- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Guess which way Barrett voted today on Trump using the AEA
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:13 pm to HagaDaga
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:13 pm to HagaDaga
Yes
This is why there has to be massive raids and round ups of all illegal aliens ASAP. Get them out and let the law fare continue. Don't bother sorting out which ones are gangbangers. They're all f$#@&^/ criminals.
He's (Trump) not going to honor some moonbat's order regardless.
This is why there has to be massive raids and round ups of all illegal aliens ASAP. Get them out and let the law fare continue. Don't bother sorting out which ones are gangbangers. They're all f$#@&^/ criminals.
He's (Trump) not going to honor some moonbat's order regardless.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 8:14 pm
0
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
IDC. Make it work that way. It was decided in a "trial.". Then kick it up to SCOTUS. POTUS and SCOTUS are equals. They need to take it on, and decide on POTUS matters quickly. It's not some joe blow case that makes its way up..
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:17 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I doubt that the gangs are acting at the direction of any foreign government, but that's not my call.
yeah TdA members definitely werent told to head north, and let loose on our nation by Maduro smfhPosted on 4/7/25 at 8:21 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I don't know, but seems like a pretty simple case.
There is no reason the case should be in DC. People subject to action under the AEA can challenge whether they are subject to it (whether there is a war ir foreign incursuon, and whether they are, in fact, an adversary as so defined) in a habeas proceeding brought in the district they are present.
Why prolong the proceedings in DC just to let it play out as the dissent seems to say?
There is no reason the case should be in DC. People subject to action under the AEA can challenge whether they are subject to it (whether there is a war ir foreign incursuon, and whether they are, in fact, an adversary as so defined) in a habeas proceeding brought in the district they are present.
Why prolong the proceedings in DC just to let it play out as the dissent seems to say?
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:25 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
yeah TdA members definitely werent told to head north, and let loose on our nation by Maduro ? smfh
I would be curious to see any evidence of that, but the President doesn't have to show it. He can just decree it. Of course, I am OK with that.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:33 pm to JimEverett
quote:
don't know, but seems like a pretty simple case.
There is no reason the case should be in DC. People subject to action under the AEA can challenge whether they are subject to it (whether there is a war ir foreign incursuon, and whether they are, in fact, an adversary as so defined) in a habeas proceeding brought in the district they are present.
Why prolong the proceedings in DC just to let it play out as the dissent seems to say?
I think Barrett was wrong. I don't think that makes her a traitor (not saying that you think that way). She doesn't owe loyalty to the president that appointed her.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:35 pm to JimEverett
quote:
There is no reason the case should be in DC. People subject to action under the AEA can challenge whether they are subject to it (whether there is a war ir foreign incursuon, and whether they are, in fact, an adversary as so defined) in a habeas proceeding brought in the district they are present.
I think the issue in this case is that the admin was making this impossible, which is why the ruling today created the notice/opportunity requirement, so they could file in A court, if they so chose.
I don't think the guys in this current litigation ever had the ability to file b/c of how they were taken and moved so quickly without notice.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:35 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Oh, then i agree with you 100%
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:38 pm to stout
I've criticized her on here, and even called her Trump's David Souter.
However, on this one, let me play devil's advocate. Maybe she knew the 5 were voting for, and she sided with the left to keep the 'pack the court', 'Trump's picks are tyrants', etc. crowd quiet.
Seems like with the 3 Trump picks, at least 1 goes against Trump in his victories. Could this be part of the famous 4D chess to keep the lunatics from blaming everything on 'Trump's Court'
Not saying it's true, but just a thought. Just seems odd that of the 3, one seems to break ranks on controversial decisions...especially if Trump is going to prevail with 5 votes. Note, this only applies to the 3 Trump appointees, not turncoat John Roberts.
However, on this one, let me play devil's advocate. Maybe she knew the 5 were voting for, and she sided with the left to keep the 'pack the court', 'Trump's picks are tyrants', etc. crowd quiet.
Seems like with the 3 Trump picks, at least 1 goes against Trump in his victories. Could this be part of the famous 4D chess to keep the lunatics from blaming everything on 'Trump's Court'
Not saying it's true, but just a thought. Just seems odd that of the 3, one seems to break ranks on controversial decisions...especially if Trump is going to prevail with 5 votes. Note, this only applies to the 3 Trump appointees, not turncoat John Roberts.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:43 pm to hogwildinhouston
Maybe
But damn sure the three idiots are always walking lockstep with their party. No matter how off the wall the case is.
But damn sure the three idiots are always walking lockstep with their party. No matter how off the wall the case is.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:54 pm to stout
They are PLAYING POLITICS. They know they have 6 votes, so to APPEASE THE CRAZIES on the left whom they seem scared of, and with good cause, they are almost always voting 5-4 or even giving the other side a win on temp. cases, before the cases are heard in full.
However, they usually get to 5 in the end.
However, they usually get to 5 in the end.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:55 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Some of y'all are some serious racists
I'm a white Southern guy hating on white Southern women. How is that racist?
quote:
without the ability to recognize Christian charity.
Is it really Christian charity if the goal is to obtain praise and adulation from others? I view these adoptions in much the same way I do Hollywood stars who adopt foreign children: it's about projecting an image.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:58 pm to stout
The average tigerdroppings poster would be a better judge than half of the Supreme Court for the simple reason they would just read and follow what the Constitution clearly says.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 9:02 pm to stout
She’s not so mad now.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:52 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
I view these adoptions in much the same way I do Hollywood stars who adopt foreign children: it's about projecting an image
Spot on. It's liberal "Christian" women's version of a celebrity having a trans kid
Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:24 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
I'm a white Southern guy hating on white Southern women. How is that racist?
You think race is so determanitive that it makes adoption across race suspect. As a Christian, I think there's only the human race.
quote:
Is it really Christian charity if the goal is to obtain praise and adulation from others? I view these adoptions in much the same way I do Hollywood stars who adopt foreign children: it's about projecting an image.
On the face of it, adopting children is a very generous, loving act. You're able to judge people's hearts, especially people you don't even know?
I'm sorry, you just seem like a hateful, withered person.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:51 pm to stout
If Lisa Murkowski were a judge…
Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:56 pm to stout
Damn, this makes me mad. I kept hearing that she was the Shohei Ohtani of judges. Turns out she's a bought-and-paid-for utility player.
She's either paid off, or else menopause is kicking her arse. What a two-faced BITCH!
She's either paid off, or else menopause is kicking her arse. What a two-faced BITCH!
Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:59 pm to John Barron
Wow those eye-daggers holy sh*t boys.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think the guys in this current litigation ever had the ability to file b/c of how they were taken and moved so quickly without notice.
The government from the start of the litigation in Boasberg's court has argued that the persons subject to AEA have judicial rights - they have a right to file a habeas petition. The named plaintiffs did file those petitions and then dropped them.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News