- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Ghislaine Maxwell's case details are too sensational and impure for public, judge says
Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:19 pm
New York Post
And the judge is a fricking woman too. I'm guessing she woke up to this yesterday.

quote:
A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too “sensational and impure” to reveal to the public.
US District Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a ruling on redactions that Maxwell had asked for regarding transcripts the government filed under seal last month.
“Those portions of the transcript, which were redacted in the civil matter, concern privacy interests and their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’” Nathan wrote in the order.
The judge also granted redactions that prosecutors made when filing the transcript. Prosecutors had argued the redactions were necessary to “protect the integrity” of the investigation into Maxwell and to protect the privacy of third parties.
And the judge is a fricking woman too. I'm guessing she woke up to this yesterday.


Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:26 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:34 pm to OMLandshark
Screw this. The public deserves to know.
Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:49 pm to TerryDawg03
Who in the actual frick are these “entities “ that are “craving “ the sensational and IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?
Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:00 pm to OMLandshark

Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:14 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?
WAP at the Grammys but this is too much
Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:48 pm to DavidTheGnome
I have learned when the FBI and CIA tells a judge to rule in a certain way it does not matter the facts of the case or what the law says or what the Constitution says.
Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:49 pm to DavidTheGnome
The public has seen much worse on basic Tv, I guarantee. This is a cover-up, at some level
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:06 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’”
There are standards of what can be put out for public consumption, okay!!





Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:07 pm to OMLandshark
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/20/21 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:10 pm to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Does she think putting aluminum foil around her coochie will keep it from going bad?


Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:11 pm to BiteMe2020
quote:
Does she think putting aluminum foil around her coochie will keep it from going bad?
Ever hear of a tinfoil hat? Maybe she knows something the rest of us don't?
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:19 pm to OMLandshark
If the American public can handle the details if the Dahmer case, they can handle this.
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:24 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:Ummmmm.....two "ladies" just performed a song, in Prime Time TV, nation wide, LIVE, last Sunday night entitled "WAP" (wet arse pussy).
Who in the actual frick are these “entities “ that are “craving “ the sensational and IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:28 pm to HonoraryCoonass
The only thing that makes sense other than a cover up for politicians and celebrities is that the material involves minors and the judge and prosecutors don’t want to feed the sick appetites of perverts.
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:52 pm to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
I'm far from a prude; that being said, the macabre doesn't titillate this corner of the room. It merely revulses. Just one more reason to put these pieces of vile human trash in a submarine that never surfaces.
This post was edited on 3/20/21 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:58 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?
It means the details could hurt or incriminate important people.
Move along, peasant...
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:59 pm to OMLandshark
Jeffrey Dahmer used to eat gay dudes brains...but the public still knew about it.
Posted on 3/20/21 at 3:04 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
Who in the actual frick are these “entities “ that are “craving “ the sensational and IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?
It means the same thing it did in 1776, there's just more of it in the public view now.
Posted on 3/20/21 at 3:06 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too “sensational and impure” to reveal to the public.
Dude, l lived through the Curley Hallman & Trent Johnson years @ LSU. I think I’ll be alright.
Popular
Back to top
