- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
GLAAD is sad fewer movies feature trannies & assorted alphabet people
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:26 am
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:26 am
Tut, tut. There are still far too many that do.
GLAAD releases 'particularly concerning' report showing shrinking LGBTQ representation third year in a row
quote:
In 2023, GLAAD reported a record 28.5% — or 100 out of 350 films released in 2022 — featured LGBTQ characters. The number dropped to 27.3% for 2023 films before plunging to 23.6% in 2024.
In 2025, the number dropped to only 20.4%, or 46 out of 225 films, featuring LGBTQ characters with a total of zero transgender characters across theatrical and streaming releases.
GLAAD releases 'particularly concerning' report showing shrinking LGBTQ representation third year in a row
21
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:28 am to uggabugga
Ever think that non alphabet people are tired of seeing them on screen.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:31 am to uggabugga
In the name of equity, all things should be equal to the % of that population nationwide.
There.
Represented per your population.
Still have some reductions needed to be fair.
I’m sure they would never want to be over represented. Taking more than their fair share would be hypocritical…
There.
Represented per your population.
Still have some reductions needed to be fair.
I’m sure they would never want to be over represented. Taking more than their fair share would be hypocritical…
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:32 am to uggabugga
I’d really enjoy seeing a Margaret Sanger biopic where Margaret is cast as a black, wheelchair bound tranny.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:33 am to uggabugga
They are still featured in one fifth of all new movies.
That's still too damn high.
That's still too damn high.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 11:33 am to prplngldtigr
A more realistic 3-4% would be a huge improvement.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 12:59 pm to uggabugga
Why don't they finance, and make whatever movies they want? Why force others to make movies about degens? others don't want to because these movies appeal to such a small percentage, and they would surely lose money. Nobody makes movies for the art. They make them to make money.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 1:05 pm to TideSaint
quote:
still featured in one fifth of all new movies. That's still too damn high.
Still 100 times too many.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 1:23 pm to Hangit
quote:
Nobody makes movies for the art. They make them to make money.
quote:
Nobody makes movies for the art. They make them to make money.
Sorry, I had to repeat that. Three times and MAYBE woke Disney and woke Hollywood will get the memo.
In triplicate, and all that..
Posted on 7/12/26 at 1:26 pm to uggabugga
It's not "particularly disturbing".
It's virtue signaling. And the numbers are probably skewed anyway. (Or not, I haven't watched anything from the woke media industry here in the US since the first Infinity Wars movie).
It's virtue signaling. And the numbers are probably skewed anyway. (Or not, I haven't watched anything from the woke media industry here in the US since the first Infinity Wars movie).
Posted on 7/12/26 at 1:37 pm to uggabugga
Well, GLAAD can use the millions of dollars they "earned" through investments and revenue to fund their own movie that features a 100% LGTVUHD4K+ cast. Then, after not even breaking even at the box office, they'll understand why Hollywood is decreasing the amount of degenerates in their movies l.
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 7/12/26 at 1:56 pm to uggabugga
Concerned as F! Particularly so
Posted on 7/12/26 at 2:02 pm to uggabugga
“Particularly concerning” to whom? GLAAD? Who gives a solid shite what they think.
The TV and film industry has to realize by now that catering to this nonsense is costing them a ton of money.
The TV and film industry has to realize by now that catering to this nonsense is costing them a ton of money.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 2:13 pm to uggabugga
They are finally having to face the reality that hardly anyone wants entertainment with gay/bi/tranny characters, including their own people.
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 7/12/26 at 2:15 pm to PuertoRicanBlaze
quote:
LGTVUHD4K+
Excellent
Posted on 7/12/26 at 2:25 pm to uggabugga
Cuz they are fricking weird and sick and regular people don't want to dee that anymore.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 3:27 pm to uggabugga
It's leadership, probably.
Everyday gays and lesbians likely don't give a tinker's damn.
Everyday gays and lesbians likely don't give a tinker's damn.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 4:30 pm to uggabugga
quote:
GLAAD is sad
This makes me glad.
Posted on 7/12/26 at 6:21 pm to Bernie Bierman
quote:
I’d really enjoy seeing a Margaret Sanger biopic where Margaret is cast as a black, wheelchair bound tranny.
This would kill…
Posted on 7/12/26 at 6:39 pm to uggabugga
nobody watches that gross shite
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News