- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Giuliani concedes he made false statements about Ruby Freeman and her daughter.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 1:37 pm to Adam Banks
Posted on 7/26/23 at 1:37 pm to Adam Banks
Rudy’s not here. You are.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 1:45 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
“Defendant Giuliani, for the purposes of litigation only, does not contest that, to the extent the statements were statements of fact and other wise actionable..."
It boggles my mind that highly paid professionals at this level and in cases this significant submit careless errors like this.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 1:53 pm to NC_Tigah
I think the DOJ intentionally hid Hunters laptop.
I think the left practiced large scale ballot harvesting which is legal in many states but unethical
And there was an untold amount of mail in ballot fraud. Not to the level to change the outcome.
The first two was probably to the level to change the outcome.
I also think it’s asinine to vote first choice for the person that was supposed to oversee the DOJ that hid hunters laptop and the guy who did not know or was not proactive to start the process to do some harvesting of his own. It was a hot topic PRIOR to the election.
I think the left practiced large scale ballot harvesting which is legal in many states but unethical
And there was an untold amount of mail in ballot fraud. Not to the level to change the outcome.
The first two was probably to the level to change the outcome.
I also think it’s asinine to vote first choice for the person that was supposed to oversee the DOJ that hid hunters laptop and the guy who did not know or was not proactive to start the process to do some harvesting of his own. It was a hot topic PRIOR to the election.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 1:57 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Not to the level to change the outcome.
With 81M votes* attached, how in the world can you draw that conclusion?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 2:04 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
I think the left practiced large scale ballot harvesting which is legal in many states but unethical
But it's not always legal even in states that allow it. I know Georgia and Arizona have narrowly defined who can turn in your ballot for you. Illegal harvesting, key word being illegal, was done by the damned truckload in those states. That's not just unethical, that's fraud.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 2:06 pm to au4you
quote:
Joe Rogan
quote:
Lol
Not sure why this is lol, he has a pretty huge, bipartisan, national audience.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 2:11 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
With 81M votes* attached, how in the world can you draw that conclusion?
My opinion.
Your opinion is it did.
You are drawing a conclusion that will never get proven. It is no more nor less valid than mine.
I’m making an inference based on people who have seen actual evidence one by one back off.
The other reason I am making that inference is young professionals in fields and lifestyles that had absolutely no business supporting Joe Biden based on his policies were vocally supportive of him despite not supporting any other democratic candidate purely out of spite to Trump.
I didn’t agree with them and tried to get them to see the idiocy if that to no avail.
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 7/26/23 at 2:35 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
And there was an untold amount of mail in ballot fraud. Not to the level to change the outcome.
If you can't quantify or bound it then how do you know if it could've affected the outcome? How many votes is an "untold amount?"
Posted on 7/26/23 at 3:48 pm to Dday63
quote:
Then you aren't looking very hard. The GBI investigated the whole thing and posted a full explanation.
Thanks, I just read the report. A few things stick out:
1. Every witness agreed they were under the impression that they were done for the night, as indicated in the explanation of why the boxes were under tables (they were sealed for the night). Many employees left for the evening. Not one of the witnesses provided a name as to who instructed them to do so, and only the republican poll watchers offered a description of the person.
2. Poll watcher sought clarification as to whether they were done for the evening and were not provided a clear answer. They eventually left. The point was made several times that they did so on their own. Clearly, an election an employee provided direction to close up shop for the night.
3. Ralph Jones arrived 3 minutes (on camera) after the media left. All of the witnesses that remained said that Ralph Jones made the call (or received a call directing him) to resume counting. However, Ralph indicated that Moss (freeman’s daughter) managed the operations at State Farm.
4. None of the interviewers revealed why they were still there, even after preparing to go home.
I could go on. But I remain unclear as to why they packed up, sent employees home, allowed media and poll watchers to leave, and then immediately proceeded to count again. Who shut them down, and why? Was there a colluded effort to send the public home, and then resume counting? As far as the investigation goes, the report gives zero indication they were even seeking this information.
