Started By
Message

re: Goldman Sachs to Refuse IPOs If All Directors Are White, Straight Men

Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:36 pm to
Posted by TigerTailsSoup
Member since Sep 2005
10842 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:36 pm to
Don't start a public company in CA
Don't apply for an IPO through Sacks

Done
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
18869 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

White, Straight Men


If you change any one of those words it’s discrimination and progs lose their shite
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 5:05 pm to
Does anyone know if Jews are considered “white” by Goldman Sachs in their analysis? I am seriously asking.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80126 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 5:06 pm to
Just get one of them to identify as a woman.


Problem solved.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112662 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 9:03 am to
Told my wife about this. She lost her shite.

WHat?!?!?!?

So...they have to put someone on the board that they may not want and may not be qualified?

That's stupid!
Posted by ocelot4ark
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2009
12536 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 10:17 am to
quote:

So...they have to put someone on the board that they may not want and may not be qualified?



I think this requirement is fricking retarded and likely illegal.

With that said, if you can't find a qualified woman to be on your Board in 2020, you have a crazy idea for what it means to be qualified or you're just not trying.

Been dealing with high-level, fortune 500-type Boards for almost a decade. They all have women. Some of the women are fricking badass. Some are marginal. Some suck. Pretty much like the men. But the pool to choose from isn't shallow.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Goldman Sachs to Refuse IPOs If All Directors Are White, Straight Men
Sounds like an invitation to pointless tokenism.
This post was edited on 1/25/20 at 10:35 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53778 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Does anyone know if Jews are considered “white” by Goldman Sachs in their analysis? I am seriously asking.
how many black Jews do you know?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62595 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Public companies with all-male boards based in California now face a $100,000 fine under a new state law.
That’s institutional sexism.
Posted by cajuncarguy
On the road...Again!
Member since Jun 2013
3135 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:12 am to
That can't be legal under the constitution. That discriminates against straight white males.
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
20323 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Sounds like discrimination.

Sounds more like stupidity. Race has nothing to do with profit and profit is the name of the game.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43947 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Sounds like discrimination.


Race discrimination

Sexual orientation discrimination

Gender discrimination

It is a good day to be a lawyer in Cali because they gonna get paid.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63208 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

“It’s what big investors are looking for these days,”
fricking bullshite. Yeah, if you say so, little dipshit c-tier college professor.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram