- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gen. Jack Keane on the proposed deal
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:05 pm
Since the beginning of all this, Jack Kane has been fully on board with the conflict and has expressed his utmost support for Trump, even after the first 50 times a deal was announced and never came through.
To hear him be this concerned is even more concerning for me.
To hear him be this concerned is even more concerning for me.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:06 pm to The_Duke
Sounds like he has a vested interest in this conflict continuing.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:07 pm to The_Duke
We’re cooked now that Jack said so!!
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:08 pm to The_Duke
Step aside grandpa and let world move along.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:08 pm to The_Duke
You probably talked shite about Keane wanting Trump to keep his foot down on Iran with attacks.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:08 pm to The_Duke
He needs to stop being a panician.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:09 pm to JellyRoll
quote:
You probably talked shite about Keane wanting Trump to keep his foot down on Iran with attacks.
Won't find any of that from me.
I was more of "if you're going to talk big shite, then do big shite"
Trump threatened and pulled back at the last minute. That was my problem.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:10 pm to The_Duke
If the military option is not off of the table, then why worry Iran will not comply with the deal?
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:10 pm to The_Duke
Careful, you are going to anger the knee pad wearing, true believer crew....
This post was edited on 6/16/26 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:10 pm to The_Duke
And just like that, Keane has been moved to the other side of the ledger.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:11 pm to roadGator
quote:
And just like that, Keane has been moved to the other side of the ledger.
I always knew he was a blue haired tranny loving lib.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:12 pm to The_Duke
I'm more interested in what Jim Webb has to say. Aside from a record of killing people in war, he's probably one of the more clear thinkers we've ever had in politics in the last 45 years.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:16 pm to The_Duke
All of the advocates of crushing Iran and doing regime change need to convince the American people that it will be worth the cost.
Trump started in that direction, stopped, correctly read the room and reversed.
Trump started in that direction, stopped, correctly read the room and reversed.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:17 pm to KiwiHead
Summary of a recent podcast with Webb.
AI generated
ETA: I see you are back in good form. Much faster.
quote:
Foreign policy consultant and Iraq War veteran James R. Webb strongly opposes the U.S. war with Iran, arguing the conflict is a strategic failure that has severely damaged America's global standing and primarily serves Israeli regional interests.
AI generated
ETA: I see you are back in good form. Much faster.
This post was edited on 6/16/26 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:25 pm to Timeoday
quote:
If the military option is not off of the table, then why worry Iran will not comply with the deal?
My POV was not to get involved in a religious war in the first place.
Now Iran knows that whenever they need a few 100B, they can start some shite, and everyone will eventually pay them to stop it.
They'll go quiet for a few years, maybe, and once they blow through that, they'll kick some shite back up.
It's a no-win situation, but I do give some props to Obama and Trump for thinking they can "fix" it---
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:29 pm to kingbob
quote:
Sounds like he has a vested interest in this conflict continuing.
Are you talking about Trump or Keane?
I think the key thing President Trump says is "They can't have a nuclear weapon because if they have one they probably would use it".
If Trump truly believes this why is he making a deal that leaves the Islamic terrorists in charge?
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:30 pm to The_Duke
quote:
Since the beginning of all this, Jack Kane has been fully on board with the conflict and has expressed his utmost support for Trump, even after the first 50 times a deal was announced and never came through.
It takes BOTH SIDES to uphold an agreement.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:33 pm to The_Duke
quote:
I was more of "if you're going to talk big shite, then do big shite"
Trump threatened and pulled back at the last minute. That was my problem.
So you were a Trump supporter when the bombing first started?
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:37 pm to DeBoar
If Keane is whining, then it was the right thing.
Popular
Back to top

24











