Started By
Message

re: Friendly reminder to all Trumpsters...

Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:35 am to
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
14274 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Are you saying that you were not involved in the conversations about Mitch pulling funding and that Trump should have used his on money?


I don't even know what you're talking about. I'm not a big fan of McConnell
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
14274 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:35 am to
quote:

all of whom led in honest polling just before or leading up to their elections

must have won with all that 3AM the day after the election voting

Dont be a retard




Mastriano was never close in any poll
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Mastriano was never close in any poll

dont know about that but the other 7-15?

Dont be a retard, the under polled demographic was definitely the 3AM the day after the election vote brought in when poll watchers COULDNT
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
107395 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:43 am to
quote:

In the past election cycle, every one of his hand-picked "stop the steal" candidates went down in flames. Every single one. I will repeat, as many of you seem to be a bit slow: EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

Lauren Boebert? Almost lost


So, not every single one.

I will repeat, as you seem to be a bit slow: NOT. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.
Posted by SpotCheckBilly
Member since May 2020
8316 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:48 am to
Herschel was a terrible candidate and ran a bad campaign and yet pushed Warnock to a run-off. The GOP needs to do a better job of picking candidates.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Herschel was a terrible candidate and ran a bad campaign and yet pushed Warnock to a run-off. The GOP needs to do a better job of picking candidates.

Why no scrutiny of Warnock as a candidate for trying to kill his wife - or is bad candidacy only a conservative trait?
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5355 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Every single competitive race with an "America First Stop the Steal" candidate had that candidate going down in flames.

So, if you were the person in charge of stealing elections, who would you target?


Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
21963 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Why no scrutiny of Warnock as a candidate for trying to kill his wife - or is bad candidacy only a conservative trait?

Dude, they elected a pedophile president. Do you think they're going to give a shite about a senator trying to kill his wife?

Warnock has won two elections for Dems. He's a great candidate for Democrats.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18962 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:12 am to
quote:

TIGERHOLD


Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
6048 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:19 am to
If you assume elections aren’t actually fair and transparent, you then arrive at the conclusion that those stop the steal candidates are the very particular ones that needed to lose.
Posted by Cajun Tigah
Tennessee Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
4071 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:36 am to
quote:

So as an actual conservative, I choose to donate to Trump's super PAC rather than the RNC's or Mitch's, because I don't trust those frickers. And then Trump turns around and does the same thing they did


You donated to a presidential candidate. He’s going to do what a candidate does, use it for his candidacy. He doesn’t know what you want to do with a donation to his candidacy. If you wanted money to go to a particular candidate, you should have donated it to them. Your TDS is making some of your arguments verging on unhinged.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 11:37 am to
quote:

How many of these were in competitive districts


virtually all of them other than a few
Posted by 3Son
1st Son in present times
Member since Jan 2017
2438 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:21 pm to
2 words: (D)ominion voting machines
Posted by SpotCheckBilly
Member since May 2020
8316 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Why no scrutiny of Warnock as a candidate for trying to kill his wife - or is bad candidacy only a conservative trait?


Some of Warnock's marriage issues were brought up, but the media paid little attention to it. The Dems ran a much slicker, albeit deceitful, campaign and the Reps were slow to counter and when they did, did so poorly.

For example, the Dems repeatedly ran an effective ad that showed Herschel's wife talk about how bad things got between them. What they didn't show was that Herschel was sitting next to her and the context of the exchange was that this was how bad things were before he sought help and confronted his demons.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
17375 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:33 pm to
Any system that allowed the presidential election to be stolen can steal all elections
Posted by BengalOnTheBay
Member since Aug 2022
3855 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Kari Lake? Lost.
Blake Masters? Lost.
Dr. Oz? Lost to slingblade Fetterman.
Doug Mastriano? Lost.


I'll be interested to hear your hypothetical McCain-lite Republican that would have won these races.


quote:

Herschel Walker? Lost.


Oh yeah, terrible candidate... ran over his wife, beat her, used campaign funds to ship his kids away so he didn't have to be around them, funneled money from nonprofits to himself... oh wait, that was Warnock.

quote:

John Gibbs? Lost.


Gibbs is a total boss, and I would rather him lose than Meijer win.

quote:

Joe Kent? Lost.


A democrat in the seat is better than Beutler.

quote:

Tudor Dixon? Lost.


The feds literally made up an entire domestic terrorism plot to ensure Whitmer would be reflected. You think they were going to let her lose after that?

quote:

Bo Hines? Lost.


Election was a total CF through no fault of his own.


quote:

Tim Michels? Lost.


He was endorsed by everyone, so not sure what your point is regarding Trump.

quote:

Lauren Boebert? Almost lost, despite her district being R+15.


It's not anymore so I have no idea why people continue to spout this as if it is a fact.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
54014 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

In the past election cycle, every one of his hand-picked "stop the steal" candidates went down in flames. Every single one. I will repeat, as many of you seem to be a bit slow: EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.
Kari Lake? Lost.
Blake Masters? Lost.
Dr. Oz? Lost to slingblade Fetterman.
Doug Mastriano? Lost.
Herschel Walker? Lost.
John Gibbs? Lost.
Joe Kent? Lost.
Tudor Dixon? Lost.
Bo Hines? Lost.
Tim Michels? Lost.
Lauren Boebert? Almost lost, despite her district being R+15. So, please explain to me how this is part of "57d intergalactic chess" and how I just need to "trust the plan". Is losing every election part of this plan?


What your OP illustrates is a large portion of society is still battling long haul TDS. There's not one candidate you listed who lost that wouldn't be better for America .....it's not debatable....look where the nation is today.
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
22975 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 12:59 pm to
Are you suggesting that we support a mainstream loser like many of us did when we voted for Mittens in 2012? Or McCain in 2008?
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3289 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

More reminders for the all the Trumpsters.



Ok Message Board Luser, I give. What exactly are all of the Corona/Fauci references supposed to remind us of. The list of reminders that awaits you is rather extensive & still growing, by the way.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
21963 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 10:35 am to
quote:

You donated to a presidential candidate. He’s going to do what a candidate does, use it for his candidacy. He doesn’t know what you want to do with a donation to his candidacy. If you wanted money to go to a particular candidate, you should have donated it to them.

There are different types of PACs. Some are distinct in who can donate (like unions, etc), and others are distinct in what they're intended for/how they can spend money.

Trump's Save America PAC is a "Leadership PAC". Here is how Open Secrets explains what a Leadership PAC is:

Politicians collect money for their own campaigns — we all know that. But many of them also raise a separate pot of money, commonly called a leadership political action committee, to help other politicians. By making donations to members of their party, ambitious lawmakers can use their leadership PACs to gain clout among their colleagues and boost their bids for leadership posts or committee chairmanships.

So basically, you don't know what they frick you're talking about.

quote:

Your TDS is making some of your arguments verging on unhinged.

It's hilarious how many "they voted against mean tweets!" Trump sycophants cannot handle even the slightest criticism of DT. You are as soft as they are. Just on the other end of the spectrum. I have as much "TDS" as you do "retard".
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram