re: Hamas leader Hamad says “Mistakes were made”.

quote:

---

Someone needs to drone his arse ASAP

---

I would assume that IDF has a drone en route.

quote:

---

We did the same thing here in America to the Indians.

---

Yes, yes we did. Do you understand what you're arguing here?

quote:

---

Your bleeding heart won't change anything. Cry yourself to sleep.

---

Oh, go frick yourself, you pompous arse. You know very little about the situation. I love how you fall back on Biblical passages too. Not only are you a hypocrite (shocking), but you're a rube too.

quote:

---

Oh, go frick yourself, you pompous arse. You know very little about the situation. I love how you fall back on Biblical passages too. Not only are you a hypocrite (shocking), but you're a

---

Easy ole boy. I don't frick myself. Not sure how that works.
I simply believe Israel has every right to defend itself.
Once again, if Palestinians don't like their elected government, they should do something about it. Otherwise, they are part of the problem. Either take control of your life or deal with the consequences of the actions you have chose to represent you.

quote:

---

What? Did you read the post to which I was responding? It was literally calling for genocide.

---

If the Israelites had done as God commanded in the Bible and exterminated all the people occupying the land we would not be seeing this today. Genocide was God’s command originally, just has taken a few thousand years for Israel to get off their asses and get to it.

quote:

---

Yeah, that was the frick Around part. Now, they’re Finding Out.

---

“Welcome to Auschwitz, some of your people collaborate against Germany during WW1….they fricked around, so you’re all about to find out”

You agree?

quote:

---

Well, for your sake, I hope not. If it's the Jesus in the New Testament, I have a slight suspicion that he may have some not nice things to say about the thoughts that you've expressed in this thread. For your sake, I hope it's only that violent Yahweh guy who greets you in the great beyond. You two can sit there and laugh about your bloodlust.

---

Luckily, your not Him. I know my faith in my God and am at peace with it. Jesus never advocated cowardice, there's no grace in being a coward.

They follow Mohammad and don’t even know it?

They remind me of “white supremacists” who have been arrested, have kids out of wedlock, do drugs, want to fight everyone at sonic, collect some form of tax payer subsidy, and praise Jesus while declaring Jihad on anyone who doesn’t believe that they aren’t a true Christian Patriot.

The same way, welfare queens & purple hair sky screamers are a joke of the Democratic Party that conservative liberal intellectuals have to “tolerate”….this trailer trash is what media propagandizes as “conservatives”

So what side were the liberals on in the first few days of this particular conflict. When innocent children, women and the elderly were being slaughtered on tv for the world to see by Hamas?? Seriously I want to know.

quote:

---

Sounds like a great guy that god. How did Jesus turn out to be such a puss with a daddy like that?

---

Mo Jeaux,

According to the undisputed 7 Pauline epistles, and Pauline forgeries such as Ephesians and Colossians, and according to Hebrews, Jesus was Yahweh, the great protector and guardian angel of the Jews who adopted the Jews as his “chosen people” as is recorded in Deuteronomy 32:8-9. In the epistles I mentioned, the great archangel Yahweh took on a body of “sinful flesh” and was sacrificed intentionally and knowingly by descending into the sky below the firmament to be killed by the Archons of this Aeon (Rulers of this Age). Those early Christians did night battle with flesh and blood but rather the Archons who dwelled in the sky and the heavens and also ruled the earth. In the epistles I mentioned, Jesus is never ever called “Theos” (God) not one time. Jesus is always called “Kyrios” (the LORD) or some derivation of “Iesous Kristos” (Jesus Christ).

The Essenes and Pharisees of Paul’s day would have known the difference between “Theos” (God with capital G in English, in Hebrew “El Elyon” the high god and father of the gods) and “Kyrios”. Greek doesn’t show up on this forum, but you can go to Septuagint “LXX” Deut 32 to see how Kyrios is differentiated from Theos.

Kyrios is what Paul and his followers would have called Yahweh. They were Greek-speaking educated literate Jews mostly and they consistently quoted the Septuagint (the Egyptian-Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament into Koine Greek). They quoted the Septuagint version of the Old Testament consistently in their writings and probably couldn’t even read Hebrew.

Paul never called Jesus “son of the LORD”. Not once. In fact no where in the New Testament does anyone ever refer to Jesus as the son of the LORD. On the contrary Jesus is always the son of Theos, the son of God, the son of the Most High God (El Elyon). One of the demons Jesus casts out in the New Testament calls Jesus “son of the Most High God”.

Paul believed in a celestial Jesus who only earned the name Jesus after he had been crucified. The later gospel writers made up stories of Jesus being on earth in order to convert gentiles who were not familiar with Jewish theology as a fable to get them to believe Jesus had died and was resurrected. But none of them thought the god of the Old Testament who was smiting the shite out of the Egyptians, Canaanites, and Jews alike was Jesus’ father. They believed the god - the archangel - who led Moses out of Egypt was Yahweh - aka Jesus before he became flesh.

Marcion of Sinope, the first to compile (or fabricate some say) the epistles of Paul and the Gospel of the LORD into a Bible, who the church later condemned as a Heretic, took issue with early Catholic/orthodox belief that Yahweh was Jesus, that Jesus was Yahweh. He took issue with it because he was like there is no way that evil god in the Jewish scripture is the same deity as our living Jesus. Marcion (or Markion in Greek) wrote a preface to the first ever Bible which he called the Antitheses. In that preface, he explained that there is no freaking way that the Yahweh of the Old Testament was Jesus of the New Testament, and he wrote it specifically to contradict the dominant belief of the time that Jesus was Yahweh.