Started By
Message
locked post

Glenn Greenwald: ZERO people arrested for Capitol invasion were members of Parler

Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:29 am
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
9568 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:29 am
quote:

Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
Replying to
@ggreenwald
Do you know how many of the people arrested in connection with the Capitol invasion were active users of Parler?

Zero.

The planning was largely done on Facebook. This is all a bullshite pretext for silencing competitors on ideological grounds: just the start.

Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53467 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:32 am to
How can he know this?

Does he even have the exhaustive list of those arrested to even try to investigate the claim?

Are we still just accepting what random folks spout off?

Give us evidence so it can be used.

Because let’s be fair, while I don’t think Parler is the smoking gun of planning it’s made out to be, I find it hard to believe not even one person who entered the capital had a Parler account they used....even if they didn’t use it to plan.
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 11:39 am
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
14304 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:34 am to
The only way to prevent this is for Apple to perma ban Facebook. Should be immediately removed from the App Store IMO
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
9568 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:36 am to
Random folks?

quote:

In June 2013, while at The Guardian, he began publishing a series of reports detailing previously unknown information about American and British global surveillance programs based on classified documents provided by Edward Snowden. Along with other reporters, Greenwald won both a George Polk Award and a Pulitzer Prize for the reporting. He has also written best-selling books, including No Place to Hide. In 2014, he, Laura Poitras and Jeremy Scahill, launched The Intercept, for which he was co-founding editor until he resigned in October 2020. Greenwald then moved to Substack, an online newsletter-based journalism platform
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53467 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:39 am to
And this means he has a list of everyone arrested and the list of Parler account identities to match up?

Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15734 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:40 am to
lol at these idiot lefties doubting Glenn
Posted by swolverine
Member since Jun 2020
1966 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Does he even have the exhaustive list of those arrested to even try to investigate the claim?



Fair point, but has Apple ever provided examples of Parler being used to plan the “attack”?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138925 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Are we still just accepting what random folks spout off?

Do you know who GG is?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53467 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:41 am to
Nope.

But you can’t beat bullshite with more bullshite.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26938 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:45 am to
Volva, why don’t you tweet him and ask him? I know why, because he will give you an answer you don’t want to hear.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53467 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Do you know who GG is?


Yes.

To clarify “nobody” was meant in this specific context.

He is making a claim about something he has no first hand knowledge of, and he isn’t supporting the claim.

Without that validation, he is literally no different than a Joe Dirt twitting away.

Or are we just gonna pretend all of the tweets by people with past pedigrees that turned out to be BS never happened.

Lost count the number of times I heard on the EB “Wow, I’d question it typically, but if XXX is talking about it, there MUST be something coming.”
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 11:48 am
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37341 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:48 am to
This guy doesn't have a Parler account? I am skeptical...

Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:48 am to
There goes Toddy's argument...
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:49 am to
quote:

I am skeptical...

quote:

mmcgrath


Having difficulty dealing with getting played?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138925 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:51 am to
quote:

He is making a claim about something he has no first hand knowledge of, and he isn’t supporting the claim.

Without that validation, he is literally no different than a Joe Dirt twitting away.

Or are we just gonna pretend all of the tweets by people with past pedigrees that turned out to be BS never happened.

Lost count the number of times I heard on the EB “Wow, I’d question it typically, but if XXX is talking about it, there MUST be something coming.”

Glenn Greenwald, notorious anti-Trump figure, typically doesn't report on things like this unless he's done his homework. I guess I can't blame you for wanting him to show his work, but I don't distrust the guy enough to think he did this without doing his research.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:51 am to
quote:


Fair point, but has Apple ever provided examples of Parler being used to plan the “attack”?


Nope...just going to listen to POTUS speak and tell at the Capitol
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53467 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Volva, why don’t you tweet him and ask him? I know why, because he will give you an answer you don’t want to hear.


Nah. It’s mostly because unlike all of the other hypocrites here, I don’t use twitter.

I’m not calling him a liar either.

I’m just not immediately internalizing what someone said on twitter just because I want it to be true.

That’s a pretty big claim, and would be highly damning ammo to use. Gonna need more than a “trust me, bro.”

Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22736 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

He is making a claim about something he has no first hand knowledge of, and he isn’t supporting the claim.

Seems like you're the one doing that. Because Greenwald didn't include everything he has in a tweet doesn't mean he doesn't have it. Greenwald is credible. It would be unusual for him to be making shite up. You, you don't have that credibility.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35538 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:12 pm to
What Greenwald said: Do you know how many of the people arrested in connection with the Capitol invasion were active users of Parler?

Zero.

What you said: I find it hard to believe not even one person who entered the capital had a Parler account they used..
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53467 posts
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:24 pm to
Well given they are arresting everyone they can identify who entered the capital, it seems kinda semantics to separate the two.

Otherwise you’ll end up in a situation where even if the tweet is true now, it might not be tomorrow.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram