re: Guess which way Barrett voted today on Trump using the AEA

I never trusted her from the moment he nominated her.

But I personally would never vote for or support any woman for any type office or position of power.

They can't be trusted because of emotions.

quote:

---

You shouldn’t be able to “trust” a judge.

---

I guarantee you the far-leftists can trust their SC appointees.

fricking ideological communists all.

It sounds like you are still ideologically living in the pre-globalist era.

quote:

---

I never trusted her from the moment he nominated her.

But I personally would never vote for or support any woman for any type office or position of power.

They can't be trusted because of emotions.

---

It's the combination of emotions and hormones.....must be the ovaries.

At least she doesn't eat meat on Fridays durn lent.

The female Roberts

If you read the opinion, she only joined with the dissent for part 2 and 3. So she did not disagree with if Trump had the power to do so or the fact that this was a mistake to hear this case in D.C. due to jurisdiction, only that how the Supreme Court in essence neutered the judge before it had a chance to play through the process and the fact that this case, not one with less conflict opting issues, is being used to define how the AEA works.

I don’t necessarily agree with her on 2, but I can agree to a point on 3. It reads like the real
Issue here is how advisoriol the executive and judicial were in this case and it should have had more time to process through the system vs. how it was handled.

On that point, my answer is that so to their inaction there is now legislation working it’s way through the system to attempt to neuter the power of federal district court judges and a censure measure of the judge in question being debated. If they would have acted earlier none of this would have been and issue and now the judiciary is not likely going to see some sort of reprisal from the legislature.

I still believe she chickened out and should have gone 6-3 in main and dissented in part, but it still the same result. Most likely she kept it the way she did so Robert’s could write a more watered down majority than a 5-4 written by Alito or Thomas.

Wonder why her sister has been swatted.

Thank you. I was going to say, what if she simply said we are not at war or didn't have a predatory incursion or whatever? What if president AOC didn't check the boxes on the law? Would we want her doing the same things with no check on her power?

She adopted two kids from Haiti.

Tells me enough.