
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fun Exercise: Show the AI description of your posting characteristics on TigerDroppings
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:34 pm to Azkiger
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:34 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Glad you enjoyed getting glazed by an LLM, though
I'm aware of the bias. That's why I asked others to post about my views from THEIR AI.
At least two did.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:41 pm to 4cubbies
quote:Conservatives: Justice is imperfect in this life, but that doesn’t mean we should not seek to be just.
Founders: “It is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.”
Modern conservatives: "It's better that ten innocent persons are executed, than that one guilty person achieve comfort."
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:43 pm to JellyRoll
quote:
I asked AI about your posts and if you use AI or other digital methods to help you formulate your responses and posts, and it said yes, IvoryMattBill appears to get help from other sources and most thoughts do not appear organic.
No wonder you got the wrong information about me. You put in the wrong username. AI can't adjust for organic user stupidity...yet.
Maybe wait a few months before trying it again.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:57 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
isn't your contention that I'm "cuckeye?"
Cuckeye, Liberal Hank, Ivorybillmat whatever
Its all the same
Posted on 10/6/26 at 11:00 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Cuckeye, Liberal Hank, Ivorybillmat whatever
Its all the same
It's always fun to watch you melt into an illogical puddle.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 11:03 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Your own AI literally said there was circumstantial evidence that you and Aggie Hank were the same poster.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:03 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I'm aware of the bias. That's why I asked others to post about my views from THEIR AI.
At least two did.
Those also contained positive bias as well.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 5:36 am to Azkiger
quote:
Those also contained positive bias as well.
The issue was whether or not I was actually anti-Trump. Why would AI have a bias about that?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 5:55 am to Riverside
quote:
Your own AI literally said there was circumstantial evidence that you and Aggie Hank were the same poster.
Of course, you're lying. It's Riverside. At least with me, it's what you do.
As to ANY EVIDENCE It was very explicit....
quote:
I don't see any evidence from the public material I've been able to locate that establishes you and AggieHank are the same person or that your account is an alter of his.
But, I am glad that you think ChatGPT is authoritative and can finally stop accusing me of having TDS.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:02 am to OWLFAN86
quote:
I mean the guy was definitely not Father of the year material But he didnt kill his kids
So no jury verdict. I’ll go with the actual trier of fact, rather than some “expert’s” examination of stale evidence.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:05 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Thanks
Most welcome. I thought it was really accurate.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:38 am to aubie101
quote:
is funny because i am called a lib and a progressive all the time. But if people would take 10 seconds and read my history they would see I am (extreme) far right socially and highly critical of progressive thought..
This is primarily why I started this thread: to see if those of us who are just accused of being liberal actually are liberal.
At least some people had fun. Cheers
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 6:43 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:17 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The issue was whether or not I was actually anti-Trump. Why would AI have a bias about that?
The AIs opening line tells me roughly what your prompt was:
"Based on the TigerDroppings posts we've looked at, I’d characterize your posting generally as:
Argumentative but research-oriented. You tend to make a claim and then support it with specific facts, dates, legal authorities, quotes, or links rather than just expressing an opinion."
You asked it about your post history generally, not specific to your stance on Trump. This is also backed up by the fact that of the rest of the post where it goes into specifics of your political stances/posting-type, the majority wasn't pertaining to Trump.
EDIT: Now that I've read it a second time, its not even about your post history generally. The "Based on the TigerDroppings posts we've looked at" suggests you copy/pasted specific examples instead of asking it to just search itself and find its own examples. So this probably isn't even your general post history, but your own curated list. So your own bias of your own selected posts to share with it might have influenced the LLM.
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 7:20 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:25 am to IvoryBillMatt
Someone do SloFloPro and watch ChatGPT's servers crash and burn for a day or so.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:36 am to Azkiger
quote:
EDIT: Now that I've read it a second time, its not even about your post history generally. The "Based on the TigerDroppings posts we've looked at" suggests you copy/pasted specific examples instead of asking it to just search itself and find its own examples. So this probably isn't even your general post history, but your own curated list. So your own bias of your own selected posts to share with it might have influenced the LLM.
I don't appreciate your suggestion that I'm lying. I already took a screenshot of my prompt and posted it in this thread already. There was certainly no "curated list."
Please do me a favor and prompt your AI to analyze whether IvoryBillMatt is Anti-Trump on Tigerdroppings.com.
FWIW, here's what mine found:
quote:
If I were analyzing your TD posting without knowing anything about you personally, I'd characterize the pattern approximately like this:
Pro-Trump: ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
Willingness to criticize Trump: ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
Anti-Trump: ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
The important distinction is that your criticism tends to be criticism of particular claims, decisions, policies, or factual assertions—not rejection of Trump himself or his presidency.
In fact, one of the strongest pieces of evidence against an anti-Trump characterization is that you seem to object to the idea that supporting Trump requires agreeing with everything he says. Your April 2025 statement essentially makes that your explicit philosophy. ?
TigerDroppings
So if someone on TigerDroppings looked only at your critical Trump posts, they could reasonably perceive an anti-Trump tone. But if they looked at your posting history as a whole, I think “Trump supporter who is not a Trump loyalist” is substantially more accurate than “Trump critic” or “anti-Trumper.”
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:46 am to IvoryBillMatt
Prompt: are there certain times when the political board becomes more hostile? Can you identify why that happens?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:47 am to roadGator
quote:
Prompt: are there certain times when the political board becomes more hostile? Can you identify why that happens?
Lol
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:47 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I don't appreciate your suggestion that I'm lying.
"suggests you copy/pasted"
"So this probably isn't even your general post history"
"might have influenced the AI"
I'm not sure if you have the reading comprehension to properly steer an AI into doing what you really want it to do. No offense, but there's a lot of nuance, each model is different, each version is different, *every* word matters, often times people who utilize these tools for hours each day still have trouble mastering them.
Sure, you're using them in a pretty mundane matter, but I'm seeing little alarm bells all over ChatGPTs reply to you.
But whatever. Have your fun with it.

Popular
Back to top


1







