re: Giglio Violation... Flynn may get out of charges

What about him being reimbursed for his attorneys?

Im no legal expert, but constitutional violations are a great way to get charges tossed. There is way too much questionable stuff going on with this entire investigation. If half of what we’ve heard is true, it sounds like a shite show. Personally im all for making Muller and his band of merry men repay expenses out of their own pocket if this is the kind of investigation they are running.

I can see that being the case.

Found this from DOJ manual:

quote:

---

Because Brady and Giglio are constitutional obligations, Brady/Giglio evidence must be disclosed regardless of whether the defendant makes a request for exculpatory or impeachment evidence. Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 432-33 (1995). Neither the Constitution nor this policy, however, creates a general discovery right for trial preparation or plea negotiations. U.S. v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 629 (2002); Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545, 559 (1977).

---

LINK

I'm about to jump in the shower and go hang out with the missus, but I'll check back in later.

quote:

---

There are some very good theories out there showing a precise timeline that everything from Flynn’s appointment to his plea was an elaborate COINTELPRO to smoke out Mueller’s people, and it worked. Flynn’s counterpart who stayed on has access to all the raw SIGINT from NSA. That’s how they got Strzok’s texts

---

That would explain how someone like Flynn was nailed so (relatively) easily.

quote:

---

Maybe a judge will have to determine if that information is exculpatory enough to trigger Brady, but I don’t see how it’s Giglio.

---

quote:

---

Following Brady, the prosecutor must disclose evidence or information that would prove the innocence of the defendant or would enable the defense to more effectively impeach the credibility of government witnesses.

---

ETA: it's a quagmire of timing and substantive issues with variations by court. Pleas may not be covered.

I'm sure I am in the minority here... but Flynn actually strikes me as the type of guy with some self-respect and integrity.

Even if he could, I'm thinking he would balk at getting out of the charges on a technicality at this point.

quote:

---

I'm sure I am in the minority here... but Flynn actually strikes me as the type of guy with some self-respect and integrity. Even if he could, I'm thinking he would balk at getting out of the charges on a technicality at this point.

---

You're not in the minority on this Board, buddy, re Flynn. The guy sold His house and gave up when the ruthless Meuller threated His (Flynn's) Son with ruin too.

This is THE greatest corruption of our Government since the Founding. NONE of this would have ever seen the light of day had Hillary won. And just think where She would have taken us from that point. You could kiss this Board goodbye; we'd all have to hit the woods.

quote:

---

He plead guilty, so that's that.

BUT,

---

Nope.. thus the SCOTUS ruled on it.

quote:

---

The delusions are abundant.

---

So 7 mil, 15mil whatever Honest Bob has racked up for two lying to the FBIs. One has no witness. What is delusional is real charges.

Second upvote is mine