Moreover, there is zero scrutiny placed on the decision to resume counting with the public not there, despite a reasonable basis to conclude counting was over. The media even reported it was over that night, which the public could be assumed to rely upon.
I can see if you didn’t go into it with any questions of your own, or he report provides you with an answer.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 3:55 pm to Jon Ham
Yes.
18 state ag's filed suit opposing the stolen election.
18 state ag's filed suit opposing the stolen election.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 3:55 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
If you can't quantify or bound it then how do you know if it could've affected the outcome? How many votes is an "untold amount?"
Fraud is fraud. In Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, if the fraud risk cannot be mitigated to a quantifiable and reasonable level, the published results cannot be relied upon regardless of the published results being audited.
Auditing standards related to fraud
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:18 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
conspiracy theorists
Not theorist. We saw the video.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:21 pm to Adam Banks
quote:"Never" is a long, long time.
You are drawing a conclusion that will never get proven
And to clarify, "conclusion" is not what I'm drawing. We don't have the facts to draw an absolute conclusion. WE SHOULD! But we don't.
Why?
Because fact-finding has been blocked at every juncture. Just as it has been with the Hunter Laptop, Covid Origins, Biden bribery, J6, etc. The DOJ/FBI engaged in consistently unilateral, partisan action. Courts used dubious rulings including absurd findings re: "standing" to aid fact suppression. I've been around long enough to find those actions quite suspicious.
So for me, it's the old "looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck" premise.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:27 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Because fact-finding has been blocked at every juncture.
No, it hasn't. You just want to believe it has.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:34 pm to Dday63
quote:Standing was JUST GRANTED for citizens in Georgia nitwit.
No, it hasn't.
Standing was refused in WI pre-election because there was not yet demonstrable harm. In the aftermath, the same court refused to enforce the law because .... wait4it .... the court was not willing to overturn a presidential election result. The same was true of differential handling of VBM ballots in PA.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:41 pm to OceanMan
quote:
I can see if you didn’t go into it with any questions of your own, or he report provides you with an answer.
Well, at least you have changed your questions. You said you could not understand why the actions of Freeman and Moss were allowed, but now you are just curious about the details.
I had a few myself...The report I read never stated when the decision to send ballot counters home occurred. There were references made to "after that decision", but no clear statement of when that happened. Don't know if it was redacted or just not clearly written.
Ralph Jones did not say it was Moss's call. He said when he got to State Farm Arena he got a call from Fulton County Elections Director Richard Ballard asking them to continue counting, so he and Moss agreed to get everyone back to work.
I'm not sure why you are confused by the rest. Not everyone had left. They. Have a lot of security measures to take care of before going home. Once the decision was made to resume counting, why not start immediately? There is no legal requirement to wait for poll watchers to return.
Granted, it was an unusual situation, but it doesn't rise to the level of fraud. The "suitcases under the tables" were placed there with poll watchers watching and security cameras rolling. Nothing nefarious there. Counting ballots with no poll watchers there possibly creates an opportunity for fraud, but there is no evidence fraud actually occurred.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:55 pm to Dday63
quote:... and the Fulton County DVS Test Center? Tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of machine ballots generated, inexplicably indistinguishable from election day ballots. Never secured. Never audited. What of those?
Granted, it was an unusual situation, but it doesn't rise to the level of fraud. The "suitcases under the tables" were placed there with poll watchers watching and security cameras rolling. Nothing nefarious there. Counting ballots with no poll watchers there possibly creates an opportunity for fraud, but there is no evidence fraud actually occurred.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:59 pm to Dday63
quote:
Granted, it was an unusual situation
This is the path the Republican Party should take.
Lots of unusual situations.
Anyone who types out the bullshite tripe you typed out to pretend it was truthful should be immediately sent to a padded room.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 4:59 pm to Warboo
quote:
It is painful watching idiots that call their selves conservative republicans gleefully bask in any down fall of the current leader of GOP primary
They're basking in the down fall of a fricking idiot circus.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 5:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
a fricking idiot circus.
A reference to Biden, a crooked FBI, crooked DOJ, and a crooked media ... certainly?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News