- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Giglio Violation... Flynn may get out of charges
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:11 pm to Jjdoc
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:11 pm to Jjdoc
I don't give a damn about legalistic horse shite. The same exact piece of shite let's the clinton bitches get away with blatant lies and doesn't even bother to tape her and then turns around and charges Flynn for doing the same exact thing is selective prosecution at best.
That is true banana republic shite, just charge who you want to based on whether you oppose them politically.
That is true banana republic shite, just charge who you want to based on whether you oppose them politically.
0
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:20 pm to Jjdoc
Nice but a moot point.
Pardons are coming. Tick Tock.
Pardons are coming. Tick Tock.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 8:52 am to boosiebadazz
quote:I really don't know what you're saying here. There would be no trial. The witness no longer exists.
Sure, but does that invalidate the entire document?
[a year later at trial]
“So Mr. Flynn, did you go before a judge on (date) and swear that...?”
I don’t know that answer. Thankfully the last criminal law exposure I had was 6 years ago.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 9:22 am to AlxTgr
quote:
There would be no trial. The witness no longer exists.
Correct!
And the Storkeman isn't the only one that will give the Mueller team this same problem.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 10:11 am to ninthward
quote:
So 7 mil, 15mil whatever Honest Bob has racked up for two lying to the FBIs.
This is a travesty of justice, because without an inept SC being appointed, you wouldn't even have these.
Because these 'crimes' didn't exist, prior to Mueller being hired
Posted on 12/6/17 at 10:30 am to Jjdoc
It depends....and I don't like taking cues from the Gateway Pundit, but we would have to find if the testimony or answers given t he FBI Agent were either recorded or videoed. If memory serves, when the FBI interviews you, they usually just take hand written notes.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 11:35 am to AlxTgr
quote:
quote: Sure, but does that invalidate the entire document? [a year later at trial] “So Mr. Flynn, did you go before a judge on (date) and swear that...?” I don’t know that answer.
Thankfully the last criminal law exposure I had was 6 years ago.
I really don't know what you're saying here. There would be no trial. The witness no longer exists.
Even if it's a pleading/hearing matter, unless the interview was recorded, Flynn states "I did not agree with the US Attys conclusion that I was not truthful but concluded under the circumstances that I had little or no chance of successfully contesting it and that accepting the plea was the only viable option.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News