedent"...
If the Dims had the Senate right now, would they let a Trump nominee go to a vote? You know the answer.
If the Dims had the Senate right now, would they let a Trump nominee go to a vote? You know the answer.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:14 am to Seldom Seen
Just STFU bitch!! Damn...you haven’t quit bitching about 2016...go the frick away already.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:15 am to Seldom Seen
Let's get this process going already. I'm ready for the violence.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:16 am to Seldom Seen
Damn, she hit a wall. Being out of the spotlight has not been kind to her face.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:16 am to Seldom Seen
no one cares you old marxist hag.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:17 am to Seldom Seen
Very, very active. She still has an army of aides to post on her social media accounts. That's a first time I've seen a failed presidential candidate do that. Normally a failed candidate just fades away into the background.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:18 am to Seldom Seen
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:19 am to Seldom Seen
Except it has been done like 17 times, but whatever.
What is rare is to have one in a year where the President's party does NOT control the Senate. It was Joe Biden who suggested that shouldn't happen and Mitch, God bless him, agreed in 2016.
This ISN'T a change. This IS the rule - confirm in a year where the President's party controls the Senate.
Of course, the Rs could have just brought Garland's nomination up and then destroyed him with slander and libel in the press and voted him down. But, then again, Rs are not Ds (Mitt, McCain, Flake, Murk and Collins notwithstanding).
What is rare is to have one in a year where the President's party does NOT control the Senate. It was Joe Biden who suggested that shouldn't happen and Mitch, God bless him, agreed in 2016.
This ISN'T a change. This IS the rule - confirm in a year where the President's party controls the Senate.
Of course, the Rs could have just brought Garland's nomination up and then destroyed him with slander and libel in the press and voted him down. But, then again, Rs are not Ds (Mitt, McCain, Flake, Murk and Collins notwithstanding).
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:27 am to Seldom Seen
In 2016 we were guaranteed to have a new president. Not the case in 2020. But Dems love trying to compare apples and oranges.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:28 am to WildManGoose
quote:
Damn, she hit a wall.
Unfortunately, not hard enough.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:29 am to Seldom Seen
Crooked is looking like shite. She is obviously running low on adrenochrome.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:31 am to GumboPot
I believe the new precedent is actually them following the Biden rule.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News