- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Glenn Greenwald: ZERO people arrested for Capitol invasion were members of Parler
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:29 am
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:29 am
quote:
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
Replying to
@ggreenwald
Do you know how many of the people arrested in connection with the Capitol invasion were active users of Parler?
Zero.
The planning was largely done on Facebook. This is all a bullshite pretext for silencing competitors on ideological grounds: just the start.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:32 am to Contra
How can he know this?
Does he even have the exhaustive list of those arrested to even try to investigate the claim?
Are we still just accepting what random folks spout off?
Give us evidence so it can be used.
Because let’s be fair, while I don’t think Parler is the smoking gun of planning it’s made out to be, I find it hard to believe not even one person who entered the capital had a Parler account they used....even if they didn’t use it to plan.
Does he even have the exhaustive list of those arrested to even try to investigate the claim?
Are we still just accepting what random folks spout off?
Give us evidence so it can be used.
Because let’s be fair, while I don’t think Parler is the smoking gun of planning it’s made out to be, I find it hard to believe not even one person who entered the capital had a Parler account they used....even if they didn’t use it to plan.
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 11:39 am
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:34 am to Contra
The only way to prevent this is for Apple to perma ban Facebook. Should be immediately removed from the App Store IMO
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:36 am to Volvagia
Random folks?
quote:
In June 2013, while at The Guardian, he began publishing a series of reports detailing previously unknown information about American and British global surveillance programs based on classified documents provided by Edward Snowden. Along with other reporters, Greenwald won both a George Polk Award and a Pulitzer Prize for the reporting. He has also written best-selling books, including No Place to Hide. In 2014, he, Laura Poitras and Jeremy Scahill, launched The Intercept, for which he was co-founding editor until he resigned in October 2020. Greenwald then moved to Substack, an online newsletter-based journalism platform
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:39 am to Contra
And this means he has a list of everyone arrested and the list of Parler account identities to match up?
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:40 am to Volvagia
lol at these idiot lefties doubting Glenn
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:40 am to Volvagia
quote:
Does he even have the exhaustive list of those arrested to even try to investigate the claim?
Fair point, but has Apple ever provided examples of Parler being used to plan the “attack”?
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:41 am to Volvagia
quote:
Are we still just accepting what random folks spout off?
Do you know who GG is?
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:41 am to swolverine
Nope.
But you can’t beat bullshite with more bullshite.
But you can’t beat bullshite with more bullshite.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:45 am to Volvagia
Volva, why don’t you tweet him and ask him? I know why, because he will give you an answer you don’t want to hear.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:47 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Do you know who GG is?
Yes.
To clarify “nobody” was meant in this specific context.
He is making a claim about something he has no first hand knowledge of, and he isn’t supporting the claim.
Without that validation, he is literally no different than a Joe Dirt twitting away.
Or are we just gonna pretend all of the tweets by people with past pedigrees that turned out to be BS never happened.
Lost count the number of times I heard on the EB “Wow, I’d question it typically, but if XXX is talking about it, there MUST be something coming.”
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:48 am to Contra
This guy doesn't have a Parler account? I am skeptical...


Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:48 am to Contra
There goes Toddy's argument...
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:49 am to mmcgrath
quote:
I am skeptical...
quote:
mmcgrath
Having difficulty dealing with getting played?
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:51 am to Volvagia
quote:
He is making a claim about something he has no first hand knowledge of, and he isn’t supporting the claim.
Without that validation, he is literally no different than a Joe Dirt twitting away.
Or are we just gonna pretend all of the tweets by people with past pedigrees that turned out to be BS never happened.
Lost count the number of times I heard on the EB “Wow, I’d question it typically, but if XXX is talking about it, there MUST be something coming.”
Glenn Greenwald, notorious anti-Trump figure, typically doesn't report on things like this unless he's done his homework. I guess I can't blame you for wanting him to show his work, but I don't distrust the guy enough to think he did this without doing his research.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:51 am to swolverine
quote:
Fair point, but has Apple ever provided examples of Parler being used to plan the “attack”?
Nope...just going to listen to POTUS speak and tell at the Capitol
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:53 am to mauser
quote:
Volva, why don’t you tweet him and ask him? I know why, because he will give you an answer you don’t want to hear.
Nah. It’s mostly because unlike all of the other hypocrites here, I don’t use twitter.
I’m not calling him a liar either.
I’m just not immediately internalizing what someone said on twitter just because I want it to be true.
That’s a pretty big claim, and would be highly damning ammo to use. Gonna need more than a “trust me, bro.”
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:02 pm to Volvagia
quote:
He is making a claim about something he has no first hand knowledge of, and he isn’t supporting the claim.
Seems like you're the one doing that. Because Greenwald didn't include everything he has in a tweet doesn't mean he doesn't have it. Greenwald is credible. It would be unusual for him to be making shite up. You, you don't have that credibility.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:12 pm to Volvagia
What Greenwald said: Do you know how many of the people arrested in connection with the Capitol invasion were active users of Parler?
Zero.
What you said: I find it hard to believe not even one person who entered the capital had a Parler account they used..
Zero.
What you said: I find it hard to believe not even one person who entered the capital had a Parler account they used..
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:24 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Well given they are arresting everyone they can identify who entered the capital, it seems kinda semantics to separate the two.
Otherwise you’ll end up in a situation where even if the tweet is true now, it might not be tomorrow.
Otherwise you’ll end up in a situation where even if the tweet is true now, it might not be tomorrow.
Popular
Back to top

4





